Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Footage quality looks great, whats your thoughts on Radcam vs POV Ben?

I have a POV 1.5 but was contemplating on a second cam, the video quality from the Radcam no doubt eclipses that of the POV and even the first clip you posted I assume was using the inbuilt mic? (if so the onboard audio seemed to be a bit better than that of the POV) just wondering if there are any issues that you have found with the Radcam that you don't like?

Also I guess it's a bit harder to edit and upload the HD footage than it is with the POV?

In my mind, the Pov is still a great bit of gear, very sturdy and proven. But, time marches on and HD is really so much more enjoyable to watch.

So, the Radcam fits the bill, and I'm getting more familiar with it now. Editing is no harder, I just needed to set my editing default to widescreen hd.

It also comes with excellent mounts, but lacks a little battery life though compared to Pov. You Can however charge if from the car and I'll do that and ad a noise suppressor, or simply install the supplied charger for the second battery in the car.

A minor design fault is the lipstick cam clamp, the little rubber band supplied gets cut very quickly because the plastic moulding is sharp. Easy fixed by either a small file or using a zip tie.

Overall I'm very happy with it and think its really quite good value.

Well, I did miss an Evo 7 on Ebay saturday by $100 :down:

Video quality on that is quite cool.

slightly unrelated but,

How would you compare the finer points of a 32 GT-R with an EVO 5 Marlin ?

in a circuit racing context I mean, outright pace, effectiveness of development etc ?

Just interested to see what people with experience think as a good mate of mine has a 5 on the boat from japan at the moment and I think we're going to do swapsies.

Cheers,

Mitch.

Mate, I haven't driven a 32 GTR in real anger for a long time now..... My 32 is a GTS-t, and at risk of getting flamed, I enjoy it much more than a comparably quick GTR. The gts is just so much lighter on its feet. Couple of guys who own GTR's get out of mine beaming with how much fun it is, all citing how might lighter and responsive it is.

The Evo 5 is a good thing, but quite one dimensional in its performance. A similarly modified 32 GTR will be much more satisfying to punt, but I'm sorry to say, it won't be as quick as an Evo 5/6 unless you're at a circuit that remards horsepower.

The key I guess is that weight is everything (well, nearly) in any form of track car..... early Evo's are light, as is my GTS.... GTR's are fairly heavy things, but can make big HP numbers. It's up to you work out what you enjoy more.

Mate, I haven't driven a 32 GTR in real anger for a long time now..... My 32 is a GTS-t, and at risk of getting flamed, I enjoy it much more than a comparably quick GTR. The gts is just so much lighter on its feet. Couple of guys who own GTR's get out of mine beaming with how much fun it is, all citing how might lighter and responsive it is.

The Evo 5 is a good thing, but quite one dimensional in its performance. A similarly modified 32 GTR will be much more satisfying to punt, but I'm sorry to say, it won't be as quick as an Evo 5/6 unless you're at a circuit that remards horsepower.

The key I guess is that weight is everything (well, nearly) in any form of track car..... early Evo's are light, as is my GTS.... GTR's are fairly heavy things, but can make big HP numbers. It's up to you work out what you enjoy more.

That cool mate, cheers for your response.

It's a bit of fun at the moment because we are giving each other a bit of shit about who's going to chop who ;)

The GT-R seems to have the better times over the longer more open tracks(nurburgring), whereas the EVO is all over it at places like tsukuba where it's super tight.

I agree with your sentiments about the weight with the EVO coming in a little under 100kg lighter, but on the flip side the GT-R has 600cc on it so it will be interesting to see.

the chassis rigidity of the EVO will be its major performance advantage over me, I feel that some underbody bracing/caging etc will go along well to helping me out as I look for more performance.

some minor details that might help clarify.

EVO

235 ku36

230AWKW

HKS Coilovers

few other bits, here and there.

GT-R

No sound deadening, No hicas.

