Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 277
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

In all seriousness, dont. Its something he has spent a long time on worked out and i wont just give it away. As i said he's on holidays, another week to go. But i doubt he'll give it as it's his proprietry. Just like some shops with their engine "secrets". :P

Colonal sanders hey, haha.

spacers between exhaust manifolds and turbos that drop the turbos downwards? seen this done before to good effect - keeps stock plumbing, dumps etc.

Mark,

That is something i was instigating but then u have the challenge of fitting the turbo oil lines and intake pipes...it all becomes a bit of a mess. On top of this, it doesnt give anymore clearance to the bonnet as the engine height remains 1inch higher with the rb30 donk

spacers between exhaust manifolds and turbos that drop the turbos downwards? seen this done before to good effect - keeps stock plumbing, dumps etc.

Pretty good thinking however it doesnt explain the cam timing cover

Mark,

That is something i was instigating but then u have the challenge of fitting the turbo oil lines and intake pipes...it all becomes a bit of a mess. On top of this, it doesnt give anymore clearance to the bonnet as the engine height remains 1inch higher with the rb30 donk

Hi Marko

doh, of course. friend of mine did this ages ago on an R33, dropped them by 38mm but I recall he used the stock lines etc would have to be close I'd have thought. still rubbed on the bonnet slightly come to think of it.

haven't looked under mine to confirm its possible but what about reprofiling the cross member and then slotting the mounts?

Hi Marko

doh, of course. friend of mine did this ages ago on an R33, dropped them by 38mm but I recall he used the stock lines etc would have to be close I'd have thought. still rubbed on the bonnet slightly come to think of it.

haven't looked under mine to confirm its possible but what about reprofiling the cross member and then slotting the mounts?

Does anyone actually know 'how much' it has to be lowered to clear everything? Is 3mm enough? Or 10mm? Makes a big difference in what is achieveable.

ie if its only 3mm, I could see slotting the engine mounts would almost do it.. if its 10mm though......

Edited by R32 TT
Does anyone actually know 'how much' it has to be lowered to clear everything? Is 3mm enough? Or 10mm? Makes a big difference in what is achieveable.

ie if its only 3mm, I could see slotting the engine mounts would almost do it.. if its 10mm though......

i heard it is only about 15mm to clear the bonnet...i was going to slot my engine mounts BUT people in the know how such as rob @ rips strongly advised not to do this as the goemetry of the suspension is affected. modifying the cross member wuold do the exact same thing

i heard it is only about 15mm to clear the bonnet...i was going to slot my engine mounts BUT people in the know how such as rob @ rips strongly advised not to do this as the goemetry of the suspension is affected. modifying the cross member wuold do the exact same thing

The engine mounts have NOTHING to do with suspension geometry... They do not touch it ONE BIT... I can't see how slotting the mounts will affect it.

Adjusting the cross member, from memory some of the arms are mounted off of it, so that would be a problem.

The engine mounts have NOTHING to do with suspension geometry... They do not touch it ONE BIT... I can't see how slotting the mounts will affect it.

Adjusting the cross member, from memory some of the arms are mounted off of it, so that would be a problem.

sorry. let me elaborate...dropping the engine will mean that the front cv's will also drop down with the engine which will have an adverse effect on the entire front end in terms of clearance & position of front driveshafts

dropping the engine will also give less clearance to the road

sorry. let me elaborate...dropping the engine will mean that the front cv's will also drop down with the engine which will have an adverse effect on the entire front end in terms of clearance & position of front driveshafts

dropping the engine will also give less clearance to the road

Well to be fair, no matter what you do - you are going to be dropping the motor relative to the wheels.. The head has to come down under the bonnet - therefore so does the block and so does the sump and cv's (unless you can squash the block by 15mm :D ) So whether you do it at the engine mounts or other ways - its still going to impact on the CV's position yeah?

I don't think this is a huge issue if the car is kept at 'reasonable ride height'. Normally when guys lower the car via short springs the CV's have to deal with a bigger change then.. not to mention the changes going on all the time when the car is actually driving around corners under full load on semi's...

i heard it is only about 15mm to clear the bonnet...i was going to slot my engine mounts BUT people in the know how such as rob @ rips strongly advised not to do this as the goemetry of the suspension is affected. modifying the cross member wuold do the exact same thing

i reckon 15mm is about right...there's bugger all in it and without cutting I could actually shut my bonnet - it just wasn't a good shut in that I knew there was minor contact.

curiouser and curiouser...

I dont own a GTR and havent really worked on one....but cant you just space the crossmember down? As in a packer to go inbetween the chassis rails and where the crossmember bolts up.

Say 10mm worth there and then slot the engine mounts down say 5mm and bam there is your 15mm. Hopefully with clearance still between crossmember and sump/diff housing/driveshaft/cv. :) So long as you maintain the 10 degree lean that rb's have, it should be fine.

I dont own a GTR and havent really worked on one....but cant you just space the crossmember down? As in a packer to go inbetween the chassis rails and where the crossmember bolts up.

