Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 122
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Are we talking about what i have or whats on ebay... so whos going to tell me what iv got???

I'm not planning on building the engine around turbos as i said earlie. Sell them off and start on a new stroker.

well from what you are saying and the ID tag and the 10 blade turbine it seems like they are 2835s. but considering how awful they are even in external gate form they are going to be even worse in restrictive tiny, low mount internal gate housings. they will be laggy as hell and with the smaller housings you will be loosing top end potential too (compared to the ext gate high mount versions).

the T04Z idea is a bad one too. they are old tech, rubbish turbo. they are just not a well matched combo on a RB26.

the GOOD options are:

twin 2530s or -5s for street/track/drag

twin GTSS -7s/R34 N1s for street/track

or if you want single look at some of the borgwarner offerings, or some new tech garret stuff. there are much better singles than a T04Z.

I don't see the problem in building an engine around a set of turbos. Actually it's a fairly good philosophical perspective for an engine build.

Atmospheric engines are built around the physics (pressure, flow behaviour, density) of our existing atmosphere.

They look to be 2835's. 10blade turbine wheel at 56mm, say 2835 on the housing, measured as 71mm compressor (56 trim) on the housing. Probably sitting in small T3 housing blended into a T28 footprint - just like 2835's.

I give up.. I'm gonna take the all your advice that they aren't what they seem ill put them on my engine. With stock manifolds and stock cams. And if they are 2560 or what every the fark you think they might be i should see reasonable response with decent power... if not not my rep that's gonna take a hit ill be sayig your the ones who gave me the info. ''Skyline guru's'' I'm also going to discard the info 2 turbo places have given me about them. Cause i have had enough of this i told yo so shit.

Your right, me and all my info gathering is wrong... HAPPY NOW. Oh I'm sorry for disagreeing with the ''skyline guru's''

Only other thing to check to completely confirm is the turbine exducer diameter (tip diameter). Typically 84 trim so 52mm (51.8mm).

And hell why not confirm the inducer diameter of the compressor wheel? Should be 53mm for 56trim.

http://www.hksusa.com/products/?id=709

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...