Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Everything up to (but not including) Iron Chef's thread has been pretty much spot on.

rotors are fun and very reliable if treated correctly. In fact in racing circles, I've read more stories of RB26's dropping their guts than rotaries. My RX2 rally car has the same engine it had in it over 6 years ago. I do an oil change after every big event, and warm it up properly before racing. Other than that, I drive it like I stole it. Have had the temp gauge on the wrong side of 120 deg C a few times when I was popping fan belts, and had other major cooling issues (all fixed now), and it still runs fine.

Big carbied and ported rotors can be cantankerous in traffic and not much fun as a daily. An EFI 13B will still haul arse in an early RX, and be reliable and very easy to live with.

Yes, the rotary scene draws a lot of wankers, but so does the WRX scene, import scene, v8 scene etc.

Contrary to a lot of peoples opionon, i tried to kill mine for a year and it wouldnt die.

True that, If I could choose again I would never have sold my ser.3 RX7 to buy the skyline.

I'm on my 3rd motor in 2years of owning the skyline, In the 2 years I had the rotor (which was over 200,000ks old) it didnt miss a beat and it often saw 9500rpm+

Infact seeing this thread makes me want to go buy another 1st gen RX7 for a track car

A mate who knew nothing about cars bought a S2 RX-7 at an auction, then came by to show me his cool car...

The conversation started like this...

Me: You bought a rotary!

Him: What's a rotary...?

He learnt quite quickly that if he missed services stuff broke, and I can remember a $1k+ bill to re run all the oil lines.

It was quite thirsty from memory, but a shed load of fun to drive and always had classic looks.

My favourite rotary quote : "Rotaries, great to drive, not to own"

Jamie

a long time ago I had an Rx2 that I used for pizza delivery. It was pretty good on fuel as I had tuned it well. Extend port 12A.

Had a few rotors over time and as already mentioned they aren't for knuckle heads. They are really reliable if warmed up and treated right. This isn't expensive to do either.

As a daily they are fine if you do your research and learn how to keep them.

Everything up to (but not including) Iron Chef's thread has been pretty much spot on.

rotors are fun and very reliable if treated correctly. In fact in racing circles, I've read more stories of RB26's dropping their guts than rotaries. My RX2 rally car has the same engine it had in it over 6 years ago. I do an oil change after every big event, and warm it up properly before racing. Other than that, I drive it like I stole it. Have had the temp gauge on the wrong side of 120 deg C a few times when I was popping fan belts, and had other major cooling issues (all fixed now), and it still runs fine.

Big carbied and ported rotors can be cantankerous in traffic and not much fun as a daily. An EFI 13B will still haul arse in an early RX, and be reliable and very easy to live with.

Yes, the rotary scene draws a lot of wankers, but so does the WRX scene, import scene, v8 scene etc.

lol I was wondering how long it would take for the rotary Nazis to wander in here and start defending the reliability of their motors.

I've owned an R100, two RX-3s, a 13B turbo RX-2 (Fast Fours Project Pizza Delivery, for those old enough to remember), a S1 RX-7 and a S8 RX-7, so I'd say I'm in a reasonable position to comment.

There's a lot more to owning an old school rotor than how reliable the motor is (for the record, they're just as reliable as any other motor when serviced at the correct intervals).

Firstly, the fuel consumption is woeful - I defy any rotary owner to tell me otherwise. If you're going to spend 90% of your time stuck in traffic, you're better off keeping the rotor for weekend thrashes and buying something cheap and economical as a daily.

Secondly, as someone mentioned before, you're talking about 30 year old cars these days - parts are difficult to come by, and expensive to purchase when you do. For your own survival as much as anything else, make sure all the safety-related components have been modified (suspension, brakes etc) because hitting something at high speed in one would be far more disastrous than if you were in a car built in the last 10 years.

Thirdly, I wouldn't be leaving them in a public car park if you wanted to see the car still there when you finished work. You can install all the alarms in the world, but that doesn't change the fact that any 15 year old with a length of blue packing tape could be inside your car in under 20 secs. They were designed in a time where theft (in Japan at least) wasn't a very big issue.

My search in Japan still continues for an R130 Luce :blush:

the fuel consumption is woeful - I defy any rotary owner to tell me otherwise.

I beg to differ, it is not "WOEFUL", it's worse than that.

My old 13b bp i got down to about 16ltr/100k in normal driving, having fun was 20+

Edited by W0rp3D
lol I was wondering how long it would take for the rotary Nazis to wander in here and start defending the reliability of their motors.

Haha nazi - ur funny :P If only you knew.

Well, since he asked about their reliability, I answered him.

I gather from the OP he's after something "old school", ie a bit different from your mundane shopping trolley, otherwise he would be looking at a late 90's Camry. Cheap, reliable, safe, cheap, economical and cheap. Can't go past one for a daily.

Of course if you want something "old school cool" then be prepared to put up with old technology, rare and expensive parts, poor crash safety, and high fuel costs. I don't think that's restricted to rotaries only.

16l/100km? pffft. I bank on about 75L/100km on special stages, and about 20L/100km on liaison. Of course I avoid driving it on the roads at any other time as much as possible (because it's a dog in traffic)

I had a series 1 rx7 for about a year. Was a fun little project car that i couldnt kill.

Sure might have been very thirsty on fuel but was a hell of a lot of fun and very reliable.