Underbody braces.

255 Ku36

350AWKW

suspension will be Tein SS or comparable with Swaybars and castor rods maybe LCA's

we are brisbane boys so tracks will be Lakeside, QR and Willowbank :)

Might seem a bit stacked but he also has a EVO II RS stripped and caged with ~280kw that Ill probably have to end up chasing :)

although there is a sheep station for first price, realistically, the enjoyment aspect is what it's all about and I wouldn't sell my GT-R for anything.

Reckon I'm biting off more then I can chew ? haha

Cheers,

Mitch.

The GTR will be hobbled by that rubber.

And why is the Emo on such small rubber? We run 265's on Giant's.

As far as I know, It's what he's putting on it after it goes through compliance.

He has a nice set of 8" Enkei tarmacs they are going on.

And I figured that a 255 would be a reasonable size for my apexi 17x9's you think bigger ? the KU36 is sort of an equaliser, not at all ideal i know but rules is rules eh macca ?

Edited by Nee-san
haha, well Macca, I'd be running as big as I could! 10" with 285's on the 32, and 9" with 265 on the Emo..... :) Big rubber makes up for a thousand other shortcomings ;) lol

haha, bloody wheels, theres nothing decent in 10" under 3 grand, Atleast they will fit over my sweet standard brakes :)

Think I might see how We go seeing as we're both under tyred and hope having an assload more power will get me over the line.

May the force be with me, so on so forth.

The key I guess is that weight is everything (well, nearly) in any form of track car..... early Evo's are light, as is my GTS.... GTR's are fairly heavy things, but can make big HP numbers. It's up to you work out what you enjoy more.

didn't really work for me!

JZA80 Supra 1530kg Stock turbos, stock boost (10psi) with cat-back + pod = maybe 180rwkw, if that! I ran it in TTC mode rather than sequential, but that's just to even out the midrange rather than having to deal with the thing going single to twin all the time at about 4000rpm. It doesn't make any more power. KU36 tyres. Stock brakes. Tein coilovers with off the shelf springs. The only suspension tweaks I made were ride heights and maxing out camber on the front with the stock eccentric adjusters. 60.7 Lakeside

180SX 1250kg HKS GTSS, Pfc, 15psi 200rwkw on the dyno. R888 semis. R32 GTR brakes. Bolt-in cage. Tein coilovers, adjustable fking everything to get rid of rear bump steer, repeatedly messing around with spring rates chasing a good balance, 59.9 Lakeside.

Why is the more powerful, much lighter 180SX on better rubber only 8tenths faster? FIIK! On paper it should be seconds faster... That was certainly what I had in mind when I sold the Supra and bought the S13. I have no doubt the Supra on equal rubber would have been quicker, and it was almost stock. Imagine how it would have gone with a FMIC and the boost wound up...

I'm a bit annoyed with the 180SX

Well harry, as always mate, you're a bit different :);)

I agree though, your 180 really should be quicker than is it, it's not your driving, I know that, gotta be somethin funky with that car..... with the suspension changes in it, it really should be quicker than my thing around there. Have you tried driving the 180 a bit "straighter"?

I also think Lakeside is a track that suits the Supra, as you well know it's fast and flowing, doesn't really give massive advantage to big hp cars, it's all about keeping the flow.

yeah, mum always said I was special... but you want different - how about an Aristo with a race seat?

believe it or not, I tried to be smooth in my shootout lap. And that's where I got the 59.9. Apart from coming into Hungry a little hot and with a bit too much trail, that's as smooth as I get...

I think its handling OK. I'm not exactly a fan of the R888s, but they have to be better than the KU36 the Supra was on. I can't explain it. Maybe you should pedal it around out there - see what you think...

The GTR will be hobbled by that rubber.

And why is the Emo on such small rubber? We run 265's on Giant's.

You won't fit any wider than 235's onto a 4-6 without making a few major changes. I have trouble running any wider than 225's on my 6.5 without them cutting into the guards.

