Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yepp,

That looks about right. Shame it's in 3rd gear, although I'm not sure if it'd make a difference anyway.

That dip in power is normal for a GTS-t with a bit of boost. The dip get's worse as you wind up the boost :(

The A/F ratio's are also typical for a stock ECU. Running pretty rich up top.

Mine pulled 160 with the same mods but with a stock air box and a FMIC, so yours look pretty good.

Cheers

J

i got 153rwkw on 9psi with a power dip like that....

but thats with stock dump, 2.5" cat..only mod is a front pipe so there's more restriction in mine...

after teh AFC tune I got 190rwkw, still stock dump/cat

200rwkw with de-cat and dump pipe should be about right :(

Originally posted by Shane

- Stock ECU.

- Full 3" exhaust, Hi-flow Cat.

- Apexi Air Filter.

- 8-9 PSI

- Hot humid day, about 30.

Add a FMIC + Bosch 040 Fuel Pump + boost set to 12psi and you have my car... = 180rwkw

Originally posted by benm

Add a FMIC + Bosch 040 Fuel Pump + boost set to 12psi and you have my car... = 180rwkw

You may need to change the description you wrote about your car (just below your avtar). I'll let you know what mine is running tommorow evening - putting it on the dyno tommorow arvo

Good to here its about average.

Dual boost controller is set up for about 10PSI at the moment but needs a bit more adjustment.

I'm attempting the FMIC install tomorrow, should open her up a bit! If all goes well I'll post some pics of the ghetto home job :(

Mark let us know how yours go's with the new Turb's?

My 96 Gtst has similar mods, Pod filter, Intercooler (large), HKS EVC boost controller set to 0.75 bar or 10.5psi, 3" exhaust all the way, plus hi flow cat and pulled 190kw at rear wheels. I will post my chart up once I get the pic scanned as my scanner ain't working.

Anyone else pulling similar power figures.

My engine has done only 60,000km. It also made 203kw at 0.90 bar, but they advised me I had a more reliable long term package this way with less boost especially for the turbos sake.

Paul:burnout:

Since power is simply a measuring of rate of work, it shouldn't matter to a great extent what gear the car is in. The engine still revs from 0 to redline whether you're in 3rd gear or reverse. There are some slight differences because engines respond differently according to load, but it shouldn't matter too much. As long as you do each dyno run in the same gear each time you will be able to get the tuning right.

The reason why Skylines (and similar Jap cars) usually get dyno'd in 3rd gear is because in 4th they can run into the 180kph speed limiter.

How much difference are we talking here though? If a car has say 200rwkw in 3rd gear, what would it have in 4th?

Edit: Hmm, maybe I'm not understanding this power thing then. I know that lower gears give you more torque, but you have less top speed. So in theory the power should work out to around the same in a taller gear, because you have less torque but more top speed. Someone educate me!

That's pretty good with 146 rwkw.

But just one question to all you guys here that has had their car dyno.

I have been reading some other threads on this forum and it has come to my attention that not all Dyno has the same reading.

Like your car might be 146 rwkw on this dyno but on someone else it might be more or less.

If this is so, how can we really compare our difference in kw output as we all would have dyno our cars on different machine?

See that is what I don't really get, isn't there like a standard for these dyno machine so that even if they are set different, on a special mode it would be relatively the same standard as the next machine. Or is that what the 'Shoot-out mode' is for?

It is just weird and don't really make much sense to me.

As I soon will want to dyno my car but whether how accurate it is, that is my question.

Originally posted by skylineakt

I have been reading some other threads on this forum and it has come to my attention that not all Dyno has the same reading.

Like your car might be 146 rwkw on this dyno but on someone else it might be more or less.

If this is so, how can we really compare our difference in kw output as we all would have dyno our cars on different machine?

We can't :rolleyes: This has been discussed and argued about many many times before here and everywhere else dynos are discussed. The best you can get from them is a rough guide. Most of them seem to be roughly within 10% of each other, so it's pretty obvious that a car with 250rwkw is going to be a lot more powerful than a different car running 150rwkw on a different dyno.

Generally speaking of course, because you can callibrate the dyno to read whatever you like. But if the second car was "tweaked" to read 250rwkw, it would be pretty obvious that it wasn't legit just by going for a ride in the car. Or even looking at some of the mods.

Even a 1/4 mile time can't accurately judge how much power you've got, because there are considerations such as driver skill, suspension setup, tyres, and sometimes just luck (good or bad). But again, it can give you a pretty good idea. ie, a Skyline running 11 seconds definitely is not stock.

Comparing power outputs is just a pissing match anyway, so I'm kind of glad that you can't compare dyno readings directly.

Originally posted by Steve

Well imagine if you had 300nm of torque at 150kmh, if you had the same 300nm at 200kph, power would be lower.

I am not sure exactly how much difference it makes, just does make some difference.

I realise that, but say you were in redline at 3rd gear and doing say 100kph. At redline in 4th you would be putting less torque to the ground but the speed would be higher, which would indicate the same amount of work being done (just geared differently).

Down low the power readings will be lower in the taller gear but I would think that the peak power should be roughly the same no matter what gear you are in.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah it is always worth testing and balancing actuators out of the box, just set the pressure regulator on a compressor very low (eg 5 psi) and increase it slowly to see when they both move.....unfortunately while you may be able to adjust the length of the actuator rod to minimise any difference, the actual pressure they move from is not adjustable so you need a well matched pair. And yes, the VCAM is probably contributing; the earlier in the rev range they come on boost and the slower the revs build (I think your demo was in 5th), the more you notice it.  Driving at WOT through 1st, 2nd, 3rd etc you will probably never hear it as any shuffling starts and is over super quickly
    • oh they were with that motor, you need to remove the engine to change the spark plugs (don't have to, but it does make it easier)
    • I certainly fall into the annoyed camp, but glad to hear that if it's happening at low boost then I'm not likely going to blow a turbo and end up with metal shards in my oil. Just feels like it prevents me from really driving it without hesitation and "peak" performance. Wonder if it's the VCAM, it did an impressive job of shifting the torque curve and faster spool, but maybe now it's "too fast" and there's too much air for how open the throttle is.  Based on some other threads, will also do some reading on synchronizing the actuators. They are the default actuators that come on the Garrett's and I would think they would be set the same coming from the factory, but if the turbos don't actually work exactly the same way at the same time as previously mentioned, it would be worth making sure the actuators are actuating together properly
    • I went down this rabbit hole before, ended up sourcing a motor from the UK (I'm in Japan) which also didn't function correctly. With the original motor, I disassembled it and reassembled it and it works somewhat, sometimes. What I could deduce from all my screwing around is that there is calibration of the gears on the inside of the motor and two ramps on the main gear which activate switches that operate the motor and move the sunroof either to retract into the roof or tilt. Where I got stuck was that, it seemed in my case that one or both of the switches that are activated by the ramp on the gear did not always activate and thus the motor did not move, causing it to sometimes not retract or tilt (apologies, I've forgotten which way it didn't work.).  Of course this part is discontinued at Nissan now, it's the same part in the S15 but no other models. I also contacted the manufacturer of the component for schematics - forgot the name, they're based in Gifu - but they declined to share the information due to being bound by an NDA, sadly. Looking through my pictures now, it seems I last had a crack at this in 2022. See, I so kindly wrote "open" and "close" next to the switches. If you figure it out, please do tell me. Those little switches, with the red buttons may need to be replaced.
×
×
  • Create New...