I would happily get another one

daily needs to be reliable, have power steer, air con, decent radio, electric windows and mirrors.

so rx2/3/4 is not really going to fit any of those.

would no doubt be a fun weekend car if you like rotaries but a rubbish daily.

daily needs to have power steer

Not neccessarily, depends on the driver. Have owned many non-power steering cars. Some of them are a pain, but I found the series one RX7 I had to be quite light in steering at slow speeds.

daily needs to have air con, decent radio, electric windows and mirrors.

All of the above are optional - in Tasmania I don't really care about air con, want air conditioning? Wind down a window. When I move to brisbane my opinion may change :D

Radio can easily be wired up, particularly easily in an older car takes an hour if your handy with a soldering iron, personally I prefer a simple stereo anyway.

Electric windows and mirrors and so on are good in a way but when you don't have them you don't care that you don't have them. If it truly bothers the owner anyone can fit a electric window kit quite easily. Have never cared about electric mirrors apart from thinking "Thats handy!"

Depends on what you want in a daily. At the moment I want comfort, inconspicousness (my fault that one entirely) and a touch of grunt - hence the turbo pulsar. If you want an old fashioned daily you don't particularly put that much emphasis on modern convenience. Hell, I don't put much emphasis on modern convenience even when I have it.

Its a personal thing really if you have to have modern kit you have to have it, if you couldn't care you couldn't care. I'm on the couldn't care side.

All this talk of RX-7's and rotaries has made me want to buy another - I'm already flicking through classifieds. 

its interesting i thought as soon as i saw a rotary thread on a nissan site all i would see would be how rubbish and unreliable they are blah blah blah You seem to get that alot, people just choose to think they are a peice of shit without knowing a thing about them, Personally ive only had 1 engine in need of rebuild as a split in the oil line has lost oil pressure and the motor was toast. But not bad considering ive had 12a turbo s1 rx7, 13bept s4, 13bept s5, 13bbp series2 rx2, 13bep 808 sedan, 13bbp rx3 sedan,12a bp rotary van, 12amp 323 and current 20bbp, tripple throttle bodies etc rx2 sedan. Great fun,, small, powerfull and out of controll!

as far as a daily goes just a standard 12a or 13b wouldnt be too bad just keep the 4 barrel and go easy on the secondarys, and once you hooked your f**kt

its interesting i thought as soon as i saw a rotary thread on a nissan site all i would see would be how rubbish and unreliable they are blah blah blah You seem to get that alot, people just choose to think they are a peice of shit without knowing a thing about them

Most of the poeple on here are a lot more mature and enjoy different cars for their different attributes regardless of what we drive.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • And if it still spikes, just for now, turn off VCT completely by disabling it OR simply unplug the solenoid. Just to rule out excessive exhaust pressure. I recall a video from Motive DVD about a decade ago, where Hawkins original single Garrett GTX3582 or so turbo had boost control issues sub 1.4bar of boost as well.   Food for thought? Is there anyway you can peg the WG completely open and/or dodgily not plumb it back into your exhaust system for testing purposes?
    • I will endeavour to give it a crack sooner or later. I have the wastegate apart at the moment so I'll replace it with a smaller spring just to see what it does and if I have to go back then so be it.   If it spikes to 23 but can then be controlled back to 20, then the gate must not be 100% open... So if it's not 100% open then why can't it drop the boost even further than 20psi (I understand it's not linear). What a headache this whole thing is.
    • Either the WG is reaching full opening, or it is not. The "it is not" case could only occur if there was not enough time available to swing the valve fully open during that boost event. I would consider that to be unlikely, as this is a commercial product that is in use elsewhere, so it really should work. But in your case, because there is definitely SOMETHING wrong, it should not be assumed that things like that are working as they should. You should put a video camera where it can see the actuator (if at all possible) during a run to see how far it is moving.
    • I think you're mostly on the ball there. With the straight gate, I suspect the weight of the spring will determine how quickly the gate can close, when not run with active pressure drive on both sides of the diaphragm. Otherwise, with drive on both sides of the diaphragm, you could almost go without a spring at all, only needing one to make sure that the thing was actually closed while completely off boost and not having pressure available to drive it closed. Butterfly valves have mostly symmetric loading when there is flow going through them, meaning that the gas hitting the upstream part of the blade is balanced by the gas hitting the downstream part of the blade, which means you don't need actuator torque to overcome any non-symmetric flow induced loads. But the gas flow does impart a purely normal load against the shaft, which transfers into the bush/bearing at each end of the shaft and does increase the torque required to make the shaft turn. Only a little, but it is there. I have no feeling for the amount of force involved in a WG application, but it certainly could make an argument for a decent spring weight being required. But all of this is just peripheral to the actual problem here.
    • The answer to this would be I followed the documentation from Turbosmart which said each spring pressure could achieve a maximum of 5x it's rated pressure so the included smallest spring being the 6psi had a range up to 30psi. I went with the 12 because I figured it'd likely hover around 15psi as a base pressure however I was obviously wrong.    I have a log here that I'll dig out that is purely wastegate and no Mac valve controlling anything.   If it can't hold anywhere near 12psi, does that mean the straight gate is virtually wide open during a run? Or am I thinking about this all wrong.   I could Tee Piece into the cooler pipe pre intercooler where the wastegate gets its feed, and send that to the ecu and see how that reads, I just don't have a spare pressure sensor currently that's all.
×
×
  • Create New...