Jump to content
SAU Community

Anyone done a mid to low 9 second 1/4 with totally stock internals, can it be done??


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Well according to his signature, he's getting 10.4s quarters on stock internals. How I dunno :( But I would imagine that he's dicing with death even at that. Unless you put the engine on a motorcycle or something I would say that 9s quarters are impossible on stock internals, even for an RB26.

Well hicks, have done a 10.5 @ 127mph with 100% stock bits and we detuned it to get traction to do that. Just wondering if anyone else was doing simila thats all. Should pull a 9 when run on a prepped track and with the car stripped. When we did the 10.5 it still had carpets, standard seats, A/C, stereo etc.

Why does everyone seem to be scared to wind up stock parts???

I get the feeling he is out to make a point that it can be done...good luck.

Rb26 head with RB30 bottom end i assume. I can see you possibly cracking a 9.99, but it would take some doing to get well into the 9s.

What bottom end are you using?

with that head?

And to crack a 10, you need an average of 300rwkw across your use-able rev range (what-ever that be)

So that means peak will be over 300rwkw, no way stock internals and pump fuel.

And that's in a 4wd car yes? Slicks or not?

give some reasonable detail about ALL other mods too

R31Nismoid, Totally stock RB30e bottom end (300,000km motor with rings and bearings only), totally stock RB25de head, stock cams, stock cam gears, stock valve springs, stock head gasket, NO porting, stock RB20det exhaust manifold, stock gearbox and driveshafts, stock diffs, pump gas, DOT tyres.

And you need more than an average of 300rwkw to crack at 10 in a 1450kg GTS4 I think.

stock RB30 bottom end?

I dont know one car that has run a 10 with a stock RB30 bottom end. ALL have had pistons etc.

People have tried and it just doesnt happen.

You wont need more than 300rwkw AVERAGE in a rwd skyline on slicks. That's over a 3500-4000 odd RPM range.

And stock diff's/g'box ?

You don't need forged pistons or rods. The car we're talking about runs a stock gearbox etc and weighs more than a rwd GTSt and we don't use slicks . I think our new car thats lighter should run low 9's with stock internals on street tyres, is that sooooooooo hard to believe?? What do you think might fail?

When you do, post a vid RIPS with a 9sec pass with what you have.. oz will be impressed..

the quickest GTR's here that are doing 10's have had a LOT of money thrown at them..

Why do you need to spend alot of money to do a 10?

The long motor used costs around $4500 all up outright and thats a 4wd engine which costs more than a 2wd.

What have these guys with GTR's doing 10's find they are breaking?

Well dont RIPS, and keep it up. Get that 9!

IMHO, the two main things that cause problems is detonation and revs.

Keep detonation under control with a good tune and adequate fuel, keep the revs close to manufacturers specs and all is good:)

Just my 0.02c

Out of interest exactly what type of piston are you using & what (if anything) has been done to them to cope with the power level you have to run 10's?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...