Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well guys what a top day. This is was the first CRD run Dyno Day that I have attended and I was most impressed with how smoothly the event was run.

Thanks must go to Jim and Theo from CRD for kindly offering their facilities for us to use.

Now to the results - look below:

Carlo - R33 GTS-T - 160.2 KW (Up from 139 KW on first run)

Dave - MY99 WRX - 123.7 KW at all four

Benm - R33 GTS-T - 180 KW

Dom - R32 GTS-T - 147.8 KW

JimBo2000 - R33 GTS-T - 198.6 KW

EAV-00L - R33 GTS-T - 170.8 KW

RAIDER - S15 200SX - 177.1 KW

WrxKilla - EVO 4 - 146.4 KW (Not running correctly)

WrxKilla's Mate - Pulsar Gti-R RWD - 164.9 KW

RedGTST - R33 GTS-T - 162.1 KW

Judd - Integra Type R Turbo - 103 KW

David - R32 GTS-T - 167.4 KW

Unknown - WRX Sti - 132.KW

Jarrad - R34 GTT - 163.9 KW

Matt - S14 200SX - 142.5 KW

Joseph - R33 GTS-T - 150.6 KW

CURMAC? - HSV - 200.3 KW

Unknown - Ford XR8 - 206.1 KW

Steve - S15 200SX - 167.3 KW

Unknown - R34 GTT - 140.3 KW

IYI - R33 GTS-T - 253.1 KW

SNG - R32 GTR - 236.6 KW At all four

Top Performers:

Buster - R33 GTS-T (Stock) :( - 324.5 KW

CNG - R33 GTR - 303.7 KW At all four

Merli - R33 GTR - (TBA)

Thankyou to all of you who attended!

Nick

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/26813-crd-dyno-day-review-thread/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 99
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Adjusted Results in car model order:

R32 GTS-T - David - 167.4 KW

R32 GTS-T - Dom - 147.8 KW

-

R32 GTR - SNG - 236.6 KW

-

R33 GTS-T - Buster - 324.5 KW

R33 GTS-T - IYI - 253.1 KW

R33 GTS-T - JimBo2000 - 198.6 KW

R33 GTS-T - Benm - 180 KW

R33 GTS-T - EAV-00L - 170.8 KW

R33 GTS-T - RedGTST - 162.1 KW

R33 GTS-T - Carlo - 160.2 KW

R33 GTS-T - Joseph - 150.6 KW

-

R33 GTR - CNG - 303.7 KW

-

R34 GTT - Jarrad - 163.9 KW

R34 GTT - Unknown - 140.3 KW

-

WRX Sti - Unknown - 132.KW

MY99 WRX - Dave - 123.7 KW

-

S15 200SX - RAIDER - 177.1 KW

S15 200SX - Steve - 167.3 KW

S14 200SX - Matt - 142.5 KW

-

EVO 4 - WrxKilla - 146.4 KW

-

Pulsar Gti-R RWD - WrxKilla's Mate - 164.9 KW

-

Integra Type R Turbo - Judd - 103 KW

-

HSV - CURMAC? - 200.3 KW

-

Ford XR8 - Unknown - 206.1 KW

Originally posted by B-Man

Hey Carlo ! Nice one - tell me how you got extra 21rwkw

Carlo was low on fuel, thought he was putting some ELF into the tank but it was actually the Pepsi cans we were selling for $1ea, top shiat !

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
    • Hmmm, interesting. Makes me wonder whether there is bias as well. It's the cheapest fuel, so it is used for all kinds of ill-maintained shitboxes which are bound to have issues regardless. Nicer cars tend to require higher octane rated fuel and can't use it anyway. FWIW, the official NSW E10 facts page is decent. 
×
×
  • Create New...