Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hay guys why do the Formula one teams cool the fuel down before it goes into the cars ?

And i was reading that fuel pump is cooled by the fuel passing throught it so would it warm up the fuel ?

Wont this do the opposite to what the formula 1 teams try to do i assume that they cool the fuel down because it makes more power some how which you guys will hopefully

be able to help me with.

The fuel pump warms the fuel up so it makes all the cars less efficent if the fuel is warmer ?

I assume that it makes the the air intake temps lower as it is sprayed into the piston is that what cold fuel dose ?

Edited by cm712
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/272921-cool-fuel-in-f1/
Share on other sites

Id say so its more dense thus you can fit more into the tank. Kinda the same as they recommend u fill up in the morning.

Bingo.

More Dense Fuel = More Fuel In tank

Although a lot of the benefit would be wiped out in the engine bay unless you could insulate the fuel lines from heat, keeping the fuel cool means you could fit more into the cylinders too.

More Fuel in Cylinders = Higher Compression = More power.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/272921-cool-fuel-in-f1/#findComment-4632604
Share on other sites

A few teams used to use fuel coolers in parc fermé overnight to stop fuel from evaporating out of the tank. This was when they weren't allowed to refuel between the end of qualifying and starting the race.

They'd cycle the fuel out through a chiller and pump it back in. I suppose when races are practically decided by fuel strategy, every last millilitre counts.

Otherwise, I'd opt for the density answer Skyrin3 said. Aside from being able to fit more in the tank, denser fuel means more fuel for a given volume. This means you can move more fuel over a certain length of time. In a competition settled in the thousandths of a second, refuelling a split second faster could also improve placings.

Colder fuel could theoretically increase power by cooling the charge air as it goes in, but I'm not sure if the fuel can really stay cold in the tank. I can't imagine its particularly cool anywhere in a F1 car, and with the refuelling neck behind the driver I can only assume the fuel tank is near the engine.

Edited by scathing
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/272921-cool-fuel-in-f1/#findComment-4632612
Share on other sites

A few teams used to use fuel coolers in parc fermé overnight to stop fuel from evaporating out of the tank. This was when they weren't allowed to refuel between the end of qualifying and starting the race.

They'd cycle the fuel out through a chiller and pump it back in. I suppose when races are practically decided by fuel strategy, every last millilitre counts.

Otherwise, I'd opt for the density answer Skyrin3 said. Aside from being able to fit more in the tank, denser fuel means more fuel for a given volume. This means you can move more fuel over a certain length of time. In a competition settled in the thousandths of a second, refuelling a split second faster could also improve placings.

Colder fuel could theoretically increase power by cooling the charge air as it goes in, but I'm not sure if the fuel can really stay cold in the tank. I can't imagine its particularly cool anywhere in a F1 car, and with the refuelling neck behind the driver I can only assume the fuel tank is near the engine.

by regulation in F1, the fuel tank must sit behind the driver, along with the oil tank (they are dry sump)

id love to see someone do some engineering along the lines of cold fuel vs. hot fuel and their effects on power.

i can imagine for turbo cars, colder fuels would decrease the chance of detonation... i.e. adding a 'tank cooler' would have similar effects to adding/having a bigger intercooler, thus allowing you to safely up the boost a little more.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/272921-cool-fuel-in-f1/#findComment-4632933
Share on other sites

the filling up with fuel in the morning thing is a bit of a myth. the tanks are underground so don't get affected by the heat of the day very much (or the cold overnight). in fact during the night they would be heated by the warmth of the ground in the same way that the houses in coober pedy are underground and don't require heating or cooling. also it takes a very large amount of energy to alter the temp of a large body of liquid that isn't getting direct sunlight. the other problem is that if you fill up on a cold morning your tank won't hold quite as much fuel (minutely smaller amount). this is because metal contracts (shrinks) when it is cold and expands when it is hot.

as for cooling the fuel in the lines, that would mean denser fuel.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/272921-cool-fuel-in-f1/#findComment-4633198
Share on other sites

by regulation in F1, the fuel tank must sit behind the driver, along with the oil tank (they are dry sump)

id love to see someone do some engineering along the lines of cold fuel vs. hot fuel and their effects on power.

i can imagine for turbo cars, colder fuels would decrease the chance of detonation... i.e. adding a 'tank cooler' would have similar effects to adding/having a bigger intercooler, thus allowing you to safely up the boost a little more.

I don't see how you're going to get more power from colder fuel?

It means you could "theoretically" run smaller injectors, but if you cool the fuel, and inject for the same amount of time, you've just richened the engine up...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/272921-cool-fuel-in-f1/#findComment-4634683
Share on other sites

From a BBC news article about some fuel cooler scandal back in 2007:

Cooler fuel can give a car a performance advantage.

It is denser, so it can take slightly less time to refuel a car or marginally more fuel can be added in the same time.

Cooler fuel would also give a slight power advantage for about three laps before returning to the temperature out on the track.

However, the total advantage for each car over the race distance was almost certainly no more than a second.

Former F1 team owner Eddie Jordan agrees that cars do gain an unfair advantage if they use cooler fuel.

"If you put chilled or cool fuel into a car you get between 5 and 10 horsepower increase," he told 5live

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/272921-cool-fuel-in-f1/#findComment-4634959
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...