Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'll go against the trend: GT-T if its a daily driver

A lot of people with GTR end up shelling out a lot more to fix problems, plus increased insurance costs and increased petrol costs. I wouldn't want to drive a GTR everyday, you'd be worried some dick will scratch it, key it, steal it, etc.

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

that's one vote at least for the GTT :(

Predator has a valid point. I wouldn't want to use a GTR for a daily driver, especially if it involved parking in crowded car parks, outside shopping malls and the like. There's no denying the GTR is the better car, but the GTT shouldn't be overlooked either...

Yeah...for that price I imagine you'd get a mint R32 GTR and probably have enough change to get a POS runabout for day to day, shopping trips and the like...

or spend it on mods...:(

:jump:

yep r32 gtr and then a shit box for daily driver. best of both worlds. you could pick up a shit box vl turbo for like 5k and a good a shit hot r32 gtr and probably have some change still.

then slowly mod the r32 bit by bit

r34 gt-t won't be a huge jump from your series 2 r33 gts25t, newer car, looks different, nice interior etc, but wont perform much differently. go the gtr :( my mate drives a 34 gt-t and keeps telling me he would like to get a 33 gtr.

I just sold off my R34 GTT and now i am seriously looking forward for an GTR, i mean any GTR.... dont be like me.... i think most of people here know i have an R34 GTT before. What i mean is that A GTR mean GTR ....

i dont think anyone understand this guy :D AND WHERES THAT GOD DAMN EMOTICON WITH THE BLUE HEADSCRATCHING GUY@!#@!#^!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • This. The R34 handbrake icon DOES come up when the brake fluid level is low. You might be sitting right on that threshhold. I have been down this diagnosis path and this was the solution (and it was pretty much as full as your picture is to begin with).
    • Unfortunately the cavaet to that is that while any scan tool should be able to read the code, the workshop will need a consult plug to OBD socket adapter. You don't have a location on your profile, where are you based?
    • @Haggerty this is your red flag. In MAP based ECU's the Manifold pressure X RPM calculation is how the engine knows it is actually...running/going through ANY load. You are confusing the term 'base map' with your base VE/Fuel table. When most people say 'base map' they mean the stock entire tune shipped with the ECU, hopefully aimed at a specific car/setup to use as a base for beginning to tune your specific car. Haltech has a lot of documentation (or at least they used to, I expect it to be better now). Read it voraciously.
    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
×
×
  • Create New...