Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Going camping this weekend.. will be taking lots of pics for week 5 photo!

Waterfalls... possible star-trails... also taking lots of LEDs along so might get some cool jay019 style shots :happy:

cant wait to see them :D

Matt, it's a ND1000. There is a nice table on the wiki showing how many f-stops and light the different ones let through: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutral_density_filter

And as for Project 52: I haven't been slack taking photo's.. just been slack processing them!

Matt, it's a ND1000. There is a nice table on the wiki showing how many f-stops and light the different ones let through: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutral_density_filter

And as for Project 52: I haven't been slack taking photo's.. just been slack processing them!

LOL. Maybe just rename it to Project 26? :sick:

ND1000! lol, yeah I'm reasonably read up on ND filters just never really considered using them till I saw your shots :sick:

What size/brand and where did you get yours from? I need a 77mm for my canon 10-22 lens

ND1000! lol, yeah I'm reasonably read up on ND filters just never really considered using them till I saw your shots :D

What size/brand and where did you get yours from? I need a 77mm for my canon 10-22 lens

Haha thanks :(

Thought you might not have... as I specified "Photo was taken using ND3 (x1000) filter..." when I posted the photo

I just got mine from ebay. It's a B&W 77mm. Got it for my 10-20, would also fit my 70-200 but doubt I'd ever do that!

nice shots man.

Definatly going to grab one of those filters to have a play with. might wait till i get a 10-20mm lens though. the 17-85mm probably wont cut it for the type of shots you could use it for.

Traditionally they are good for landscape shots - which 17mm would be fine for IMO.

Unless you are going to buy a wide angle anyway - I wouldn't buy a wide angle just for the ND filter's sake.

Maybe check the sizes - you might be in luck and be able to use it on both (unlikly)

however my 10-20 and my 70-200 for example are both 77mm

so I can switch my uv, skylight, cpl and nd between them

Haha thanks. Have an old four wheel drive and love camping. Went camping last weekend at Springbrook. Rained almost the whole weekend :)

But its an awesome spot - lots of walks and its very 'rain-forestry' - so will have to go again sometime!

Yeah springbrook is pretty nice.

That creepy photo from the Feb thread with the girl in the window was from the cabin there at the mouses house..

I'm planning on getting a 10-20mm or similar lens anyway Zennon. as most of the things i enjoy taking photos of are landscapes.

my 17-85mm is only 67mm so i doubt it will fit on a 10-20mm.

I'll Just add it to the enormous want list i have i guess.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...