Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Being built by advanced and tuned by JEM I doubt anyone will question the numbers.

Interesting about the breather being normal for that power level, not something I expected.

Being built by advanced and tuned by JEM I doubt anyone will question the numbers.

Interesting about the breather being normal for that power level, not something I expected.

Because u dont normally see it.

Out of site out of mind :)

It's the catch can breather.

For anyone possibly doubting the numbers, it ran 10.7@147mph at WSID with 490rwk. Next time out with 536rwk should do 150mph+

The car is also on the Motive 16 Drag battle DVD.

I'm questioning the numbers! That was 10.2@147 not 10.7! :)

Being built by advanced and tuned by JEM I doubt anyone will question the numbers.

Interesting about the breather being normal for that power level, not something I expected.

This was the first thing I noticed as well

Seems odd to keep pulling those numbers with that happening

It was mainly in relation to that...

I'm questioning the numbers! That was 10.2@147 not 10.7! :)

Yeah I wasn't sure if it was 10.7 or 10.2 :D

Edited by SRS13
  • 2 weeks later...

I might be selling my 5858 BB turbo. Brand new, box hasn't even been opened!! After $1450 for it.

Thinking about going bigger (6262) as the engine being built will need a bigger turbo!

If interested PM me.

Edited by SRS13
  • 2 weeks later...

Finally got some numbers but its not done yet,

On the New motor, with the 6262 .84 TS BB CEA.

Run-in tune (super safe) verylow/negative timing, 9-10 psi. 210-220 rwkw.

Turbo is super responsive and perky even with the timing so low, I noticed instantly its very throttle responsive, its very possible my intake setup helps in this regard. But the way it moves the air so quickly I have a good feeling this setup will be pretty decent on the 30/25 with vct!

One noticable characteristic.. the turbo seems very loud. even on low boost. however i am moving from lowmount to high mount during this build, so that might be why i think that.

will be doing real tuning next week if all continues well. Will post numbers as promised when its done. Unfortunently still running hte PFC and Tomei Z32 as no one has purchased the gear yet.

-dale

Edited by SilverECR33

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...