why do R32 GTs-t's....

[Nismo_Boy]

why do r32's still bring high price's? I was on tradingpost.com, and the cheapest was like $16,500, and some were still in the $20,000....

[Nismo_Boy]

BTW, this was in the QLD trading post

[Squizz]

because they ****ing rock

[Nismo_Boy]

Originally posted by Squizz

because they ****ing rock

fair enough

[Guest MRE]

They also are great for paddock bashing

[[ABU53]]

Well, anyone who has driven a 32 GTS-T (or a GTS-4 for that matter) can tell u exactly what Squizz just did......they r freakin unreal!!!!!

[2fardown]

Maybe because there are not as many around as the R33's. Are you looking at dealership prices? If so, then thats your answer.

[dAVE]

cos only a fool would buy a 32 over a 33.... hence, they assume they can rip fools off...

better not say that actually as i might get a 32 if I sell the surf.

[Nismo_Boy]

Originally posted by 2fardown

Maybe because there are not as many around as the R33's.  Are you looking at dealership prices? If so, then thats your answer.

no they were not dealership prices.

[002 NVS]

Why would you want an R33 when you can get a better car (R32) for less...

[dAVE]

Originally posted by 002 NVS

Why would you want an R33 when you can get a better car (R32) for less...

better.. will give u $10 if u can prove they are better.

[meggala]

thew r32's are a very sexy car and go jsut as hard as an r33.

they are also much more exclusive as we can only get one year of their prodiction from the 6 month 92 till 93. they tend to be in better nick . thery are oh so sexy compared to the r33.

who could not love this

meggala

[Nismo_Boy]

can any one say doooorift style

[2fardown]

I prefer the extra .5 litre, newer feel to my R33. If it had a bit more go in the engine departement I would have bought one. They look the goods thats for sure.

[[ABU53]]

dude...trust me (from experience) the extra 0.5 litre capacity makes stuff all difference...if any

[2fardown]

Humm 160kw or 187kw........187 for me thanks.

[rb26dett]

how about this for sexy??

[rb26dett]

dun forget the arse....

[NIZ30]

Issue is GTST's not GTR's. I think everyone agrees all GTR's kick ass!

Humm 160kw or 187kw........187 for me thanks.

yet they are still slower.

R33 GTST - Overweight, underpowered, low body rigidity & RB25 that breaks easier.

RB20's are strong, almost as powerful evidence is the JMS car, that thing took a pounding, put out very decent power figures and was internally stock and still going strong.

btw - have seen R33 Gtst nearly beaten (was extremely close) by NA Supra. Both cars were standard, with similar driving skills.

[2fardown]

Originally posted by NIZ30

Issue is GTST's not GTR's. I think everyone agrees all GTR's kick ass!

 

yet they are still slower.

R33 GTST - Overweight, underpowered, low body rigidity & RB25 that breaks easier.

RB20's are strong, almost as powerful evidence is the JMS car, that thing took a pounding, put out very decent power figures and was internally stock and still going strong.

btw - have seen R33 Gtst nearly beaten (was extremely close) by NA Supra. Both cars were standard, with similar driving skills.

I didn't want to go this far to prove that you are wrong but anyway. Visit this link http://homepages.ihug.co.nz/~arvidson/specs.htm check the specs, the figures speak for themselves. The R33 Gtst is faster on paper then the R32 Gtst. It's a known fact. And as for the comment about the RB25 breaking easier, well are you a mechanic?