Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I drive a built 32 gtr with a T04z on the circuit and i dont think the car will be any fun at all with a 7k redline. Honestly your power ban and redline will come together like cousins at a tasmanian family reunion!

You need to be able to rev it til at least 8000-8500 to really make it somewhat responsive!

HAHAHA Yeh well true. Is your 32 gtr a 26 or 26/30? What is your redline? What rear housing do you have on the turbo?

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

HAHAHA Yeh well true. Is your 32 gtr a 26 or 26/30? What is your redline? What rear housing do you have on the turbo?

Its just a forged 26, The 32 is my best mates and was only recently acquired from another

friend who invested the big dollars into the car. I shift at about 8k on the circuit [which is hard in the lower gears], im not sure what the redline cutout is. I have seen the car spin nearly 9k without the revlimiter cut-out so i imagine it is @9k. from memory the rear housing is .84. not 100% though

will find out.

It might be a completely different application to yours, but i think that 7k will still prove to be too low in the lower gears.

These are just my thoughts for what they're worth .

A good friend used to tell me that a given result was "adequate" , and there doesn't necessarily have to be a number on it .

At a guess a street driven Skyline doesn't need 420 Kw to feel good and be more than adequate .

Trying to be realistic I think something in the 260-300 RwKw area is good performance provided it pulls reasonably and has a wide useful rev range .

I think aiming for a number like 420 Kw means the state of tune would have to be high even with three liters and maybe not so nice when driven like a std street car around the burbs .

Twin scroll single turbos can be great things but the munjaras to get everything working just so is a big stack of notes . Most people want an Rb30 bottom end to have more torque off boost and to spin bigish dryers up reasonably easily .

I would not be a great fan of GT3582R's but they have their place and some like them on RB30 twin cam engines . There obviously comes a time when the std manifold becomes a limitation and if it didn't the "t3" sized flange would .

Really the T04Z's need a turbine housing with the larger T4 International sized mounting flange because they have larger inlet passages as would an exhaust manifold with that sized flange . HKS uses the T4 sized flange and arguably their housings work better than Garretts Diesel spec ones on that cartridge - for a petrol application .

For me I'd use a GT3076R with the largest 1.06 A/R wastegated turbine housing on a steet car , wouldn't get 460 Kw but with a bit of engine work and the right CR I think 320 is achievable . Most won't go with that 1.06 housing because they think it makes GT3582R's feel laggy , why I don't know because it wouldn't have the GT35 turbine or GT40 compressor and as a plus a GT30 turbine housing is a match for a GT30 turbine . Different story with a GT35 turbine in a bored out GT30 turbine housing - maps show why .

Big turbine housings usually don't have creep issues because the gas speed is lower so more likely to take the exit stage left turn out throught the gate when it opens .

Just my two street cents spent , cheers A .

Its just a forged 26, The 32 is my best mates and was only recently acquired from another

friend who invested the big dollars into the car. I shift at about 8k on the circuit [which is hard in the lower gears], im not sure what the redline cutout is. I have seen the car spin nearly 9k without the revlimiter cut-out so i imagine it is @9k. from memory the rear housing is .84. not 100% though

will find out.

It might be a completely different application to yours, but i think that 7k will still prove to be too low in the lower gears.

AH ok yeh 26 are fine for rev's compared to the 30. Yeh if you could please find out that would be lovely.

Disco - I had a 3076r 0.82 for the car when it was to be a 25 but changed up to the 3582r 0.82 when i decided it would be a 25/30. Thought the 3076r would be a little too small and too lightswitch for the 30. I was told the 3582 on a 30 would be like a 3076 on a 25. Hoping so anyways. How would you rate the difference in spool time, etc etc (mainly everything you personally can think of) between the T3 1.06 gt35r and the T4 0.84 TS t04z

Well the whole idea of the 1.06 A/R turbine housing is to raise the boost threshold so it wouldn't be "too snappy" .

One of the things that makes Garrett's GT30 and GT35 turbines laggy in some peoples opinions is the big trim size - 84T . The point I'm making is that going big in A/R with a big trim turbine makes a big difference in gas speed through the housing . Usually when this topic is discussed I suggest people look at the turbine map for the GT30 turbine . The difference in the gas flow lines on Garretts graph is vast , greater than the difference between their 0.63 and 0.82 A/R GT30 housings . I also suggest they look at the GT3582R's turbine map and note the gentle curve towards the right for all three A/R housings with that GT35 turbine .

