Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

maybe you should look up the RH9 club kid. or the vielside GTR.

supras rwd gtr is 4wd thats a big friggen advantage if you running street legal tyres.

best advice avoid lame arguments on which is better and remember only pussies use nitro methane

Edited by Inline 6

i ran 11.1 @ 131mph. car was epa legal & fully engineered. I am not aware of any cars that were fast and road legal at the same time.

I guess the new 35 gtrs are legal and fast.

I have the fastest R33 in my street, and probably a few surrounnding suburbs, also this reminds me, does anyone know what happend to the guy with the AWD Magna from West pennant hills who was bloody quick???? Havent seen him in ages

Fastest Skyline GTR in my country. (Dominican Republic) :P I think there are less than 15 GTR's...

10.39@129mph, NO Nitrous, Drag Radial Tires, Full trim .... looking to enter on the 9 sec club this year !

What is the fastest Skyline GTR Full trim worldwide ?

I have the fastest R33 in my street, and probably a few surrounnding suburbs, also this reminds me, does anyone know what happend to the guy with the AWD Magna from West pennant hills who was bloody quick???? Havent seen him in ages

That would be Jason.. And that magna was supercharged.. His SAU username is ONN20S. Not sure if anything happened to him, I still see him around from time to time.

  • 2 years later...

I bought my power FC from a dude not far from me, who is on this forum, who said he has actually the worlds fastest street legal R32 GTR.

His engine bay, I took this pic when I picked up the ECU. I got excited.

post-68383-0-76368700-1328438726_thumb.jpg

Edited by SargeRX8

I bought my power FC from a dude not far from me, who is on this forum, who said he has actually the worlds fastest street legal R32 GTR.

His engine bay, I took this pic when I picked up the ECU. I got excited.

For some reason i thought "JUN" was the fastest R32 GTR?? ran a low 9 didn't it?

Paul(superjet760) - RH9GTR (picture above) has run a 8.9

Thats the guy. It took a while for him to convince me he was lebanese haha. That car was sexy in the flesh.

I see all these guys running these huge bell mouths and no filters on their turbos. Aren't you worried about sucking in some dirt or small birds?

Edited by SargeRX8

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Get an inspection camera up there. 
    • Yeah, but look at the margin in viscosity between the 40 and the 60 at 125°C. It is not very large. It is the difference between 7 and 11 cP. Compare that to the viscosity at only 90°C. The viscosity axis is logarithmic. The numbers at 90 are ~15 and ~35. That is about half for the 40 wt oil and <half for the 60. You give up viscosity EXPONENTIALLY as temperature rises. Literally. That is why I declare thicker oil to be a bandaid, and a brittle one at that. Keep the oil temperature under about 110°C and you should be better off.   Having said all of that, which remains true as a general principle, if you have indeed lost enough oil from the sump that the pump was seeing slightly aerated oil, then all bets are off. That would of course cause oil pressure to collapse. And 35 psi is a collapse given what you were doing to the engine. Especially if the oil was that hot and viscosity had also collapsed. And I would put money on rod or main bearings being the source of the any noise that registered as knock. Hydraulic lifters should be able to cope with the hotter oil and lower pressure enough to prvent too much high frequency noise, although I am willing to admit it could be the source.
    • Thanks for the reply mate. Well I really hope its a hose then not engine out job
    • But.... the reason I want to run a 60 weight is so at 125C it has the same viscosity as a 40 weight at 100C. That's the whole reason. If the viscosity changes that much to drop oil pressure from 73psi to 36psi then that's another reason I should be running an oil that mimics the 40 weight at 100C. I have datalogs from the dyno with the oil pressure hitting 73psi at full throttle/high RPM. At the dyno the oil temp was around 100-105C. The pump has a 70psi internal relief spring. It will never go/can't go above 70psi. The GM recommendation of 6psi per 1000rpm is well under that... The oil sensor for logging in LS's is at the valley plate at the back of  the block/rear of where the heads are near the firewall. It's also where the knock sensors are which are notable for 'false knock'. I'm hoping I just didn't have enough oil up top causing some chatter instead of rods being sad (big hopium/copium I know) LS's definitely heat up the oil more than RB's do, the stock vettes for example will hit 300F(150C) in a lap or two and happily track for years and years. This is the same oil cooler that I had when I was in RB land, being the Setrab 25 row oil cooler HEL thing. I did think about putting a fan in there to pull air out more, though I don't know if that will actually help in huge load situations with lots of speed. I think when I had the auto cooler. The leak is where the block runs to the oil cooler lines, the OEM/Dash oil pressure sender is connected at that junction and is what broke. I'm actually quite curious to see how much oil in total capacity is actually left in the engine. As it currently stands I'm waiting on that bush to adapt the sender to it. The sump is still full (?) of oil and the lines and accusump have been drained, but the filter and block are off. I suspect there's maybe less than 1/2 the total capacity there should be in there. I have noticed in the past that topping up oil has improved oil pressure, as reported by the dash sensor. This is all extremely sketchy hence wanting to get it sorted out lol.
×
×
  • Create New...