Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hello all,

so ive put this problem up before but nobody could figure it out, no mechanics here in NZ can figure it out either.

IN A GALAXY FAR FAR AWAY...........

I bought an STI WRX from auckland (auckland being at sea level) with the usual extras, the most notable one being the aftermarket Link computer, and brought it down to queenstown where i live (about 400m above sea level).

When it started getting warmer after winter (air getting warmer/thinner) the car started running rich, popping, backfiring, fouling plugs. sold it about 1 1/2 years later cause no one could fix it

I bought a GTR from auckland, usual extras, power fc etc. same problem, starts running richer when i get it to queenstown, got a Link put in it when i got it more heavily modifed and it fouls plugs real quick.

first thing in the morning the car is un-driveable, i took it to my mechanic yesterday (in christchurch sea level) where he said it started and ran perfectly, he is going to retune it and lean it off, as the first was tune was rich (safe)

i know that the sensors should adjust to the atmospheric conditions, but whats the problem?

ive spent so much coin on this car, and dont want to sell it

any advice/help would be great

cheers robbie

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/268608-gtr-million-dollar-question/
Share on other sites

Got same prob but at a smaller scale.. I live in Sweden, cars running in Japan runs great, gets here and then goes rich and/or eats up sparkplugs, guess its due to other air conditions, density, temperature etc.

Could you please send the million in Swedish krones? 1 000 000,00 AUD gives 6 136 000,00 SEK.

Thank you. .. ..... :P:D:):w00t:

Edited by brother_david

a difference of only 400 meters above sea level can be considered totally insignificant so far as air pressure / density is concerned

you need to look elsewhere - dodgy fuel is one possibility among about several .............

lol

a difference of only 400 meters above sea level can be considered totally insignificant so far as air pressure / density is concerned

you need to look elsewhere - dodgy fuel is one possibility among about several .............

lol

hey i think you may be right, queenstown i think i have heard gets alot of shit fuel? hmmmmmmmm, but than why did it start in christchuch the next day sweet as?

Edited by donkeypunch

hello

we need more information to be able to work out what is wrong, but it sounds like, without no further information you have a map sensor based setup thats been tuned in different atmospheric conditions, so when you move the car to a large variance in atmospheric pressure, the tune is off-whack

this is certainly possible with mathematics to occur, but i am unsure how much pressure difference sea level is vs 400m above

at sea level pressure we are 1 bar or 735mmhg or 94.8kpa

at 400mb above pressure we are 711mmhg or 99.4kpa

so its enough to drive a change in the map sensor by 5% difference

depending on how its tuned, may make it run like a bucket off poo

so

with your current setup is it AFM or map sensor?

if its link, we are assuming Map sensor

when you had the powerfc, was it AFM or Djetro?

did you have any issues with the powerfc?

if you did have issues, what setup was it,? afm or djetro?

but i would hope in the real world, a 5% pressure change, wouldnt make the car run like a bucket of crap

that would seem unreasonable, so it could be a poor state of tune, or a very quick and nasty tune?

i woudl expect a typical map sensor / djetro system would compensate for a pressure change such as yours

much like an AFM would when temperature changes from summer to winter etc

hello

we need more information to be able to work out what is wrong, but it sounds like, without no further information you have a map sensor based setup thats been tuned in different atmospheric conditions, so when you move the car to a large variance in atmospheric pressure, the tune is off-whack

this is certainly possible with mathematics to occur, but i am unsure how much pressure difference sea level is vs 400m above

at sea level pressure we are 1 bar or 735mmhg or 94.8kpa

at 400mb above pressure we are 711mmhg or 99.4kpa

so its enough to drive a change in the map sensor by 5% difference

depending on how its tuned, may make it run like a bucket off poo

so

with your current setup is it AFM or map sensor?

if its link, we are assuming Map sensor

when you had the powerfc, was it AFM or Djetro?

did you have any issues with the powerfc?

if you did have issues, what setup was it,? afm or djetro?

hey paul33,

this is what im talking about, cheers for the reply, yes the power fc had AFM's, it is now running the new Link G4 with map sensors, and yes you are correct it was tuned in christchurch at sea level, and as i posted it started perfect this morning in christchurch, but where i live in queenstown (400m above sea level) it starts badly.

when i got the car back from christchurch about 6 months ago it ran real well for about 3 mths, then started running badly. just before i took it to the drag race meet i put new plugs in it, it ran perfect. i did the plugs in while engine was hot so it wouldnt run full choke and foul them, drove about 25k, did about 7 passes drove home, did about another 30k, plugs fouled

Edited by donkeypunch

should not do that at 400m, i have used cars here in dandenong that live / compete on mt buller and mt Isa (google that one :) ) and the differrence is enough to effect the tune but not enough to foul plugs. It should be factored for though.

Edited by URAS

Isn't the benefit of a F/I car that it can detect the pressure and temp difference and adjust as required the basemap?

We were cranking 6000ft, or 1800m density altitude (pressure altitude adjusted for temperature) in Toowoomba the other day, that's not crazy unusual for here and cars run fine at the top or bottom of the range.

Isn't the benefit of a F/I car that it can detect the pressure and temp difference and adjust as required the basemap?