The only T series turbo , T04Z is a BB T series unit , I knew about on a SOHC RB30ET was a bush bearing T04S which had a 1.00 A/R turbine housaing and P trim T04 turbine . From memory the compressor was a T04 60-1 in a 0.70 A/R comp housing and the report was that it tore up the tarmack on 10 lbs of boost .

IMO is is an urban myth that mid sized twin scroll turbine housings improve "spool" . Twin scroll systems are not about gas speed they are about reducing manifold pressure and taking advantage of the pulse energy available .

A .

Well the whole idea of the 1.06 A/R turbine housing is to raise the boost threshold so it wouldn't be "too snappy" .

One of the things that makes Garrett's GT30 and GT35 turbines laggy in some peoples opinions is the big trim size - 84T . The point I'm making is that going big in A/R with a big trim turbine makes a big difference in gas speed through the housing . Usually when this topic is discussed I suggest people look at the turbine map for the GT30 turbine . The difference in the gas flow lines on Garretts graph is vast , greater than the difference between their 0.63 and 0.82 A/R GT30 housings . I also suggest they look at the GT3582R's turbine map and note the gentle curve towards the right for all three A/R housings with that GT35 turbine .

The only T series turbo , T04Z is a BB T series unit , I knew about on a SOHC RB30ET was a bush bearing T04S which had a 1.00 A/R turbine housaing and P trim T04 turbine . From memory the compressor was a T04 60-1 in a 0.70 A/R comp housing and the report was that it tore up the tarmack on 10 lbs of boost .

IMO is is an urban myth that mid sized twin scroll turbine housings improve "spool" . Twin scroll systems are not about gas speed they are about reducing manifold pressure and taking advantage of the pulse energy available .

A .

Yeh well that makes me think a little differently now I guess. If there is minimal difference noticeable in twin scroll then meh. From what I was reading is it was wonderful :3some: Im still yet to see what my 3582 with 0.82 rear maxes out on. Cheers for the wise words :/

You're right I should pull out the motor and rebuild it all again? Is it so bad that I don't want to rev the f**k out of the motor? It is all balanced etc I just don't really want to rev the f**k out of it. Ive never even seen the rev limit in my car EVER. I will see how the car goes rev wise with this tune. Maybe I will put the limit at 7500. I was just thinking 7000 as I don't want to have to wait so god damn long if I had to rebuild again. I just kind of wanted this motor to last longer than 4 weeks. A build takes quite a while being a pov ass uni student. Is the extra 500rpm that big of a difference? It only a street car. It has never seen a race track or a drag strip ever.

Haha, don't get me wrong, i only own a Suzuki serrai, I don't think i've even ever touched a skyline. However, logically, you can pretty easily determine that if your engine goes, its either going to be because of some catastrophic failure (eg, oil pump), or from general wear. Ask the guy who built the engine how high it should be reved, get a good oil pump if your worried about that shitting itself, and set your rev limit accordingly. Remember, redline at 7000 or 8000rpm isn't going to be a huge difference in wear, especially if its not a full time track care and will be seeing a lot of time putting around the suburbs at 3000rpm anyway.

Haha, don't get me wrong, i only own a Suzuki serrai, I don't think i've even ever touched a skyline. However, logically, you can pretty easily determine that if your engine goes, its either going to be because of some catastrophic failure (eg, oil pump), or from general wear. Ask the guy who built the engine how high it should be reved, get a good oil pump if your worried about that shitting itself, and set your rev limit accordingly. Remember, redline at 7000 or 8000rpm isn't going to be a huge difference in wear, especially if its not a full time track care and will be seeing a lot of time putting around the suburbs at 3000rpm anyway.

Yeh I think Im not going to touch the 8000rpm limit. putting around the burbs haha just sounds so silly. Yeh well I dont want to risk oil pump failure. Maybe if the engine does a naughty broken thing I will just put in the better oil pump that time. Yeh like JonnoHR31 said I thought there was a fairly big difference between stress from 7000 to 8000.

