Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

What a shit race, shame the FIA for taking away re-fuelling. Cars that are 2-4 seconds per lap quicker and stuck back in the lower positions :thumbsup: This year is going to be shit compared to some of the blinders we had in years past

agree 100% mate. very neatly put.

  • Replies 3.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Has me wondering if its worthwhile jumping accross the drink and going to Malaysian and Chinese GPs ????!?!?!?!? Will have to see what happens with Albert Park i guess. Though Malaysian GP is usually pretty good as there are some good spots for overtaking and weather is a good variable. Plus the weekend on the drink in Malaysia is normally good fun

yeah before the race I was near 100% for a quick trip down to melbourne for next weekends GP, but after watching the race I think I'll stay home and watch it on TV. I was planning to do singapore later in the year too as justin is there now, but not so sure any more. :thumbsup:

yep, last season was pretty good. lots of different winners. championship down to the second last race. webber won a couple and a few podiums. plenty of crazy moves to keep things interesting too.

things are looking pretty dull this year with no real hope in sight.

Well what a boring race....If its going to be like that for the rest of the year i won't be watching....

I still rekon they're going about the whole passing thing the wrong way...Give the cars back the mechanical grip with tyres and underbody aero aids (think indycars of the 90's) and reduce those wing sizes even more to try and reduce some disturbance of the air behind the cars

Man, there is no need for another review of the regulations. How cheap would it be to simply re-introduce re-fuelling and rather then Kers which only a few cars have, give them an extra 3,000rpm to use for 12-16 seconds per race in intervals of no more then 3 seconds per lap. The extra revs bag them a bit more power and top speed down the straights so that when they are 2 seconds quicker then the car they are following there is at least the opportunity to pass and clear on out

I still rekon they're going about the whole passing thing the wrong way...Give the cars back the mechanical grip with tyres and underbody aero aids (think indycars of the 90's) and reduce those wing sizes even more to try and reduce some disturbance of the air behind the cars

maybe F1 cars should do away with front and rear wings altogether and just be permitted to run fan-assisted ground effects aero so the downforce levels don't change near other cars?

The solution to the whole 'no refuelling' balls-up seems amazingly simple to me

Bring refuelling back, BUT make it a rule that the fuel hose has to have been disconnected from the car, and the hose man have stepped away BEFORE any of the tyre crew are allowed to touch the wheels. No more cars trundling down pitlane with the hose attached, strategy restored.

Easy.

Just thinking of this, maybe, has the FIA mandating smaller rear wings on these cars having an effect of some sort? Smaller rear wing = less drag and a smaller slip stream for the following car?

Btw, I noticed during the commentary about bridgestone making the front tire smaller for this year... Why didn't they make the rears a little larger to bring back car balance, which would in turn have made them less dependant on aero! Yet still achieve and same goal??

I know it absolutely will not happen, but I'm crossing my fingers for re-fuelling for Melbourne in two weeks...

Edited by Marco-R34GTT

the problem's not refueling, that has always been a "fake" way to spice up the racing.

Just ditch this 2 hour procession crap and run 3x 20min sprints instead. Add reverse grid to the second race if you want some excitement.

most of the 'overtaking' in recent years has been done in the pit lane, based on stop-strategies

seems this year it'll happen by the other two common methods; mechanical f**k-up or being out on the wrong tyres when it starts to rain

as a footnote, I did get quite a chuckle when Lewis inherited P4 back after McLaren brought Button in and baulked Rosbergs pit exit- Machiavellian maybe, but a good example of the limited scope teams have to influence a driver's track position.

p.s no way in hell Red Bull can do a wheel change in 1.8 sec :cool:

But to me the tension to see the lap times drop as drivers went a few laps longer tryign to jump spots then defend on cold tyres on a heavier / different fuel load was still great viewing. It wasnt quite Button at Brazil every round, but the races were at least interesting watching the strategies work or...or not. Button on 2 stops vs Rubens on 3, ditto Webber v Vettel on different stops etc etc

this is the truest statement. the v8s were great on the weekend. big anti-climax on sunday night.

was a little bit of action at the back of the pack but far out.....it was boring. :cool:

glad i gave melbourne a miss this year, except the fact im missing out on bar20.

big problems.

wow.

just watching the replay on one. 11 laps in, no sign of action. off to mythbusters.

these guys have pulled off an amazing feat in the off season in making F1 *less* interesting than v8 supertaxis!

great to see new teams at last instead of the same old crap. but the racing is rubbish

I think the engine and gearbox usage rule has ruined the sport also. Lift the engine development freeze and allow as many engines and gearboxes with no V8 gheyercar rev limiter!

agree with that too. it's another way of cheapening the sport. and I don't mean keeping the cost down... it makes the sport look cheap. F1 is supposed to be the bloody pinnacle of motorsport with boundless spending on useless crap. I want to see engines running a bees dick away from exploding every single lap and at the end of the race they take out that molten smoky engine and put in a nice new fresh one for next time.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
×
×
  • Create New...