You won't fit any wider than 235's onto a 4-6 without making a few major changes. I have trouble running any wider than 225's on my 6.5 without them cutting into the guards.

That black evo does some pretty sweet times for only 180AWKW Hence my worry haha.

How would you compare the finer points of a 32 GT-R with an EVO 5 Marlin ?

in a circuit racing context I mean, outright pace, effectiveness of development etc ?

Just interested to see what people with experience think as a good mate of mine has a 5 on the boat from japan at the moment and I think we're going to do swapsies.

the GTR is definately quicker stock for stock...we race a few in NSW production cars and the EMO 5 is slower, by a second or 2. Emo 9/10 is a different matter. That is all on standard size wheels and standard boost though.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
    • Hi,  Just joined the forum so I could share my "fix" of this problem. Might be of use to someone. Had the same hunting at idle issue on my V36 with VQ35HR engine after swapping the engine because the original one got overheated.  While changing the engine I made the mistake of cleaning the throttle bodies and tried all the tricks i could find to do a throttle relearn with no luck. Gave in and took it to a shop and they couldn't sort it. Then took it to my local Nissan dealership and they couldn't get it to idle properly. They said I'd need to replace the throttle bodies and the ecu probably costing more than the car is worth. So I had the idea of replacing the carbon I cleaned out with a thin layer of super glue and it's back to normal idle now. Bit rough but saved the car from the wreckers 🤣
    • After my last update, I went ahead with cleaning and restoring the entire fuel system. This included removing the tank and cleaning it with the Beyond Balistics solution, power washing it multiple times, drying it thoroughly, rinsing with IPA, drying again with heat gun and compressed air. Also, cleaning out the lines, fuel rail, and replacing the fuel pump with an OEM-style one. During the cleaning process, I replaced several hoses - including the breather hose on the fuel tank, which turned out to be the cause of the earlier fuel leak. This is what the old fuel filter looked like: Fuel tank before cleaning: Dirty Fuel Tank.mp4   Fuel tank after cleaning (some staining remains): Clean Fuel Tank.mp4 Both the OEM 270cc and new DeatschWerks 550cc injectors were cleaned professionally by a shop. Before reassembling everything, I tested the fuel flow by running the pump output into a container at the fuel filter location - flow looked good. I then fitted the new fuel filter and reassembled the rest of the system. Fuel Flow Test.mp4 Test 1 - 550cc injectors Ran the new fuel pump with its supplied diagonal strainer (different from OEM’s flat strainer) and my 550cc injectors using the same resized-injector map I had successfully used before. At first, it idled roughly and stalled when I applied throttle. Checked the spark plugs and found that they were fouled with carbon (likely from the earlier overly rich running when the injectors were clogged). After cleaning the plugs, the car started fine. However, it would only idle for 30–60 seconds before stalling, and while driving it would feel like a “fuel cut” after a few seconds - though it wouldn’t fully stall. Test 2 – Strainer swap Suspecting the diagonal strainer might not be reaching the tank bottom, I swapped it for the original flat strainer and filled the tank with ~45L of fuel. The issue persisted exactly the same. Test 3 – OEM injectors To eliminate tuning variables, I reinstalled the OEM 270cc injectors and reverted to the original map. Cleaned the spark plugs again just in-case. The stalling and “fuel cut” still remained.   At this stage, I suspect an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, caused during the cleaning process. This has led me to look into getting Frenchy’s fuel hanger and replacing the unit entirely. TL;DR: Cleaned and restored the fuel system (tank, lines, rail, pump). Tested 550cc injectors with the same resized-injector map as before, but the car stalls at idle and experiences what feels like “fuel cut” after a few seconds of driving. Swapped back to OEM injectors with original map to rule out tuning, but the issue persists. Now suspecting an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, possibly cause by the cleaning process.  
×
×
  • Create New...