We were cranking 6000ft, or 1800m density altitude (pressure altitude adjusted for temperature) in Toowoomba the other day, that's not crazy unusual for here and cars run fine at the top or bottom of the range.

hey thanks for that

but i would hope in the real world, a 5% pressure change, wouldnt make the car run like a bucket of crap

that would seem unreasonable, so it could be a poor state of tune, or a very quick and nasty tune?

shouldn't do that over a pissy 400m...

was the tune in summer on a hot day?

logically if you think about it, as trent said, the buller hillclimb is a vertical kilometre.... and my car runs that bottom to top no worries

from the little info we have I would say it's a poor tune. simple as that. the car should not run poorly over a change in altitude of 400m.

cool thanks for that, if i get the new dyno readout could you guys let me know if it is a bad tune or not?

cheers

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Next on the to-do list was an oil and filter change. Nothing exciting to add here except the oil filter is in a really stupid place (facing the engine mount/subframe/steering rack). GReddy do a relocation kit which puts it towards the gearbox, I would have preferred towards the front but there's obviously a lot more stuff there. Something I'll have to look at for the next service perhaps. First time using Valvoline oil, although I can't see it being any different to most other brands Nice... The oil filter location... At least the subframe wont rust any time soon I picked up a genuine fuel filter, this is part of the fuel pump assembly inside the fuel tank. Access can be found underneath the rear seat, you'll see this triangular cover Remove the 3x plastic 10mm nuts and lift the cover up, pushing the rubber grommet through The yellow fuel line clips push out in opposite directions, remove these completely. The two moulded fuel lines can now pull upwards to disconnect, along with the wire electrical plug. There's 8x 8mm bolts that secure the black retaining ring. The fuel pump assembly is now ready to lift out. Be mindful of the fuel hose on the side, the hose clamp on mine was catching the hose preventing it from lifting up The fuel pump/filter has an upper and lower section held on by 4 pressure clips. These did take a little bit of force, it sounded like the plastic tabs were going to break but they didn't (don't worry!) The lower section helps mount the fuel pump, there's a circular rubber gasket/grommet/seal thing on the bottom where the sock is. Undo the hose clip on the short fuel hose on the side to disconnect it from the 3 way distribution pipe to be able to lift the upper half away. Don't forget to unplug the fuel pump too! There's a few rubber O rings that will need transferring to the new filter housing, I show these in the video at the bottom of this write up. Reassembly is the reverse Here's a photo of the new filter installed, you'll be able to see where the tabs are more clearing against the yellow OEM plastic Once the assembly is re-installed, I turned the engine over a few times to help build up fuel pressure. I did panic when the car stopped turning over but I could hear the fuel pump making a noise. It eventually started and has been fine since. Found my 'lucky' coin underneath the rear seat too The Youtube video can be seen here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLJ65pmQt44&t=6s
    • It was picked up on the MOT/Inspection that the offside front wheel bearing had excessive play along with the ball joint. It made sense to do both sides so I sourced a pair of spare IS200 hubs to do the swap. Unfortunately I don't have any photos of the strip down but here's a quick run down. On the back of the hub is a large circular dust cover, using a flat head screw driver and a mallet I prised it off. Underneath will reveal a 32mm hub nut (impact gun recommended). With the hub nut removed the ABS ring can be removed (I ended up using a magnetic pick up tool to help). Next up is to remove the stub axle, this was a little trickier due to limited tools. I tried a 3 leg puller but the gap between the hub and stub axle wasn't enough for the legs to get in and under. Next option was a lump hammer and someone pulling the stub axle at the same time. After a few heavy hits it released. The lower bearing race had seized itself onto the stub axle, which was fine because I was replacing them anyway. With the upper bearing race removed and the grease cleaned off they looked like this The left one looked pristine inside but gave us the most trouble. The right one had some surface rust but came apart in a single hit, figure that out?! I got a local garage to press the new wheel bearings in, reassemble was the opposite and didn't take long at all. Removing the hub itself was simple. Starting with removing the brake caliper, 2x 14mm bolts for the caliper slider and 2x 19mm? for the carrier > hub bolts. I used a cable tie to secure the caliper to the upper arm so it was out of the way, there's a 10mm bolt securing the ABS sensor on. With the brake disc removed from the hub next are the three castle nuts for the upper and lower ball joints and track rod end. Two of these had their own R clip and one split pin. A few hits with the hammer and they're released (I left the castle nuts on by a couple of turns), the track rod ends gave me the most grief and I may have nipped the boots (oops). Fitting is the reversal and is very quick and easy to do. The lower ball joints are held onto the hub by 2x 17mm bolts. The castle nut did increase in socket size to 22mm from memory (this may vary from supplier) The two front tyres weren't in great condition, so I had those replaced with some budget tyres for the time being. I'll be replacing the wheels and tyres in the future, this was to get me on the road without the worry of the police hassling me.
    • Yep, the closest base tune available was for the GTT, I went with that and made all the logical changes I could find to convert it to Naturally Aspirated. It will rev fine in Neutral to redline but it will be cutting nearly 50% fuel the whole way.  If I let it tune the fuel map to start with that much less fuel it wont run right and has a hard time applying corrections.  These 50% cuts are with a fuel map already about half of what the GTT tune had.  I was having a whole lot of bogging when applying any throttle but seem to have fixed that for no load situations with very aggressive transient throttle settings. I made the corrections to my injectors with data I found for them online, FBCJC100 flowing 306cc.  I'll have to look to see if I can find the Cam section. I have the Bosch 4.9 from Haltech. My manifold pressure when watching it live is always in -5.9 psi/inHg
    • Hi My Tokico BM50 Brake master cylinder has a leak from the hole between the two outlets (M10x1) for brake pipes, I have attached a photo. Can anyone tell me what that hole is and what has failed to allow brake fluid to escape from it, I have looked on line and asked questions on UK forums but can not find the answer, if anyone can enlighten me I would be most grateful.
    • It will be a software setting. I don't believe many on here ever used AEM. And they're now a discontinued product,that's really hard to find any easy answers on. If it were Link or Haltech, someone would be able to just send you a ECU file though.
×
×
  • Create New...