Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I don't clicked the s2000!

My front bumper doesn't have nothing...

greeces13.jpg

the s2k had already started to swerve to try to avoid you. At 5mins in that video you will see this image and the sound of you touching the s2k

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Well that would explain why the car was wobbling the rear end all over the place, Thats the reason why ANDRA specify a cross ply front trye must be used if on slicks going faster than i think 12 secs or is it 12.5?

Yes I am thinking the same thing.

Greece, if you have a Nismo 2 way diff then the accident could have been avoided with better brake control. I speculate that you left it too late to back off the throttle, panicked and then slamped on the brake when the rear end lost control. This just sent all of the weight to the front of an aldready heavy front ended set up and spun the car out of control. You should stiffen up the front suspension rather than put the stock front suspension back in.

Ok guys that is what I want.. to help me to optimise the car.. not to tell me that I am killer!!

zebra can you explain me better what are front cross ply tyres? I search it a little and I read that it is very important to run theese tires with slicks.. but I don't have slicks... I have Mickey Thompson ET Streets... They are like slicks.. they haven't metalic fibres for sidewall..

[WLDCRD]

If the S2000 continue the race she didn't have any problem.. I didn't touch her!

My front bumper hasn't any scratches! So how I touch her?

S2000 driver is a girl!!!! And we are in the same drag team :| :|

9krpm

Yes you are right!

If I leave it earlier it would be ok..

But I looose the car control because of the bumps of the street.

So you think that it is ok to have front stiff coilovers...

I also don't have front anti sway bar!! As I read at usa drag forums in every rwd they put off the antisway bar! Is it ok?

7.5 psi is very low?

The previous run was again with 7.5psi and was ok.. at the previous run I did the 11.2!

Maybe the tire pressure was less because I didn't check the tyre pressure before the run and it was night.. 7.5 was after hours that was the sun up! I protected both tires from the sun with boxes to don't have different pressures in the tires!

if some people read some things before posting they may be a little better informed

Mickey Thompson ET Street Radial Drag Tires yes Radial

http://www.jegs.com/p/Mickey-Thompson/Mick...753925/10002/-1

when i first watched the vids i though they were slicks without front runners and thought that was recipe for trouble but then read in the greeces13 sig and read he runs MT et's

i think parts of the Gibb River road in WA were flatter than that track

but at the end of the day thats racing you take it to the track where there is the support there is something go's wrong in this case it did

Edited by Walk510

ok then im quite sure you should be running front runners

as a friend ran these on his 32 with ran the front and said it scary at speed with those tyres

the radials are quite common on big hp street cars

[WLDCRD]

If the S2000 continue the race she didn't have any problem.. I didn't touch her!

My front bumper hasn't any scratches! So how I touch her?

S2000 driver is a girl!!!! And we are in the same drag team :| :|

are you saying that if she went straight ahead then she would have been fine and only you would have crashed?

i agree with whats been mentioned before there is a noise at around 5 minutes and you can also see the side skirt on the honda move when theres contact. yea maybe only minor contact, but when both your cars are allready off balance you dont ned much.

you car fish tales at least 4 times before you back off and hit the brakes. why is this?

Is it just me or does the track look like a lumpy Piece of crap ? From the first video it really looks like the track is some skanky Alleyway with all the lumps and bumps in it. Certainly not safe enough for a 10 sec car

zebra

As I understand my tires aren't radials... they are et street model... not et street radials!

And as I read is bias ply! Like cross ply..!

So i need front runners? But why? I see also

.. but I cannot understand why I cannot run with front radials..

The videο looks like with my video haha!

dangerman4

I don't know what exatly is this sound.. but you can definatly see that she turn it left before I came closer.

9krpm

I said that I don't have front sway bar!

I have only the rear sway bar.. the stock!

GTR-32U

Yeah!! It was like a motocross strip :):banana:

And in theese crazy scare strip try to run also some top fuel cars and motos.. see them following haha.

Some of them don't run after his first run!

48349636225351441008953.th.jpg48349597215351441008953.th.jpgmessini3rdrace20091114.th.jpgpolykastro2ndrace200920.th.jpg

Also read hear about my tires http://mickeythompsontires.com/strip.php?item=ETStreet

Theese tires needs tubes.. but the seller told me tha tubes needs very heavy vehicles and my vehicle don't need tubes!

Greeces13 - If I were you Id start to do a little more research before racing again, have a look for some US drag racing websites.

I thought you figured out why you cant run radials on the front and cross plys on the rear...due to the fact that you lost control of the car.....radials have WAY more cornering grip that cross plys, So instead of having even grip at the front an rear of the car, you have massive front end grip and next to zero at the back...this is half the reason you spun.

As for tubes in the tyres if they are reccomended by M/T then why the hell did the guy that sold them to you tell you, you dont need them???

Is it just me or is everybody else getting the feeling that there are ZERO saftey regs over there?

You know bumps and bounces don't mix too well with a drag setup car... that is soft suspension and low pressure tyres. pointless comparing them to a rally car that is designed for it.

end of the day what was the recommended tire pressure for them tires? not 7.5psi. That's where the major mistake was had. Anyone else try to keep control of there car at high speed with practically flat tires... i hope not. There is a difference between lowering pressure to allow some sidewall flex and ensuring a flat footprint and deflating them so they don't work at all.

The second major mistake and the potentially lethal mistake for you both is directly your fault. You almost killed someone as well as yourself never mind the damage to their car. When you started to wobble all over you should have backed off immediately.

The track did look craphouse i agree but what you did could have netted the same result on any strip.

