Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

i knew that one would spark something, yet being honest.. its not a typo.. I have my reasons, and you have my msn LOL

edit for PM-R33 : yes, i am building a street/circuit car dependent on mid range power on a standard RB25.. i do not plan to develop my motor

OK to clarify, the setup im looking at will have roughly 200rwkw @ 4krpm, that is power i can use.

i knew that one would spark something, yet being honest.. its not a typo.. I have my reasons, and you have my msn LOL

edit for PM-R33 : yes, i am building a street/circuit car dependent on mid range power on a standard RB25.. i do not plan to develop my motor

OK to clarify, the setup im looking at will have roughly 200rwkw @ 4krpm, that is power i can use.

Well I personally wouldn't recommend looking at running anything smaller than a GT3076R for that kind of torque - off the top of my head you'd need substantially over 1bar of boost to do that, and any turbo smaller than a GT3076R at that boost level is going to be getting quite inefficient at the higher rev ranges when trying to pump that kind of air.... you really don't want to be running a street/track car beyond the efficiency of a turbo on the track if you want the engine etc to last.

i knew that one would spark something, yet being honest.. its not a typo.. I have my reasons, and you have my msn LOL

edit for PM-R33 : yes, i am building a street/circuit car dependent on mid range power on a standard RB25.. i do not plan to develop my motor

OK to clarify, the setup im looking at will have roughly 200rwkw @ 4krpm, that is power i can use.

Going from my dyno graph my car makes 200kw@115km/h in 4th gear.

Going from my dyno graph my car makes 200kw@115km/h in 4th gear.

My Rb20 with a TD06 makes 200rwkws at 118km/h in 4th gear on its way to 260rwkws (between 130kmh and 182km/h it makes over 240rwkws)

With the extra compression and displacement of the RB25 i hope they can make a bit more grunt at that road speed. If they cant then i suggest people throw R32 diff gearing in their car, far cheaper :)

My low down power is one of the better ones i have seen on these forums for a RB25, one of the only better ones was Warlords GTRS setup but that was on a freshly built forged engine.

Well thats exactly it, the RB20 diff gearing is different to a RB25 (4.363 compared to 4.111), therefore you comparing yours to mine at road speed is irelevant.

And i wouldnt want any closer gearing, with 300rwkw its going to be bullshit enough as it is.

Edited by PM-R33

Runs 20psi, the stupid Microtech internal MAP sensor is only rated to 20psi so we can't tune above that, however the turbo doesn't really make any more power past 20-21psi on my setup i have found.

Edited by PM-R33

263kw@wheels was the last tune on my tuners dyno, every one reckons his is low reading but i dunno, maybe the others around town are higher reading. Regardless of that he's the only tuner i use so i keep the same dyno every time i do more to the car to keep things in comparison. Thats the turbo pretty much maxed out in that setup, with a more aggresive tune it might make a bit more but we like to keep things safe due to the extreme heat and humidity we get up here so we left it at that.

Next tune will be soon with a couple of extra things added to the car, hoping for around that 300kw mark if the thing holds together and doesn't let go :) Good old factory internals have a bit of a habit of not wanting to play ball anymore.

Edited by PM-R33

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
×
×
  • Create New...