Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Here in sweden we absolutle love the E85.

As an exemple we got a friends R33 gtr making 1119 hp in the engine and 931 whp.

I´ll check what comp ratio he´s using and get back to you all. perhaps i can find how thew but the ingnition to.

i tuned a 200,000km rb30et NA single cam (9:1) with a gt30 and sc14, it made 300rwkw @ 22psi (full boost at 2000) on pulp only mod to engine was arp head studs and a 2nd hand rb26 greddy head gasket we had lying around. With E85 we would have seen mid 300's easy.

Dont be scared with the comp on E85 ;) 10:1 ftw.

ash

ever tyred to fart with an apple in your arse

thats what a 36mm restrictors does

It's only restricting the boost though - nothing else.

If boost was a constant (as it is in this case) then there should still be a sizeable increase.

The results i was talking about were JUST the fuel/tune changes as well. Not alterations to the amount of boost being used.

Boost was again a constant figure.

Only 40hp from E85 with 15 extra degree's of timing with 40% fuel extra?

That doesn't sound right at all. Generally people are getting 35-50rwkw gains, not 15-20

theres your issue for starters (long way off), and if tuned correctley an SR20 wont like an additional 15 degrees either....

Well two points,

It was tuned to the ragged edge to begin with,

and it's an SR, so you should expect about 2/3's the gain you would see from an RB.

Also the 40% more fuel was just to be extra safe, about 0.70 lambda... The test was just to do a quick comparison before changing the turbo and putting the restrictor on so 15 degrees was probably too far, the point was it didn't ping at all and e85 is fantastic S#%& that makes high comp turbo engines very possible!

Just needs to be made more available...

What do u mean :) , it's a SR, 4 cylinders which is 2/3 of a 6 cylinder! Same power gain per a cylinder equals 2/3 the total power gain.

I knew you would say that... i just didn't want to think you would...

Friends 4G in an EVO. 240rwkw on PULP, 280rwkw E85. Same again, 30-40rwkw gains just from fuel/tune changes.

Having 2 less cyclinders is well, rather irrelevant.

That is like saying a RB20 (2ltr/6cyc) will make more power @ the same boost/fuel than a SR20 (2ltr 4cyc), and that... well... couldn't be more wrong.

Yeah well an RB20 is a bit different, really comparing an SR20 to RB30 (didn't think i would need to clarify that), tho i tend to think total power comes down to bore size rather than displacment so RB25 and RB26 also compare, just the revs shift.

I just went and checked what the actual figures were (my memory it not great sometimes) and it was exactly a 25fwhp gain, but it was with a restrictor all along, and obviously not optimised on e85. The engine went on to make a further 65hp more than that by only changing the turbo, same restrictor and e85, so a 90hp gain in total just from turbo and fuel.

Unrestricted is a completly different story when you can add so much more boost on e85.

Edited by twinvl
tho i tend to think total power comes down to bore size rather than displacment so RB25 and RB26 also compare, just the revs shift.

dam all those people wasting their money on 30dets for no gain whatsoever

and why the hell would you wanna stroke your v8 out to 383ci, complete waste of time isnt it? :thumbsup:

I knew i'd cop it 4 that comment...

More stroke means more torque and less revs.

Take an engine and stroke it, if ports and valves are left the same and cam durations etc. are optimized before and after you will generally come out with a similar power, or at least no where near as much % power gain as % displacement increased. There's a bit more to it with manifold runner lengths and sizes, but what it comes down to is bore size, as the ultimate power limiting factors are piston speed and area for valves.

Stroking is just easier and more torque makes a more driveable engine that u don't have 2 rev as hard. I have an rb30dett for that reason, but not for outright power.

You tell me what would have more potential for power, stroking an rb26 to 3 litres or boring it to 3 litres (if possible)?

I know what I would prefer :thumbsup:

I'm sure I've got some more comments to justify in there somewhere?

Sorry for going OT...

Edited by twinvl
I knew i'd cop it 4 that comment...

