Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

anywayy

look retard, we have a thread/section full of 4 door porn that you don't own. no need to repost half of it in this thread.

have you applied for the exemption yet? what are you gonna do if you don't get it?

ill apply when i get my p's

if they dont approve i guess ill drive it around...

also

No need to apply in vic anymore, it goes under auto exemptions!

From vicroads website:

Exemption to drive a probationary prohibited vehicle

1. Automatic Exemption

The Road Safety (Drivers) Regulations 2009, automatically exempt a probationary driver, from the probationary prohibited vehicle restrictions, who is driving the vehicle in the course of his or her employment and at his or her employer’s request or is self employed and an Australian Business Number (ABN) is in force in relation to the person's business. No exemption document is required from VicRoads in these circumstances. However, the onus is on the driver to provide evidence to the police if requested.

A person is not permitted to drive the vehicle at any time for social reasons or reasons unrelated to work. In these cases the onus is upon the driver to provide evidence to the police that his or her driving is work connected.

A member of the police force who is the holder of a probationary car licence and the holder of an approved Driver Certificate Endorsement for a vehicle of that class is authorised to drive a probationary prohibited vehicle in the course of duty. No exemption document is required from VicRoads.

Link:

http://www.vicroads.vic.gov.au/Home/Licenc...tedvehicles.htm

and in a couple of months i will no longer have a social life..... just work work work

Edited by Mohsen
ill apply when i get my p's

if they dont approve i guess ill drive it around...

also

and in a couple of months i will no longer have a social life..... just work work work

post prediction for Nov 2010:

HEY YOU GUIZE, TEH FKN COPS DON'T THINK I'M ALLOWED TO DRIVE MY CAR AND PULL ME OVER ALL THE TIME. LULWUT?

They keep pulling me over to make sure I'm allowed to drive it, then when I give em a weak ass excuse they find things that are wrong with my car and defect me.

Also, how comes they don't believe me my work hours include 8pm and 3am?

haha wasnt she the one treating you mean?

Nah, I've got it pretty good actually :wub: She'd bend over backwards to do anything I want her to do.

..That sounded wrong :) But yes, that too.

I want a evo, nick swap :)

haha why the change?

Dude, I just said I'm getting rid of my spacers lol. Just sold them actually.

I might get a 5mm spacer, but not definite.

dont get slip on, either 10mm custom jobbies, or 15mm hub centrics

I won't say the business that I bought the wheels through.. but I was expecting them to be in good condition.

Turns out they were structurally damaged and needed extensive repair work.

Wheels were: $1650

Repair: $700

Tires: $1100

So around $3500 all up. Worth over 40% of the car price haha...

expensive to buy in the first place

*facepalm* just sell the fucking wheels.

moving on.

awesome:

mmm saw that on facebook

hawwt

so i decided a little while ago to bolck off my bov for a leak finding exercise....

long story short, i noticed that my car runs the same whether the bov is blocked or not

many people report that blocking the bov makes the car have aids (with the stalling and what not)

people that complain about stalling etc usually have a very very mildly modified car

people with properly modified cars have a standalone ecu that normally ditches the closed loop 02 sensor

so my theory of the day is that blocking the bov only affects cars with the closed loop switched ON

yes? no?

apparently does it only mildly modified cars to?

my car runs the same with it blocked off

edit: 12am - 11:59pm fyi

epping tmu are going to love you

leigh fk that. last girl i had a proper crack at gave me signs for about a week or two and then completely turned around. now she's standoffish and told a 'mate' of mine "i think he likes me but im not sure what i feel". 'mate' cos flamin mongrel has been trying to hook in w her behind my back

solution, fk them both off, basti's happy, world still revolves

[gayness]

Yeah, I think I'll keep seeing her see what happens but not get in too deep, because it can always just fark you up.. keep the 'shields up' so to say.

[/gayness]

leigh how i can get the 4GB mkv of broken arrow off you ?

i download a 2.7gb mkv but its jap subtitles in the mkv so bugger that

You mean this? :cool:

Broken.Arrow.1996.BluRayRip.720p.x264-NWO.mkv

I havn't even watched it :) but yeh not sure the best way I could get it to ya.. 30mbps dl / 1mbps up means it will take a while over the net :down:

haha why the change?

No change I still love my car but saw a nice evo 7-8-9 MR (nfi about evos really) with defis the other day.. needless to say I jizzed in my pants and at that moment I was like dammit should have got a evo! was so sexy. Like I said though I'm still loving the GTR and making people giggle like a little girl when they hop in :P

i giggled in the R32 when we test drove it.. loll hehehehe

i guess when your not used to something with some balls even a little power makes you smile like a deranged rapist

Edited by Mohsen
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...