Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

As for thread top secret ftw (i also have a full top secret kit)

as for vertex/bn style kits i cant stand the front / rear of them.. i'm not sure why but dare i say it.. veilside rear bar looks better then the fugly square things that stick out a mile in real life.. imo

in saying that though id still prefer the vertex style over the veilside front and sides (i actually really like the side skirts of the vertex style)

dont wana start a shit fight here but how on earth could u pick on BN rear bar when ur rear bar looks like its got a little foot well step in the side incase you want to climb on the boot (refer to ur sig photo for an example).

I completely agree with you, its the thing i hate most about my car.

I was just saying i also dont like the BN looks a bit funny in my eyes (also the front looks like it needs to push some snow somewhere or something). The 400R rear bar looks nice and simple and blends in nicely with most side skirts imo

also my rear bar is actually just pods and yes pods are fugly unless there the stock ones lol.

http://img360.imageshack.us/img360/8348/f275ab37sg1.jpg

As for thread top secret ftw (i also have a full top secret kit)

as for vertex/bn style kits i cant stand the front / rear of them.. i'm not sure why but dare i say it.. veilside rear bar looks better then the fugly square things that stick out a mile in real life.. imo

in saying that though id still prefer the vertex style over the veilside front and sides (i actually really like the side skirts of the vertex style)

Top Secret +1! i gotta agree with ya about the veilside REAR bar

i do like it because of the curves it gave my car. anything else of veilside is pretty damn :down:

post-42381-1266203634_thumb.jpg

post-42381-1266203659_thumb.jpg

mind the wheels :ermm: made the noob mistake of ordering the wrong offset :down:

the kit im after is a mixture with a trust style front bar and jun sideskirts and rear bar i think this will look like porn

or it'll look like three different styles from three different kits on one car.

its a bit hit and miss, make sure the angles and the lines match up and flow from one to another.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...