More stroke means more torque and less revs.

Umm....power = torque x rpm

and why to people always add timing untill it pings? 99% of engines will make peak torque and more power with less timing than what it does just before it pings.

Plus less timing = hotter exhaust gasses, which is win in a turbo car.

and NA cars will generally accellerate better with less timing as the piston isnt fighting its way up against a burning fuel mix.

im noticing a trend with E85 turbo cars in that they are a little lazier coming onto boost, which no doubt is due to the cooler nature of alcohol based fuels...then ontop the 20degs extra timing they run.

Umm....power = torque x rpm

and why to people always add timing untill it pings? 99% of engines will make peak torque and more power with less timing than what it does just before it pings.

That couldn't be less true for a turbo engine, i've never seen one that runs optimum timing, even on standard boost.

Until you run on good fuel that is, then if you don't run more boost or higher comp you might as well not use the good stuff.

Edited by twinvl
  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
    • OK, so regardless of whether you did Step 1 - Spill Step 2 - Trans pan removal Step 3 - TCM removal we are on to the clean and refill. First, have a good look at the oil pan. While you might see dirty oil and some carbony build up (I did), what you don't want to see is any metal particles on the magnets, or sparkles in the oil (thankfully not). Give it all a good clean, particularly the magnets, and put the new gasket on if you have one (or, just cross your fingers) Replacement of the Valve body (if you removed it) is the "reverse of assembly". Thread the electrical socket back up through the trans case, hold the valve body up and put in the bolts you removed, with the correct lengths in the correct locations Torque for the bolts in 8Nm only so I hope you have that torque wrench handy (it feels really loose). Plug the output speed sensor back in and clip the wiring into the 2 clips, replace the spring clip on the TCM socket and plug it back into the car loom. For the pan, the workshop manual states the following order: Again, the torque is 8Nm only.
    • One other thing to mention from my car before we reassemble and refill. Per that earlier diagram,   There should be 2x B length (40mm) and 6x C length (54mm). So I had incorrectly removed one extra bolt, which I assume was 40mm, but even so I have 4x B and 5x C.  Either, the factory made an assembly error (very unlikely), or someone had been in there before me. I vote for the latter because the TCM part number doesn't match my build date, I suspect the TCM was changed under warranty. This indeed led to much unbolting, rebolting, checking, measuring and swearing under the car.... In the end I left out 1x B bolt and put in a 54mm M6 bolt I already had to make sure it was all correct
    • A couple of notes about the TCM. Firstly, it is integrated into the valve body. If you need to replace the TCM for any reason you are following the procedure above The seppos say these fail all the time. I haven't seen or heard of one on here or locally, but that doesn't mean it can't happen. Finally, Ecutek are now offering tuning for the 7 speed TCM. It is basically like ECU tuning in that you have to buy a license for the computer, and then known parameters can be reset. This is all very new and at the moment they are focussing on more aggressive gear holding in sports or sports+ mode, 2 gear launches for drag racing etc. It doesn't seem to affect shift speed like you can on some transmissions. Importantly for me, by having controllable shift points you can now raise the shift point as well as the ECU rev limit, together allowing it to rev a little higher when that is useful. In manual mode, my car shifts up automatically regardless of what I do which is good (because I don't have to worry about it) but bad (because I can't choose to rev a little higher when convenient).  TCMs can only be tuned from late 2016 onwards, and mine is apparently not one of those although the car build date was August 2016 (presumably a batch of ADM cars were done together, so this will probably be the situation for most ADM cars). No idea about JDM cars, and I'm looking into importing a later model valve body I can swap in. This is the top of my TCM A couple of numbers but no part number. Amayama can't find my specific car but it does say the following for Asia-RHD (interestingly, all out of stock....): So it looks like programable TCM are probably post September 2018 for "Asia RHD". When I read my part number out from Ecutek it was 31705-75X6D which did not match Amayama for my build date (Aug-2016)
×
×
  • Create New...