Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi every one. This is my result today with a HyperGears ATR43G4 600HP turbo externally gated on a stock RB25det.

Its got a .82 turbine housing running a .70 Comp cover with anti surge slots. Turbo's not brand new I've been told it came off LOWRB's KKR high flow setup, now running a Hypergear's .82 ATR43 turbine housing with RB25's OEM bolt on dump pattern.

Modifications needed for installing:

It needed 1x 20mms spacers to space out the comp housing from manifold.

The inner water line had to be bend as turbine housing was in the way.

Turbo's got a 4inch mouth, which I relocated the Z32 AFM between cooler piping and bolted on a 4inch 45 degrees elbow pipe to a Pod filter.

My car's a 94 model R33 S1. Its got:

850cc high flowed injectors from Created

Ebay cooler kit

Tomei 260 Duration by 8.5mm lift Cams

3inch exhaust with metal cat.

Tail 38mm external gate vented to atmosphere (drilled on top of stock manifold)

Z32 AFM

Z32 ECU with nistune chip and modified loom

This car has previously tuned on HyperGear's high flowed turbo at 240rwkws.

Now. 301rwkws / 403rwhp on 18psi full boost at 4500RPM . Car’s feels very strong on road and goes crazy after 4500RPM :rofl:.

post-31034-1266475572_thumb.jpg

Turbo, installation, and dyno tune costed me a total of $1000. Big Thanks to Nick at Phase autos and Stao from Hypergear.

Edited by kwickr33

tomei cams might help it come on earlier? plus the better turbine housing not kkr crap lol.

what exhaust manifold are u using kwikr33?

my bad just read tial gate on top of stock manifold

Edited by l0WRB
tomei cams might help it come on earlier?

That's always a hot debate item :)

I had my GT3040 (600hp) .82 rear, making 17/18psi by 4200rpm (280rwkw) factory cams. That was with a rather restrictive 3" exhaust... so might have been sooner & more power but i'll never know that stories end! :rofl:

So it's always subjective about cams in a lot of cases. IMO you don't need them... i certainly didn't. Nor did guilt-toy on his setup (a larger GT35).

I know he was going to test some cams i think for the sake of it, not sure what eventuated there though...

I did some comparison on the dynosheet page. It appears that RB25det with cams has better response then the people who doesn't.

Today's tune is not bad, but its still got abit of miss up the top not sure if the stock coil packs are getting old.

But yea external gate and cams would make a difference to boost and power curve.

You sure? I thought all the part numbers for the Procams were for RB20/RB25/RB26 which would mean no VCT and that the Poncams which are only listed as RB25 ones with NVCS were the only ones that supported VCT.

Nice work! Its hard to see how laggy it is as the axis is in road speed not rpm. But it sure looks to sit at 300rwkw for a long time!!!

So you mean the turbo purchase, the installation of the turbo and the tuning was $1000?? Or excluding the purchase of the turbo?

You sure? I thought all the part numbers for the Procams were for RB20/RB25/RB26 which would mean no VCT and that the Poncams which are only listed as RB25 ones with NVCS were the only ones that supported VCT.

Mmm you might be right actually... :D

either way good result!

Its currently running a RB25de cam gear with out the VCT. The $1000 was including the turbo, installation, all the bits for it and dyno time. I don't think Stao would offer some thing like that unless he wants some one to guinea cop his new turbos :( . After a set of spark plugs she's running pretty smooth. I'm considering to rise 3 more psi and see what she gets. Stao will you pay for my dyno time :) ?

Nick believe KM/H is more accountable. I had a look through the dynosheet section and it seems KMH/RPM scale varies from dyno to dyno.

I'm taking a average sacle of:

1KM = 39RPM. So you can work it out:

65 : 2535

85 : 3315

105 : 4095

125 : 4875

145 : 5655

165 : 6435

175 : 6825

His dyno's analyzer is broken. it can only show Power , speed and torque at this stage. Probably can get the car to run on another dyno once its tuned.

kwickr33: Let me know when you want to run on more boost. I can cover your dyno time thats not a problem.