I just never thought it was common practise to take the twin cam 30 to 8k. I will definately update this thread depending on what tuner says etc etc and how my 35r 0.82 goes on the 25/30 :cheers: Which reminds me it is once again time to phone the mechanics to see what they have to say with progress etc

Edited by Lukas 33
AH ok yeh 26 are fine for rev's compared to the 30. Yeh if you could please find out that would be lovely.

the RB30 engine has no issues with revs

my 30 is currently limited to 7500rpm as i only have the stock ballancer

AL's 30 is limited to 8000rpm with an aftermarket ballancer

both engines are forged and all the internals well balanced.

or there is the rips engine massive power and stock internals (with some prep work) and occasionally hits 10000rpm

the RB30 engine has no issues with revs

my 30 is currently limited to 7500rpm as i only have the stock ballancer

AL's 30 is limited to 8000rpm with an aftermarket ballancer

both engines are forged and all the internals well balanced.

or there is the rips engine massive power and stock internals (with some prep work) and occasionally hits 10000rpm

Yeh my internals are balanced but only has a stock balancer. You have to admit rob is an exception when it comes to rb30. Just because he can rev to 10000rpm and hit 1000hp doesn't mean I have a chance in hell haha

Good balancing and a good balancer, there is no reason why you can't spin the 30 to 9k.

My mates 30 has the rev limit at 8k and I'll probably set mine the same unless power drops off earlier.

Good balancing and a good balancer, there is no reason why you can't spin the 30 to 9k.

My mates 30 has the rev limit at 8k and I'll probably set mine the same unless power drops off earlier.

Even without a good oil pump?

For information sake, my seat of the pants o meter seems to think there isnt really a huge deal between the .82 and 1.06 housing lag wise on a rb30/25.

I changed from the .82 to the 1.06 housing and while boost didnt spool as early, it was annoying undrivable. I actually prefer the fact it kicks in a bit more.

I would love to give you some comparible dyno numbers but unfortunately my engine lost all oil pressure while i was getting the 1.06 turbo tuned. When its fixed, ill post up some comparisons

