Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

my gearbox is out of my r32 gtst because i have just relpaced the clutch

i have the car up on stands in my driveway and dont have a trans jack, me and my mate can manage to lift it up enough however when we try to lift it up it seams the trans tunnel is to small to alow you to riase thye box far enough back from the clutch pressure plate to clear it.

for those that have done this before could u give me any tips??

cheers

-Alex

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/296208-puttin-gearbox-back-in-32-gtst/
Share on other sites

Too much information, mongor!!!!

You shouldn't need to force the engine backwards. If you disconnect everything correctly, the engine should just roll back and rest the back of the rocker covers against the firewall.

i agree with the slight jack up of the front of the engine works wonders.

but at the same time it can be done without doing anything, but it took me 2 hours just to get the box back in the first time and it was the last time i changed a gear box on the floor.

I used a trolley jack hold the majority of the weight of the gear box while my mate I got it at the correct angle for it to slide in.

It's even worse with a 25 box..

As mentioned above, gotta put it in rotated.

With the 25 box I have to go as far as dropping the engine crossmember about an inch (as far down as it will go wit the nuts still having purchase) but this is also due to the bigass fitting at the back of head.

alright thanks guys, well the gearbox crossmemeber is stil attatched to the box so i guess if im going to rotate it i will have to take it off, or i might drop the crossmember, if its not to hard.

:)

I vote for jacking up sump or even the front pulleys, but use wood so you dont damage anything.

once you have the box on and you cant get it close enough at the top to get those stupid top bolts in you can place some wood or a stand under the front of the engine and jack up the back of the gearbox so they oppose each other and then you can chuck the bottom bolts in and the the top will close up by itself under the strain :)

This saved me a lot of time when putting in the gearbox by myself (no friends)

Edited by Jap4life

sounds like a good tip,

i scored a trans jack from work, woop woop, just wish this rain would stop, workin in a river aint fun.

when it stops ima try puttin the box in upside down n then rotating it onces its on,

if that doesnt work then ill try jacking the front of the sump and or loosening the crossmember abit,

no doubt that wouldnt be fun without a rattle gun tho

ok guys its all in and the cars back ;)

thanks for the help everyone, in the end i had to do everything, drop crossmember, loosen engine mounts, jack up front of sump, and then put the trans in upside down then onces the front of the input shaft was just inside the clutch plate i was able to rotate it so that the bellhousing was lined up n then a bit of wiggling and the box went in :D

cheers everyone

and those top bolts were a piece of piss with the crossmember dropped and stuff, should have done it all like that in the first place, only bolt i struggled with was the top starter motor bolt, just took ages, 1 click of a ratchet at a time lol

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...