Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ok, i'm not actually after a body kit, but i thought this would be a good place for everyone to just recommend exactly what they have on their own cars and get it out of their system...

k go

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/308404-reccomend-a-body-kit/
Share on other sites

hahahha great OP. i got a v1 aero set from Topstage in melbourne. it had to have an assload cut off and it still doesnt fit fantastically, but it doesnt look like everyother 33 i drive past in sydney :)

Stock now, had 400R front bar but fibreglass kept cracking on steep driveways and such, raised the car up to handle better on the track so maybe it wouldn't break every day now, only every other day....................

I like the stock kit (doesn't look like speed racer or FnF wanna be), plus the plastic is alot more forgiving.

Yes, I am a boring old bastard.

ok, i'm not actually after a body kit, but i thought this would be a good place for everyone to just recommend exactly what they have on their own cars and get it out of their system...

k go

hi i have a 2001 r34 gt-t 4 door series 2 sedan and i want to change the front bumper because its not what i like and is very resticting to what air can get to the radiator and intercooler,

can coupe r34 bumpers fit or do i need one specificly for a sedan . sorry for the poor spelling ,

Making custom C-West R34 Front for 33, wide guards front and wide GTR rear, C-West hood, Jun skirts and TS rear.

Good place for kits is Hybrid Customs also good for CF work.

Edited by Shoudi

multiple choice time!

Learn that your car handles better when its at a correct height for performance not looks. :rofl:

which is:

  1. a higher center of gravity height
  2. a lower center of gravity height

the lower you go, the better.

I can prove this with science.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...