Edited by SirRacer

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My experience with Rising Sun Exports Before agreeing to the sale I tried to do as much research as I could (obviously), his Facebook reviews are 98% and he goes Live at least once or twice a week. I contacted 2 people in the UK who had used him for their imports, both had positive feedback. His explanation and talk through of the import process was thorough, answering any query no matter how stupid it was. It felt as soon as the money was sent, communication dropped off. I asked for shipping updates every 2 weeks or so, not wanting to pester him, he never had any updates. I wasn't informed the car had been dropped off at the port, I only found out by his Facebook story. I asked for the photos taken at the port, knowing he would need some for insurance purposes. I received a few 5 second clips and that's it. When asked again, he said his staff had them. Weeks later I asked again, he tells me he doesn't have any, but does have 50 photos from the original advert. I never received them. I eventually got the documents sent via WhatsApp after I mentioned the port was requesting them. I purchased a CarVX report, to find out the vehicle is a Grade R with recorded accident damage, first recorded in 2017 when it was first auctioned. He never told me the grade, then again I didn't ask. His response was "Grade R means nothing, it wasn't chassis damage". Still, I would have liked to have been informed about it. Jon prides himself on being open and honest when it comes to inspecting cars, it's his main job doing so at the auctions for customers. When the vehicle arrived in the UK I noticed a few little cosmetic issues. It's a 21 year old car so it wasn't going to be mint condition. The side skirts are cracked on each corner and the sealant is failing. The front grill on the bonnet/hood isn't secured very well, mounting studs are missing. Both minor things, but again, it would have been nice to be told. During a Facebook Live walk around video of the vehicle, he mentioned it has a front Whiteline anti roll bar/sway bar. While on the inspection ramp, I noticed the stock item has been installed. When first questioned, his response was "the ARB? Switched? Since when, it never had them". Since sending video and photo evidence I've not received a response. I'm probably being over critical of the overall condition of an old car, but all I wanted was honesty (which he claims to have). I'm aware I wasn't his only customer, he's busy doing XYZ but other reviews praise him for great communication with regular updates and photos, I felt I didn't receive the same treatment. 
    • I was able to get some underside photos while the car was on the ramp The suspension is all Altezza/IS200/IS300 so getting part's will hopefully be less of a headache
    • Welcome to my 2004 Toyota Mark ii IR-V Fortuna (series 2) With a 1JZ-GTE powerplant under the bonnet (hood) it'll give me plenty of scope for power upgrades. For those who aren't familiar with imports, the 1JZ-GTE is a 2.5L 6 cylinder VVTi engine with a single turbocharger. This has the factory R154 5 speed gearbox, along with a aftermarket 2 way LSD differential (brand unknown). Under the arches are a set of CST Zero 1 alloys, 18x9 +30 225/40 up front and 18x9.5 +15 265/35 on the rear. The car was quite low in Japan and there's evidence of the wheels catching the rolled arches/fenders. The tyre's aren't great so I'm in two minds whether to replace both or just the tyres and put up with the wider wheels on the rear. The car still uses stock brakes with the addition of some braided hoses. The exterior is stock with the exception of a BN Sports front bumper and a replacement Fortuna grill  Moving to the interior, the steering wheel has been replaced with a dished MOMO steering wheel (which will get swapped for my Momo Tuner for the time being) Defi Link Gauges are mounted above the climate controls and on the A pillar, the Oil Temp,Oil Pressure,Water Temp and Boost gauges should help with spirited and track driving  The stock seats have been replaced with some retrimmed Recaro bucket seats. Being a larger build these are a little snug, unfortunately the orange isn't for me so I'll look into replacing these down the line. Other modifications include a twin plate clutch, Blitz intercooler, Evolve alloy radiator, a stainless exhaust with decat, HKS EVC-S boost controller and coil overs
    • Apologies for the long read My R34 GTT was up for sale at the beginning of spring due to a few repairs creeping up. The strut tops needed replacing, roof and bonnet (hood) painting (yay for 3 stage pearl) and the underside stripped and treated. I sold the car which allowed me to be in a much better place financially. Leading up to the sale I was already thinking about the replacement. In an ideal world it needed to be a good all-rounder. Something I can mess around with, modify, do track days, do the school run, go on long drives etc.  Options included but not limited to... Laurel C35, Evo 8/9, Civic FD2, Impreza Hawkeye, Aristo and even an Audi S4 Avant (I've already got the Mazda 6 wagon). But there was always one car at the top of the list The Toyota Mark ii JZX110 I found an advert on a Facebook group for an example in Japan, from a seller called Jon at Rising Sun Exports. A few messages back and forth and Jon calls me from Yokohama one morning (or afternoon in his case). He briefly explained the import process, the costs involved and a repeat of the advert. After much deliberation, the price was agreed and the sale was locked in. I've never imported a vehicle so I jumped into the unknown head first. The money transfer was completed through wise.com (fees apply), very easy to use and the money was with him within a day or two.  The car suspension was raised for the vessel and the car dropped off at the port. It was 7 weeks later when the bill of lading was received and the freight invoice sent to me, followed by the export certificate a couple of days after (both digital copies) In the mean time the port had been in contact. I needed an agent to deal with the NOVA (notification of vehicle arrival) along with the tax/duty invoice, this was £75.00. The port also had a fee of £100, I'm guessing to cover the cost of the 10 day 'free storage' and for moving the car off the boat etc. They need a copy of the vehicle invoice, freight invoice and export certificate to allow the vehicle to pass through customs. The vessel arrived on Tuesday 5th August, the tax/duty invoice was generated and sent over. This is generally tax 20% and duty 10% of the vehicle value. Although the invoice came in at a higher amount than I had calculated. Once HMRC had received the payment the vehicle could be released from customs. I thought once the tax/duty was paid you could collect at any point, that's not the case. Your agent will need to book a collection slot, I requested Thursday 7th which was accepted, with a 9:00am slot allocated. It was a 5:00am start from Norfolk heading to Southampton. We eventually found the compound, upon presenting the bill of lading and some ID they released the car (they drove it out of the compound to the front ready for us to load up). The email from the port stated each slot had a 10 minute window, which seemed abit farfetched but the staff said it's not a strict rule. We were there for approx. 30-40 mins in total. A week prior to collecting I contacted my garage and explained the situation, I was able to get an inspection slot that afternoon. For the registration, DVLA require the car to be insured, for this I used a company called Adrian Flux who can insure the vehicle using the VIN number. 
    • Hey guys, looking for these side skirts if anyone can help me out. 
×
×
  • Create New...