Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

As for thread top secret ftw (i also have a full top secret kit)

as for vertex/bn style kits i cant stand the front / rear of them.. i'm not sure why but dare i say it.. veilside rear bar looks better then the fugly square things that stick out a mile in real life.. imo

in saying that though id still prefer the vertex style over the veilside front and sides (i actually really like the side skirts of the vertex style)

dont wana start a shit fight here but how on earth could u pick on BN rear bar when ur rear bar looks like its got a little foot well step in the side incase you want to climb on the boot (refer to ur sig photo for an example).

I completely agree with you, its the thing i hate most about my car.

I was just saying i also dont like the BN looks a bit funny in my eyes (also the front looks like it needs to push some snow somewhere or something). The 400R rear bar looks nice and simple and blends in nicely with most side skirts imo

also my rear bar is actually just pods and yes pods are fugly unless there the stock ones lol.

http://img360.imageshack.us/img360/8348/f275ab37sg1.jpg

As for thread top secret ftw (i also have a full top secret kit)

as for vertex/bn style kits i cant stand the front / rear of them.. i'm not sure why but dare i say it.. veilside rear bar looks better then the fugly square things that stick out a mile in real life.. imo

in saying that though id still prefer the vertex style over the veilside front and sides (i actually really like the side skirts of the vertex style)

Top Secret +1! i gotta agree with ya about the veilside REAR bar

i do like it because of the curves it gave my car. anything else of veilside is pretty damn :down:

post-42381-1266203634_thumb.jpg

post-42381-1266203659_thumb.jpg

mind the wheels :ermm: made the noob mistake of ordering the wrong offset :down:

the kit im after is a mixture with a trust style front bar and jun sideskirts and rear bar i think this will look like porn

or it'll look like three different styles from three different kits on one car.

its a bit hit and miss, make sure the angles and the lines match up and flow from one to another.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...