Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys, my tuner disconnected the o2 sensor whilst tuning and forgot to connect it back after he was done with it.

I have since connected it back up and now the car idles funny when warm & backfires alot.

Would this have caused any issues because he tuned it when the o2 sensor was disconnected or would it be a totally unrelated problem ?

He also tuned it without a bov (blocked it off) but i got a GTR bov on there atm but i dont have the correct plumb back pipe so he blocked it, after i plumb it all up and get it running, would this affect the tune/cars drivebility & idle in anyway?

any help much appreciatyed.

Cheers

What ECU are you using?

you should be always tuning with the O2 switched off!

if its a powerFC, go into the settings menu, and disable it see how you go, if not enable it if it's disabled see how you go

i believe that the O2 sensor only trims the mixtures at cruise.

when tuning you turn the sensor off or you could unplug it. this allows the computer to not trim the mixtures and you get a true readout of what air fuel ratio you have.

but when youre under load the O2 sensor does nothing.

i am not running any at the moment in my GTR, still waiting on Nissan to get some in. the car runs fine, chews through a little more fuel than it should when cruising but other than that no difference.

its normal to turn off 02 feedback during tuning

but it should be re-enabled, the powerfc faq in my sig covers how to enable and check it

the blocked bov would make it stall and run like ass, fix that

im running a emanage ultimate.

oh ok fair enough, well its strange how the car idles funny when warm after connecting the 02 back up lol

ill get the bov sorted this weekend and see how it goes.

thanks guys :D

you cant turn feedback off with the ultimate so he may have tuned "around" it, leave it disconnected and run a tank through the car if your economy is fine leave it disconnected. I have on occasions had to do the same thing when a crook 02 sensor keeps 'pulling' the mixtures out of whack.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...