Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Dear members,

I have an rb20det engine problem...

The bearings in the block are apparently gone... but i dont know if i should get a new engine or just replace the block which is cheapest or if it'll run fine if i just change the block maybe there's more problems... but i was also thinking to just get an rb25det??

could somoone help out? how much is the cost for an rb25det and how much could i get a rb20det block for an r32 gts4 which is cheapest...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/296913-engine-block-problem/
Share on other sites

+1 for the 25. much nicer engine. more power up top and much more power down low. however i would go all out and get a halfcut so you can get the stronger gearbox as well (just noticed you mention a gts-4, so i'm not sure how compatiable the rb25 box is to the rb20, or if there is even any difference with the gts-4 boxes between the 20 and 25).

Since you mention GTS4, unfortunately you can't just drop anyold RB20 or RB25 in, as the 4WD sump is different from the RWD. You would either need a RB20DET from another GTS4, or a RB25DET from a 4WD Stagea, or else you will have to get adapter plates etc... that's how I understand it anyway.

Thanks for the help guys, appreciate it...

Still deciding and save up money...

my mates friends owns a r32 just recently fitted an rb25det and still using the standard rb20det gtst gearbox and standard loom!!

i think the nistune would be useful to install??

Always wondered if you could get a modern GTS4 in 2.5t using a combo of parts fromt the stagea etc, probably not worth doing over an RB26 conversion though, although you would get VCT and Neo motor!!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...