Jump to content
SAU Community

Precision Billet Turbos


Recommended Posts

that one is defs a 2.8, asking for ya boi vims see if there is a graph for a 6870 on a 26

Think it made over 800rwhp for about 3000rpm which is just silly!

Not sure on a 2.6L, it would shit out power but be fairly laggy. Doesn't vims want a track car?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think it made over 800rwhp for about 3000rpm which is just silly!

Not sure on a 2.6L, it would shit out power but be fairly laggy.

Id agree with that, some good results happening on 3.0L and 3.2 stroker kits with the 6870 from what im seeing around.

Could be OK for a 2.6 if a small enough rear housing is selected, but it would be a issue up top end when at song. (depending on how hard you pushed it)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very very nice mate must come on song strong !

6466 is still my fav turbo, seen results range from 500- to over 600kw

No need for dirty big 6870's and 7175's etc

Haven't got it back yet. Imagine it would push towards 600 with another 3-5psi like other results I've seen.

Definitely a good choice for E85.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 6870 on my old built 25 made 525ish hp at 28psi compared to the 35R making 475ish at 30psi. On 38psi it's making 676hp but out of injector at 5700rpm. Should go low 700s at 8200rpm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you have a dyno graph or 38psi 2nismo?

I saw a dyno result of a 6870 on a 2.6 today with cams, low 30ish boost, make mid 500'sKw, was as laggy as hell, not very impressed, looked like a slug to drive on the street, nothing then all.

Seen a few like this so far on 2.6's, seems like the 6870 is more towards the extra 15% capacity that a 3.0L or stroker delivers.

Looks like 2.6's run a larger area under the curve on the 6466....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you have a dyno graph or 38psi 2nismo?

I saw a dyno result of a 6870 on a 2.6 today with cams, low 30ish boost, make mid 500'sKw, was as laggy as hell, not very impressed, looked like a slug to drive on the street, nothing then all.

Seen a few like this so far on 2.6's, seems like the 6870 is more towards the extra 15% capacity that a 3.0L or stroker delivers.

Looks like 2.6's run a larger area under the curve on the 6466....

It's a 1100hp turbo on a 2.6L, it was never going to be responsive. I would say my 6262 is right in the sweet spot for a 2.6L non drag application but it's rated at 705hp.

6466 would be a good all rounder for a 2.8L and a 6870 isn't too bad from what I have seen but more towards a drag power band.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a 1100hp turbo on a 2.6L, it was never going to be responsive. I would say my 6262 is right in the sweet spot for a 2.6L non drag application but it's rated at 705hp.

6466 would be a good all rounder for a 2.8L and a 6870 isn't too bad from what I have seen but more towards a drag power band.

I completely agree, 6262 or BW EFR 8374 is the biggest I would go on a real streetcar, up to 3.0L. I wonder how far off the compressor maps the 2.6 is with some of these giants? And I guess I will keep wondering because Precision doesn't need no stinkin' compressor maps!

Edited by HarrisRacing
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you have a dyno graph or 38psi 2nismo?

I saw a dyno result of a 6870 on a 2.6 today with cams, low 30ish boost, make mid 500'sKw, was as laggy as hell, not very impressed, looked like a slug to drive on the street, nothing then all.

Seen a few like this so far on 2.6's, seems like the 6870 is more towards the extra 15% capacity that a 3.0L or stroker delivers.

Looks like 2.6's run a larger area under the curve on the 6466....

No point until it has enough injector. Then you'll see the whole thing. Ethanol and a torque converter fill the hole that might otherwise be there with a petrol/manual.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

post-43866-14308189599098_thumb.jpg

Here are my recent results with a Precision 6262 twin scroll setup (Thanks PJ)

Racepace built and tuned rb26 with standard cams and e85.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I had a similar situation with my R32 GTS4. I replaced that solenoid, but it hasn't solved the problem. So its possible the pump is failing. It seems you need to drop the diff in order to do anything that might fix this. So its important to know exactly what the problem is. Or just replace / repair everything while the diff is out.
    • Yep, I was supprised. Its all about flow rather then housing size.  Doing G35-900 Vs ATR45SS-1 Next. 62mm V 61mm. 
    • Of course sometimes you cannot go with the cheaper alternative but I try to weigh it up for the application - am I competing or am I going to the track ten times p/yr. As long as there’s enough information out there to back the cheaper alternative as a good option I’ll go for that.   I’m a bit of a bastard though as it’s my job to reduce costs, particularly on non income generating assets. EUR 500 saved for the diff + EUR 1,000 saved on BC racing over Bilstein and then say EUR 300 versus EUR 600 on an off brand windscreen versus OEM (for example) soon accumulates. I mean, I’m probably gonna put the car in the ditch anyway. Absolutely do not take this as a justification for always buying cheap shitty parts, just a rationale for doing your research and considering what’s necessary for your application.    
    • All the above effort, time, swapping out parts in the dark (i.e. no O2 data). You're literally running in the dark.
    • Looks like both of my cars have pressure switch issues. The R32 GTR has 18 flashes on the ATTESSA controller which is "ETS pressure switch circuit". The 4WD light is intermittent, and often just restarting the car clears it. There is an $300 replacement option https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/285675135148?itmmeta=01HXN3YKRGKQ08GRZ5KFKKZWJT&hash=item428390a0ac:g:6CcAAOSwWxBltMEG so if it becomes a permanent issue and I can confirm that the switch is the issue, i have a solution. The NM35 is reporting C1208, and disconnecting the switch causes the 4WD light to go away. Translating from the Japanese shop manual "when the pressure is reduced to 2.6MPa (377 psi) or less: conduction occurs when the pressure increases to 3.8MPa (550 psi) or less: conduction is present. Reference: • Immediately after the E-TS actuator motor stops, the pressure inside the accumulator is high and there is no continuity." Not sure how good the translation is but from what i can deduce this means the switch is normally closed (NC) and as the pressure builds from 0 to 550 psi the switch stays closed, then opens and 550 psi. As the pressure drops from 550 psi to 377 psi the switch stays open then closes again at 377 psi. Is that how these things work? These pressures are a lot higher than the R32 ("control pressure 0-228 psi") but i'm hoping i can find a generic switch (like they've done for the R32) to use as a replacement. Maybe something like https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/355586397452?epid=1676016964&itmmeta=01HXN534AF22ACTG6TGDDQGEQ7&hash=item52ca99d50c:g:mAEAAOSw8ilmBcMh&itmprp=enc%3AAQAJAAAA8LtWdNlWHgyJ%2F3cbw25S2A1lde3qBi3fJii4T3lQavCz4kpqiD42SmBa4FocMvXCjcxiowHjb8vZ8%2BWxc53BkHv781tkStSnCDaenfGKC3bIp0keK20dfsn9LoPa3TfqaEmAydqqyKobgTdXsGGzsl%2BRjOVGuD8OIpOv%2B0wMl7aUtHg0iJtojbtzA%2BRS8Xfm8Ufjuvz4niwrqglAXFUbkL6J%2FGuHPeeECZhLBBN3iNM1Swl94Fv5zE95YK%2B5O6dxDN1ySNOjdMxkA8yaprbuwRHFQv1nlGh%2FWjekj6EUFR2%2FO4HTsoKtSAkY0Mj1w1uf1w%3D%3D|tkp%3ABk9SR6zFjKXtYw but with a lower close pressure, and thread adapter if required. Am i dreaming?
×
×
  • Create New...