Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hello all,

so ive put this problem up before but nobody could figure it out, no mechanics here in NZ can figure it out either.

IN A GALAXY FAR FAR AWAY...........

I bought an STI WRX from auckland (auckland being at sea level) with the usual extras, the most notable one being the aftermarket Link computer, and brought it down to queenstown where i live (about 400m above sea level).

When it started getting warmer after winter (air getting warmer/thinner) the car started running rich, popping, backfiring, fouling plugs. sold it about 1 1/2 years later cause no one could fix it

I bought a GTR from auckland, usual extras, power fc etc. same problem, starts running richer when i get it to queenstown, got a Link put in it when i got it more heavily modifed and it fouls plugs real quick.

first thing in the morning the car is un-driveable, i took it to my mechanic yesterday (in christchurch sea level) where he said it started and ran perfectly, he is going to retune it and lean it off, as the first was tune was rich (safe)

i know that the sensors should adjust to the atmospheric conditions, but whats the problem?

ive spent so much coin on this car, and dont want to sell it

any advice/help would be great

cheers robbie

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/268608-gtr-million-dollar-question/
Share on other sites

Got same prob but at a smaller scale.. I live in Sweden, cars running in Japan runs great, gets here and then goes rich and/or eats up sparkplugs, guess its due to other air conditions, density, temperature etc.

Could you please send the million in Swedish krones? 1 000 000,00 AUD gives 6 136 000,00 SEK.

Thank you. .. ..... :P:D:):w00t:

Edited by brother_david

a difference of only 400 meters above sea level can be considered totally insignificant so far as air pressure / density is concerned

you need to look elsewhere - dodgy fuel is one possibility among about several .............

lol

a difference of only 400 meters above sea level can be considered totally insignificant so far as air pressure / density is concerned

you need to look elsewhere - dodgy fuel is one possibility among about several .............

lol

hey i think you may be right, queenstown i think i have heard gets alot of shit fuel? hmmmmmmmm, but than why did it start in christchuch the next day sweet as?

Edited by donkeypunch

hello

we need more information to be able to work out what is wrong, but it sounds like, without no further information you have a map sensor based setup thats been tuned in different atmospheric conditions, so when you move the car to a large variance in atmospheric pressure, the tune is off-whack

this is certainly possible with mathematics to occur, but i am unsure how much pressure difference sea level is vs 400m above

at sea level pressure we are 1 bar or 735mmhg or 94.8kpa

at 400mb above pressure we are 711mmhg or 99.4kpa

so its enough to drive a change in the map sensor by 5% difference

depending on how its tuned, may make it run like a bucket off poo

so

with your current setup is it AFM or map sensor?

if its link, we are assuming Map sensor

when you had the powerfc, was it AFM or Djetro?

did you have any issues with the powerfc?

if you did have issues, what setup was it,? afm or djetro?

but i would hope in the real world, a 5% pressure change, wouldnt make the car run like a bucket of crap

that would seem unreasonable, so it could be a poor state of tune, or a very quick and nasty tune?

i woudl expect a typical map sensor / djetro system would compensate for a pressure change such as yours

much like an AFM would when temperature changes from summer to winter etc

hello

we need more information to be able to work out what is wrong, but it sounds like, without no further information you have a map sensor based setup thats been tuned in different atmospheric conditions, so when you move the car to a large variance in atmospheric pressure, the tune is off-whack

this is certainly possible with mathematics to occur, but i am unsure how much pressure difference sea level is vs 400m above

at sea level pressure we are 1 bar or 735mmhg or 94.8kpa

at 400mb above pressure we are 711mmhg or 99.4kpa

so its enough to drive a change in the map sensor by 5% difference

depending on how its tuned, may make it run like a bucket off poo

so

with your current setup is it AFM or map sensor?

if its link, we are assuming Map sensor

when you had the powerfc, was it AFM or Djetro?

did you have any issues with the powerfc?

if you did have issues, what setup was it,? afm or djetro?

hey paul33,

this is what im talking about, cheers for the reply, yes the power fc had AFM's, it is now running the new Link G4 with map sensors, and yes you are correct it was tuned in christchurch at sea level, and as i posted it started perfect this morning in christchurch, but where i live in queenstown (400m above sea level) it starts badly.

when i got the car back from christchurch about 6 months ago it ran real well for about 3 mths, then started running badly. just before i took it to the drag race meet i put new plugs in it, it ran perfect. i did the plugs in while engine was hot so it wouldnt run full choke and foul them, drove about 25k, did about 7 passes drove home, did about another 30k, plugs fouled

Edited by donkeypunch

should not do that at 400m, i have used cars here in dandenong that live / compete on mt buller and mt Isa (google that one :) ) and the differrence is enough to effect the tune but not enough to foul plugs. It should be factored for though.

Edited by URAS

Isn't the benefit of a F/I car that it can detect the pressure and temp difference and adjust as required the basemap?

We were cranking 6000ft, or 1800m density altitude (pressure altitude adjusted for temperature) in Toowoomba the other day, that's not crazy unusual for here and cars run fine at the top or bottom of the range.

Isn't the benefit of a F/I car that it can detect the pressure and temp difference and adjust as required the basemap?

We were cranking 6000ft, or 1800m density altitude (pressure altitude adjusted for temperature) in Toowoomba the other day, that's not crazy unusual for here and cars run fine at the top or bottom of the range.

hey thanks for that

but i would hope in the real world, a 5% pressure change, wouldnt make the car run like a bucket of crap

that would seem unreasonable, so it could be a poor state of tune, or a very quick and nasty tune?

shouldn't do that over a pissy 400m...

was the tune in summer on a hot day?

logically if you think about it, as trent said, the buller hillclimb is a vertical kilometre.... and my car runs that bottom to top no worries

from the little info we have I would say it's a poor tune. simple as that. the car should not run poorly over a change in altitude of 400m.

cool thanks for that, if i get the new dyno readout could you guys let me know if it is a bad tune or not?

cheers

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
×
×
  • Create New...