Nick believe KM/H is more accountable. I had a look through the dynosheet section and it seems KMH/RPM scale varies from dyno to dyno.

I'm taking a average sacle of:

1KM = 39RPM. So you can work it out:

65 : 2535

85 : 3315

105 : 4095

125 : 4875

145 : 5655

165 : 6435

175 : 6825

His dyno's analyzer is broken. it can only show Power , speed and torque at this stage. Probably can get the car to run on another dyno once its tuned.

kwickr33: Let me know when you want to run on more boost. I can cover your dyno time thats not a problem.

id say hes too lazy to calibrate the rpm :) jks

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • What does it look like with highway driving? And yes, I had a similar thought as Duncan. It looks quite similar in my Stagea and I have made myself accept it as normal. Might have to look into it some day  
    • While I was waiting for the new parts to come in for the charge pipe and radiator I decided to do some turbo modification. The drive pressure (exhaust backpressure) was a lot higher that I thought it should be. For 32lbs of boost drive was 55lbs. The turbine housing is a 1.10AR and my turbo builder has suggested to go to a 1.25AR. To test if a larger AR would do anything to reduce drive pressure AND not spend any money I decided to hog out the divider in my current housing. I removed it from the inlet and the whole way through the housing.  After reassembly and testing it doesn't look like this modification did anything for reducing drive pressure or requiring more fuel (making more power). Oh well, it was worth a shot. We'll get some data at the track if it makes it past the 60ft. I also machined a $7 shift knob off Amazon to fit my Stillway shifter since I didn't like the Stillway shift knob. Next on the list was the radiator replacement and fabrication of a new intercooler tube that had no silicon coupler. No pictures of this - I was short on time each night after work to get this done and didn't stop to take pictures.  Next was to get the clutch disks out and replaced. Previously when installing the dogbox I had ordered a set of the same sintered iron disks I had been running because I switched to the 26-spline input shaft. I thought it was odd that they didn't have any markings or brand name on them like all my old disks had but installed them anyway. At the track I could not get the clutch to lock up using my normal strategies. After two track nights I reached out to the clutch manufacturer and ask their thoughts. They said they had to switch the material out because they were having trouble getting the original material and that this new material would not take to being slipped very well.  So out with the first set of 26-spline disks and in with the correct material 26-spline disks. While I had the trans out I added an inspection/service hole. I've wanted one of these for a while. Now I can have a look at things and change the front cover shimming when needed (clutch wear). I hustled and got the clutch change done in a few hours on a Saturday. Hopped in the car and drove home. On the way home I did a 1-3 pull. When shifting from 2nd to 3rd the core plug in the back of the cylinder head popped out and dumped all the coolant. Thankfully I was only 30 seconds from home and coasted it there. Datalog showed nothing unusual and 2.5psi of coolant pressure. That plug has been in there since 1992 but I guess it worked its way out. Pulled the trans AGAIN and replaced the plug, JB welded it in, and made a brace. Also deleted the head drain I had added in during the bearing issue fiasco.  I am currently changing my boost control plumbing to make it cleaner. After that is done I'll make another attempt at getting past the 60.
    • Are you 100% sure this isn't tune related?
    • 140-150 across the board. At this point hoping the grounding harness fixes it. My grounds are all tied to the chassis and none to the battery. For SR and KA that’s never been a problem for me but had a few other guys here and Reddit who told me RB really like a very solid ground setup tied to the battery so going to try that next, I’m stumped if that doesn’t do it. Never had a car have spark and fuel and not fire off before. Only thing I can think is the spark is intermittent/weak because of grounds nothing else really makes sense at this point 
    • I am having close to the same issue. Can you help me with what wire you grounded to get your pump to trigger?
×
×
  • Create New...