Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well guys what a top day. This is was the first CRD run Dyno Day that I have attended and I was most impressed with how smoothly the event was run.

Thanks must go to Jim and Theo from CRD for kindly offering their facilities for us to use.

Now to the results - look below:

Carlo - R33 GTS-T - 160.2 KW (Up from 139 KW on first run)

Dave - MY99 WRX - 123.7 KW at all four

Benm - R33 GTS-T - 180 KW

Dom - R32 GTS-T - 147.8 KW

JimBo2000 - R33 GTS-T - 198.6 KW

EAV-00L - R33 GTS-T - 170.8 KW

RAIDER - S15 200SX - 177.1 KW

WrxKilla - EVO 4 - 146.4 KW (Not running correctly)

WrxKilla's Mate - Pulsar Gti-R RWD - 164.9 KW

RedGTST - R33 GTS-T - 162.1 KW

Judd - Integra Type R Turbo - 103 KW

David - R32 GTS-T - 167.4 KW

Unknown - WRX Sti - 132.KW

Jarrad - R34 GTT - 163.9 KW

Matt - S14 200SX - 142.5 KW

Joseph - R33 GTS-T - 150.6 KW

CURMAC? - HSV - 200.3 KW

Unknown - Ford XR8 - 206.1 KW

Steve - S15 200SX - 167.3 KW

Unknown - R34 GTT - 140.3 KW

IYI - R33 GTS-T - 253.1 KW

SNG - R32 GTR - 236.6 KW At all four

Top Performers:

Buster - R33 GTS-T (Stock) :( - 324.5 KW

CNG - R33 GTR - 303.7 KW At all four

Merli - R33 GTR - (TBA)

Thankyou to all of you who attended!

Nick

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/26813-crd-dyno-day-review-thread/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 99
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Adjusted Results in car model order:

R32 GTS-T - David - 167.4 KW

R32 GTS-T - Dom - 147.8 KW

-

R32 GTR - SNG - 236.6 KW

-

R33 GTS-T - Buster - 324.5 KW

R33 GTS-T - IYI - 253.1 KW

R33 GTS-T - JimBo2000 - 198.6 KW

R33 GTS-T - Benm - 180 KW

R33 GTS-T - EAV-00L - 170.8 KW

R33 GTS-T - RedGTST - 162.1 KW

R33 GTS-T - Carlo - 160.2 KW

R33 GTS-T - Joseph - 150.6 KW

-

R33 GTR - CNG - 303.7 KW

-

R34 GTT - Jarrad - 163.9 KW

R34 GTT - Unknown - 140.3 KW

-

WRX Sti - Unknown - 132.KW

MY99 WRX - Dave - 123.7 KW

-

S15 200SX - RAIDER - 177.1 KW

S15 200SX - Steve - 167.3 KW

S14 200SX - Matt - 142.5 KW

-

EVO 4 - WrxKilla - 146.4 KW

-

Pulsar Gti-R RWD - WrxKilla's Mate - 164.9 KW

-

Integra Type R Turbo - Judd - 103 KW

-

HSV - CURMAC? - 200.3 KW

-

Ford XR8 - Unknown - 206.1 KW

Originally posted by B-Man

Hey Carlo ! Nice one - tell me how you got extra 21rwkw

Carlo was low on fuel, thought he was putting some ELF into the tank but it was actually the Pepsi cans we were selling for $1ea, top shiat !

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Block bump. $400. As above cyl 6 needs bore or sleeve.
    • I would think making the argument that the travel is limited by a spring flexing against a spring perch as "the same method". Later on in the document they do state that the spring can't bind on full bump travel and cannot come loose in full rebound travel as well. (which is all very sensible). The laws are actually pretty sensible and reasonable. It's just that the people who enforce and check them don't actually read them or know them accurately. "Oh, coilovers? Instant fail mate. Don't even need to look at it." - Guy who will be instantly reported by me. There is probably merit to people who do get defected for height also get defected for the suspension in that state that allows it. I did never consider the people who are complaining about coilovers being picked on are also running around at 50mm off the floor.
    • I think given SAU's knowledge of E85 we can strongly conclude that 10% ethanol in almost any situation is entirely fine. Almost all of the myths against E85 were overblown, let alone E10.
    • From your link See bold text, is this referring to damper settings, if so that may a issue for "some" inspectors, I cannot see aftermarket coilovers having the evidence that "must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original" Maybe just remove the adjustment knows and hope for the best???? Meh 5.2 Suspension travel In all instances, modifications to a vehicle’s suspension must ensure the integrity of the system and not compromise the ride quality. At least two thirds of the original suspension travel should be maintained in both directions (rebound (i.e. extension) and bump (i.e. compression)), and rebound must be limited by the same method used by the vehicle manufacturer or if this is not practicable due to the nature of the modification, an equivalent method. If an alternative method is used, evidence must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original.
    • They actually don't - They adhere to VSB14 rules just like Victoria. The rules are against CABIN adjustable height, and it quite clearly states that the height has to be within parameters. I asked the VASS engineer to confirm this when I got my car engineered and they refused to engineer the coilovers because they didn't meet the requirements for requiring engineering. (mine are height adjustable.) People "Not wanting to bother" with "Actually reading/knowing/adhering to the rules" should result in fines and immediately losing the ability to issue blue slips and/or RWC's in Vic.
×
×
  • Create New...