Say 10mm worth there and then slot the engine mounts down say 5mm and bam there is your 15mm. Hopefully with clearance still between crossmember and sump/diff housing/driveshaft/cv. :) So long as you maintain the 10 degree lean that rb's have, it should be fine.

Did you even bother to read the thread before posting?

Lol actually those last few pages, no i didnt read them properly. Just a quick browse over then it was a while after that i posted that. My bad, I now notice that what i suggested had been covered and rejected.

But its been done before, spacing subframes down. Im sure i did that fricken 7 years ago when i put a rb20det in my sil80.

seeing as though the rear of the motor sits at pretty much the same height as an rb26 and the front is a little higher im going to go with gearbox crossmember/mount being lowered as well as engine mounts.

seeing as though the rear of the motor sits at pretty much the same height as an rb26 and the front is a little higher im going to go with gearbox crossmember/mount being lowered as well as engine mounts.

I suggested that the gearbox had been mounted differently but I was getting at raising the gearbox mounts to tilt the engine forward to clear.. no response :stupid:

i also think u have cracked the answer.

i would not be messing around with the driveline geometry, if it was a gemini or dato 1600 then why not...a well engineered gtr though?

but haven't you done just that when you put a spacer plate on the bottom of your engine? It would lower the front driveshafts connection point by the thickness of the plate so therefore alter the angle...yes?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey y'all! I'm curious about how y'all go about widebodying your cars. I noticed that when running a square setup, my front wheels are a bit more tucked in than my rear wheels. Not by much, maybe 5-10mm. This leads me to wonder - when I widebody, should I use narrower front flares and wider rear flares? I found a set of 40mm rear flares that I really like, and was thinking of pairing them with some 18mm front flares, but I don't want the car to look strange. How have others done this? Note, I'm in a sedan. Thanks!
    • And if it was anything other than an auto tranny part, it might be a problem. But seeing as all auto trannies belong in the recycling bin, it's fine.
    • I have an R32 Fenix rad. It is good.
    • All the schemas I can see, indicate your typical setup of ATF 'cooler' (read: heat exchanger) in the bottom radiator tank..ie; https://nissan.epc-data.com/stagea/wgnc34/5413-rb25det/engine/214/ ...but I can prattle on a bit here. These trannies have a thermistor in the sump ~ the TCU reads this and 1. bumps the line pressure up when the ATF is 'cold' and 2. prevents the TC lockup clutch from operating, until the ATF comes up to minimum operating temp (keeps the ATF 'churning' through the TC so it heats up quicker) -- trigger point is around 55C. In these conditions, the engine coolant temperature rises faster than the ATF temperature, and also helps heat the ATF up, which is why it's best to think of the in radiator tank setup as a heat exchanger ; the heat can flow in both directions... ...with these trannies, the 'hot' ATF comes out the front banjo bolt, flows through the cooler/heat exchanger, and returns to the box  via the rear banjo bolt. This gets a mention, due to the wildly different opinions wrt running auto trans fluid coolers ~ do you bypass the in radiator tank altogether, or put the cooler inline with the in radiator tank system...and then, do you put the additional cooler before of after the in radiator tank system?... ....fact is the nominal engine operating temp (roughly 75C), happens to be the ideal temperature for the ATF used in these trannies as well (no surprises there), so for the in radiator tank system to actually 'cool' the ATF, the ATF temp has to be hotter than that...lets say 100C -- you've got 25C of 'excess' heat, (slowly) pumping into the 75C coolant. This part of the equation changes drastically, when you've got 100C ATF flowing through an air cooled radiator ; you can move a lot more excess heat, faster ~ it is possible to cool the ATF 'too much' as it were...(climate matters a lot)... ...in an 'ideal' setup, what you're really trying to control here, is flash heating of the ATF, primarily produced by the TC interface. In a perfect world, wrt auto trans oil cooling, you want a dedicated trans cooler with builtin thermostatic valving - they exist. These should be run inline and before the in radiator tank system ~ when 'cold' the valving bypasses the fin stack, allowing the ATF to flow direct to the in radiator tank heat exchanger, so it works 'as intended' with helping heat the ATF up. When 'hot' (iirc it was 50C threshold), the valving shuts forcing the ATF through the cooler fin stack, and onto the in radiator tank heat exchanger...and you sort of think of it as a 'thermal conditioner' of sorts...ie; if you did cool your ATF down to 65C, the coolant will add a little heat, otherwise it works as intended... ...the 'hot' ATF coming from the front bango bolt, is instantiated from the TC when in use, so all/any flash heated oil, flows to the fluid-to-air cooler first, and because of the greater heat differential, you can get rid of this heat fast. Just how big (BTU/h) this cooler needs to be to effectively dissipate this TC flash heat, is the charm...too many variables to discuss here, but I just wanted to point out the nitty-gritty of automatic trans fluid coolers ~ they're a different beastie to what most ppl think of when considering an 'oil cooler'... /3.5cents   
    • Been a busy but productive day. Axle and hubs acquired. All fitted up after a bit of modifying. Need to sort out wider mudguards and running light reflector covers but other than that the trailer is gooood to go !!
×
×
  • Create New...