Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys

Just looked at the gtr spoilers carmate have on their site

not too sure how the quality on these are like, has anyone bought them before?

pics are below

NSGTT99GTRLOWRW.jpgNSGTT99GTRMEDIUMRW.jpgR34--D--RSW.jpg

R34--D--RSW.jpg

apparently their all different heights.. not too sure on the quality and final look but they are a good price

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/274497-carmate-r34-gt-r-style-spoilers/
Share on other sites

carmate stuff i had a front bar didnt line up under drivers headlight, rear bar didnt fit correctly on the rear with gaps...lot of work but as said above with spoiler on two spots really need to line up for fitment so not much chance of problems compared to bars and skirts...pricing they are good quality just luck of the draw

my old r34 had a carmate spoiler on it, get the low mount one, it does get in the way of rear vision but it's not too bad

I've seen the high mount one on a GT-t and it was ridiculously high, funny looking

it did the job and the bolt holes lined up so I'm happy, that's as far as i'd go to putting fibreglass on my car personally, not a fan of fibreglass bodykits

DSC04263.jpg

DSC04264.jpg

Edited by Yo-Yo

Does the CarMate version have an adjustable rear fin?

I agree with getting the low-mount one only.

Since CarMate sell F/G, run your hand over it to check that there are no ripples. If it's smoooooooth, and once it's painted, no-one will know the difference if it's F/G or Plastic. Rear fin could have a C/F look to it (or bronze).

alright cheers guys, thanks for the pics

it looks like it'd turn out pretty good once fitted and sprayed, was worried about how the final product looked, but that looks fine

im currently using the stock gt wing, and even that gets in the way of the rear view mirror a bit, but not really a problem for me, but i'd definitely get the low one, it looks like a good height from the pictures too.

alright cheers guys, thanks for the pics

it looks like it'd turn out pretty good once fitted and sprayed, was worried about how the final product looked, but that looks fine

im currently using the stock gt wing, and even that gets in the way of the rear view mirror a bit, but not really a problem for me, but i'd definitely get the low one, it looks like a good height from the pictures too.

alright cheers guys, thanks for the pics

it looks like it'd turn out pretty good once fitted and sprayed, was worried about how the final product looked, but that looks fine

im currently using the stock gt wing, and even that gets in the way of the rear view mirror a bit, but not really a problem for me, but i'd definitely get the low one, it looks like a good height from the pictures too.

yeah i was wondering about that too, the carbon fibre look is great, looks like its meant to be

you can buy carbon fibre wrapping paper, but i doubt that was how it was done, it looks wayy too good for that

How sturdy is this thing ? Not sure it'd be so great if instead of creating downforce it ripped off and flew away into someone's windshield at high speed...

haha yeah i guess that is another thing to consider, it really cant be that bad though can it?

carmate is a pretty big site too, im sure they wouldnt sell stuff that is likely to fly off while driving .. or would they :|

R34P3R the pictures up on the first post of the pics go from low to highest. unfortunately they only show the high spoiler actually installed on the car. I prefer a low-medium spoiler personally, not really into ones that go too high.

to answer a few extra questions posed...

DSC04252.jpg

DSC04253.jpg

rear fin came c/f not real carbon but fibreglass with c/f top, kind of like how some c/f bonnets come.

wing was not adjustable, but at least it looked like it could lol

wing is sturdy, I live in western sydney so pot holes are a way of life, and I'm a lead foot too, it held up very well

that being said I am very iffy of carmates quality, as I said before that's as far as i'd go to putting fibreglass on my car

the wing was sturdy though so I was happy with it, you could place a bit of force with your hand in the middle of the wing and it wouldn't bend

I had it painted from a friend and fitted the wing myself, make sure you have some silicon or double sided tape to place around the bolt holes on the boot so no water leaks in

the only one that looks good is the low mount imo

Edited by Yo-Yo

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The ATTESSA is functionally identical to R34; there were a bunch of JDM models that continued ATTESSA including Fuga/Q70, Skyline/Q50, Cima etc as an option. All with Auto only and I think mostly for snow regions. AFAIK there were no AWD VR30DDTT sold in Australia - it is on my to do list to check regs for racing a LHD car in Targa/ATR/AASA/CAMS events because if I can get the auto to work it would be interesting to run a 4wd car The Ecuteck TCM tuning is the same model as their ECU tuning, they already have it for R35 and Dose's favourite, BMW. You buy "points" to allow your computer to be tuned, buy either a bluetooth (phone app) or bluetooth+USB+Key (phone and PC) dongle, and pay for a tune that will be locked to your tuner ( ). You can also access the tuning software yourself but 1. it is mega expensive and 2. these computers have a billion parameters that intersect, so how could you ever spend enough time on it to get a decent result.
    • Or, is it a case of what it is like owning an R series Skyline? NFI what the previous owner has done or fiddled with... Ha ha ha After reading through this thread, I went on a bit of a research about the Q50/Q60. Now I'm quite intrigued by them! Is the AWD in them more like a WRX where it's always AWD, or is it more like the ATTESSA in the GTRs? By the sound of this TCU tuning, this sounds like a case of someone has made some real software for it, and you just need the right piece of hardware, and then you license that specific vehicle/TCU. Or is this a case of the software will be really expensive so only a few tuners have it, and you still have to pay a license per vehicle?
    • By popular demand.. it was a coil. Got my hands on 1 new OEM coil, replaced with the one that made the less noise difference when I unplugged it while the car was running and started the car up. No stutter and the engine light was gone. I guess I’ll buy the other 5 they have lol
    • No, code 21 is very straightforward. It can only be the things described in that diagnostic flow. In fact it has no way of knowing that the spark plug resistance is out of spec.
    • Hi, SteveL Thank you very much for your reply, you seem to be the only person on the net who has come up with a definitive answer for which I am grateful. The "Leak" was more by way of wet bubbles when the pedal was depressed hard by a buddy while trying to gey a decent pedal when bleeding the system having fitted the rebuilt BM50 back in the car, which now makes perfect sense. A bit of a shame having just rebuilt my BM50, I did not touch the proportioning valve side of things, the BM50 was leaking from the primary piston seal and fluid was running down the the Brake booster hence the need to rebuild, I had never noticed any fluid leaking from that hole previously it only started when I refitted it to the car. The brake lines in the photo are "Kunifer" which is a Copper/Nickel alloy brake pipe, but are only the ones I use to bench bleed Master cylinders, they are perfectly legal to use on vehicles here in the UK, however the lines on the car are PVF coated steel. Thanks again for clearing this up for me, a purchase of a new BMC appears to be on the cards, I have been looking at various options in case my BM50 was not repairable and have looked at the HFM BM57 which I understand is manufactured in Australia.  
×
×
  • Create New...