Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all,

My upper control arm bushes are stuffed, caused me to wear out an expensive set of tyres in about 6-7 thousand K's (really bad camber wear on the outside, the inside of the tyre look pretty new). the local import garage quoted me 1400 to re-bush and told me my stub axle had a stuffed uni-joint... I was bullshitted yeah?

so I've decided to do the work myself, the current upper control arm itself should be fine, but I just want to double check my plans with some more experienced folk to make sure I'm not wasteing my cash on unneeded or incorrect parts.

I'm planning on rebushing the upper control arm with this set from uniqueautoparts.com; Clicky bush's inplace image

I've also noticed that my castor rod inner bush has gone soft from contact with engine oil, have been looking around and have seen images that look like what I'm after but the part is a called a "radius rod" bush is this the same as the castor rod bush?

cheers

Dan

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/280755-re-bushing-r32-front-end/
Share on other sites

yep that is the whiteline upper control arm kit. only the outer end is adjustable so if you need to adjust camber more than 1o you will need to buy 2 camber kits.

and yes radius rod = castor rod. you should buy adjustable bush for that as well.

the upper arm bushes are a bit of a pain to remove, you may not want to try it yourself unless you are sure you know what you are doing

The bushes require press fitting into the upper arms. I forgot exactly what rating the press needs to be (10T??) but best to ask Sydneykid about that as he is the guru as far as Suspension, and whiteline kits.

Cheers

David

Edited by R32Abuser
The bushes require press fitting into the upper arms. I forgot exactly what rating the press needs to be (10T??) but best to ask Sydneykid about that as he is the guru as far as Suspension, and whiteline kits.

Cheers

David

The old Nissan ones need pressing to get out. The new (whiteline) ones if that is what you are using don't need a press.

Some guys find that even two sets of adjustable bushes in the upper arm arent enough (depends on height and how much camber you want), so they've used replacement arms.

re; stub axle, IIRC there's a ball joint at the bottom and a kingpin in the middle. If the kingpin's loose you might be able to get away with just tightening it up again.

Lower control arm inner bushes are also a good idea on R32GTST's, I very rarely see one these days that doesn't need them badly.

Cheers

Gary

Photo/part number? and do you still reccomend the adjustable upper bushes or an arm these days?

Photo/part number? and do you still reccomend the adjustable upper bushes or an arm these days?

I have been using bushes again for some time, the original Whiteline Flat Out or the Whilteine Plus (nee Noltec). As far as I am aware no one is making the original Noltec replacement, bushed upper arm. I would never use spherical bearings anywhere in a road car, so that rules out all of the other aftermarket designs. The spherical bearing fauilure rate in R32's is huge due to the convoluted angles the upper control arm moves through.

Cheers

Gary

I have been using bushes again for some time, the original Whiteline Flat Out or the Whilteine Plus (nee Noltec). As far as I am aware no one is making the original Noltec replacement, bushed upper arm. I would never use spherical bearings anywhere in a road car, so that rules out all of the other aftermarket designs. The spherical bearing fauilure rate in R32's is huge due to the convoluted angles the upper control arm moves through.

Cheers

Gary

Is there any difference between the two products? flatout/PLUS

http://www.whiteline.com.au/product_detail...t_number=KCA336

http://www.whiteline.com.au/Plus/pdf/WHITE...L_CATALOGUE.pdf

My whiteline stuff has been fine in the stagea, needs relubing now though!

Is there any difference between the two products? flatout/PLUS

http://www.whiteline.com.au/product_detail...t_number=KCA336

http://www.whiteline.com.au/Plus/pdf/WHITE...L_CATALOGUE.pdf

My whiteline stuff has been fine in the stagea, needs relubing now though!

Whiteline Flat Out = the original Whiteline range, some of which I have designed over the years

Whiteline Plus = Noltec designs.

There are some part numbers which are better in Whiteline Flat Out and some in Whiteline Plus. I tend to use the Whiteline Plus part numbers when I need on car adjustment (eg; front caster and rear camber), they cost a bit more but it pays for itself in the ease of adjustment (ie; lower wheel lalignment costs). Plus there is no front camber kit for R32's in the Whiteline Plus range.

I do also use some Nolathane part numbers and very rarely Superpro.

All polyurethane bushes need servicing, bit of grease once or twice a year.

Cheers

Gary

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi there... Now I'm only new when it comes to fiddling with suspension, and have also been informed that replacing the lower inner control arm bushes is a good idea on my 1990 R32 GT-R. Call me stoopid, but I'm just not 100% sure which ones would be the best for my street driven application? Cost is also a factor for me, so I'll be doing the job myself if at all possible - do I need a press for this to either remove or install the bushes?

Cheers, Quentin

Presses are cheap these days thanks to China. Get yourself one and you will be amazed at what a difference new suspension bushes make to your car. I will never forget the first time I replaced the rears with the Whiteline adjusting bushes and the front castor and camber bushes with same, sooooo much tighter and steered so much better. Then after the pineapple bushes in the squat position another level was reached. My goal now is to do all the bushes in urethane or Nismo rubber.

I've never had a problem using a 10 tonne home garage style.

Cheers

Gary

Thanks Gary, think I'll be investing in one then. I intend on doing more of this in the future, so it can't hurt. Can you recommend a brand/type of lower control bushes for an R32 GT-R? I've had a look around but just can't find the reliable info I'm after.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...