At least you did it on a strip and not the street which is why your posting to us, not like plenty of others who can't who are frontpage news.

you car fish tales at least 4 times before you back off and hit the brakes. why is this?

I can tell you why. it's called a tank slapper and is caused by a number of things, the biggest of which is poor car control. basically over reacting and slow reacting. instead of making a small correction to both the throttle and the steering wheel you can see he jumps off the throttle which unsettles the car and then (too late) has a big tug of the wheel. hence the tank slapper which builds in momentum until he's into the wall.

I bet the S2000 driver wishes she was a few 1/10ths fast then she would have been out of his path of destruction... shame your accident also wrecked someone elses car whether you tagged it or not.

the reason you don't run radial tyres with ply tyres is not really to do with different levels of grip. it's because of the different construction of the tyres. bias ply or cross ply tyres have very soft sidewalls and very little lateral grip. running them with radial tyres on the front can cause problems with getting the car to run straight.

I would suggest going back to the ET street RADIALS. for some practice, then perhaps down the track go back to a bias ply or cross ply drag slick with the appropriate front runners to match. with more practice and some more experience your car control will improve and hopefully nothing like this will happen again.

I can tell you why. it's called a tank slapper and is caused by a number of things, the biggest of which is poor car control. basically over reacting and slow reacting. instead of making a small correction to both the throttle and the steering wheel you can see he jumps off the throttle which unsettles the car and then (too late) has a big tug of the wheel. hence the tank slapper which builds in momentum until he's into the wall.

I bet the S2000 driver wishes she was a few 1/10ths fast then she would have been out of his path of destruction... shame your accident also wrecked someone elses car whether you tagged it or not.

the reason you don't run radial tyres with ply tyres is not really to do with different levels of grip. it's because of the different construction of the tyres. bias ply or cross ply tyres have very soft sidewalls and very little lateral grip. running them with radial tyres on the front can cause problems with getting the car to run straight.

I would suggest going back to the ET street RADIALS. for some practice, then perhaps down the track go back to a bias ply or cross ply drag slick with the appropriate front runners to match. with more practice and some more experience your car control will improve and hopefully nothing like this will happen again.

ive had a few tank slappers on my bikes doin between 100-200km/h & it is frightening!

same as a skateboard when gets in a death wobbler...when this happens u hang on & hope for it to end.

I didn't touch her!

My front bumper hasn't any scratches! So how I touch her?

S2000 driver is a girl!!!! And we are in the same drag team :| :|

ella rrre - is your friend a good sort :D

zebra

As I understand my tires aren't radials... they are et street model... not et street radials!

And as I read is bias ply! Like cross ply..!

So i need front runners? But why? I see also

.. but I cannot understand why I cannot run with front radials..

The videο looks like with my video haha!

9krpm

I said that I don't have front sway bar!

I have only the rear sway bar.. the stock!

That video cracked me up but what you replied about the sway bar gives me the impression that you should certainly need to research more into car handling.

You don't wack a heavier engine into the front, remove the front sway bar and expect the car to be stable.

I read what you posted buddy. Without a sway bar at the front your car is even worst than having a stock or soft sway bar! I think you need to read a bit more into suspension tuning.

I wont' even ask what wheel alignment you had on the car.

Ok guys thanks for your good words for me.

Do you believe that I wanted to do it?

It was semifinal race of the championship at "Street RWD-4WD".

You will stop from the 1/8?

I continue the race as everyone would continue.

I was ok and I had the control of the car since I push the brakes. At the last cone was the end of the race... I hit the brakes 60 foots before the end because I was feel uncomfortable with my car.

But with the brakes the car starts to make drift.

In a good strip there is glue in all 1/4 mile.

In a good strip there is really good glue at the first foots so if I was in a good strip I didn't run with 7.5psi at my tires.

In a good strip there aren't bumps!!! If there aren'ts bumps my car wouldn't do like a ballerine!!

I understand that the strip is shit at my first run... and this run was the 6th!

That was my fault.... that I continue to do the "stunt man".

S2000 run 26x11.5x16 I run 26x11.5x15 .... Ofcourse S2000 is more stable!

S2000 had coilovers front and rear.

I had coilovers front and stock rear... maybe this was wrong too... maybe I must run with stocks front and rear!

so winning the race is more important than your life/ the other racers life and both of your cars?????

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, that's kinda the point. The calipers might interfere with the inside of the barrels 16" rims are only about 14" inside the barrels, which is ~350mm, and 334mm rotors only leave about 8mm outboard for the caliper before you get to 350, And.... that;s not gunna be enough. If the rims have a larger ID than that, you might sneak it in. I'd be putting a measuring stick inside the wheel and eyeballing the extra required for the caliper outboard of the rotor before committing to bolting it all on.
    • OK, so again it has been a bit of a break but it was around researching what had been done since I didn't have access to Neil's records and not everything is obvious without pulling stuff apart. Happily the guy who assembled the engine had kept reasonable records, so we now know the final spec is: Bottom end: Standard block and crank Ross 86.5mm forgies, 9:1 compression Spool forged rods Standard main bolts Oil pump Spool billet gears in standard housing Aeroflow extended and baffled sump Head Freshly rebuilt standard head with new 80lb valve springs Mild porting/port match Head oil feed restrictor VCT disabled Tighe 805C reground cams (255 duration, 8.93 lift)  Adjustable cam gears on inlet/exhaust Standard head bolts, gasket not confirmed but assumed MLS External 555cc Nismo injectors Z32 AFM Bosch 023 Intank fuel pump Garret 2871 (factory housings and manifold) Hypertune FFP plenum with standard throttle   Time to book in a trip to Unigroup
    • I forgot about my shiny new plates!
    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
×
×
  • Create New...