Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello guys.. I just Got my Turbo package wcich is GT3040 with .63 exhaust housing, Tial 38mm wastegate and i also got an apointment with my mech. for the next thursday :) and he said after installation we power run it to see if i need to upgrade my Injectors and if so he will get me 600ccs (God help me with my fuel cunsumption ;)). so fingers crossed.

IF YOU GUYS WANT to know the resault i can post in this thread and let u all know..

JimX Thanks for you reminder pal... ;)

  • Replies 174
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

R31Nismoid and Rob77, his info says he has an R32. That would mean his injectors are 270cc, not 370.

ya, i was reffering to R0b77 when i was bring up all the formula's etc.

But you can substitute 370 for 270 or any other number really

and INASNT... remember it's RB20, so a .63 housing would go nicely.

0.63 is a rather small exh housing for a 3040, i got a 0.82 rear on mine

How do you knwo 0.63 is small? Check my post above. You haven't put yours on yet, might be a lag monster.

Guy here changed from 0.61 on HKS 3037 (bit smaller comp wheel only compared to 3040) to 0.87 and went from 256rwkW @ 1 Bar with full boost at 3500rpm to 280 at 1.2 bar but no boost until 5200rpm. Would be heaps slower on the road.

Gotta remember the A/R is a ratio, not an absolute number so if you have a big exhaust wheel then the area inside the exhaust housing will also be big to maintain the ratio of 0.63. And it's the area that gives the flow at the top end + the exhaust wheel diameter.

Probably find the gt3040 will spool up a bit quicker, I have a td06-20g comes on full boost around 4200rpm, thus far on 1bar we made 339hp. I have just started playing with my boost controller and wound it up to 1.1bar and it feels like its made a large difference, definately getting more wheelspin... eventually we'll get it on the dyno and tune it for 1.2bar I'll post the results when on hand.

Probably find the gt3040 will spool up a bit quicker, I have a td06-20g comes on full boost around 4200rpm, thus far on 1bar we made 339hp. I have just started playing with my boost controller and wound it up to 1.1bar and it feels like its made a large difference, definately getting more wheelspin... eventually we'll get it on the dyno and tune it for 1.2bar I'll post the results when on hand.

Rob your TD06 has the exhaust housing meant for a 13B rotory, so do you really think if you gave a Garret 3040 (Internal or external gate) a 1.12 A/R exhaust housing that it would still spool up quicker.

If you used the recommended Trust housing on your car (12cm^2), then it would provide a lot more midrange hit. The response you are getting could probably be matched by the bigger Trust TD06-25g (Trust recommend 10cm^2 for an RB25...remember what Freebaggin said about A/R sizes and wheel sizes :rolleyes: )

...but this aint a thread about Trust turbos, just pointing out that a turbos characteristics can vary a lot depending on the A/R housings used.

How do you knwo 0.63 is small?  Check my post above.  You haven't put yours on yet, might be a lag monster.  

Guy here changed from 0.61 on HKS 3037 (bit smaller comp wheel only compared to 3040) to 0.87 and went from 256rwkW @ 1 Bar with full boost at 3500rpm to 280 at 1.2 bar but no boost until 5200rpm.  Would be heaps slower on the road.

Gotta remember the A/R is a ratio, not an absolute number so if you have a big exhaust wheel then the area inside the exhaust housing will also be big to maintain the ratio of 0.63.  And it's the area that gives the flow at the top end + the exhaust wheel diameter.

Same guys that are putting my car together had a 3037 on a stock sr20 and made 300rwkw at 1.6bar and it had a 0.82 rear on it or similiar. The owner said it wasent laggy at all, and after seeing it being canned around the streets i agree with him.

The 0.82 seems to be the best combination for making good power without being a lag monster, as recommended by the shop that built my turbo.

Well, with 0.87 turbine housing boost is now coming in alot earlier, hard to know exactly, but experimenting with peak hold on power fc, I now get 1.2bar at 4200rpm, 3rd gear. ( and it was [email protected], not 280:D:p, 270 at 1.1bar, 300 at 1.5bar - top end was choking, which it doesnt feel like it is doing anymore:) -fitted new 90mm catback) - feels stonger everywhere now, on and off boost - but havent re-dynoed yet, so just seat of the pants, cant wait to get it up and push the redline to 8000rpm (before the exhaust upgrade power peaked at only 7000rpm before tapering back a little.)

anyways the car pulls hard, but boost doesnt come in quite as hard as with 0.61 housing (1bar at appox 3000rpm) - car was stepping out in 4th at 90-100kph and only a bit more than lazy accellerating - made it very scary to drive on the road in traffic, cos boost was like an on/off switch, and when it came on the back end would step out every time with as little as 1.2bar - the only way to control the car was by turning boost down:(

I can actually control boost with the right foot to a fair degree now, which is really nice, more boost, just push the right foot in a bit further. So gentle traffic driving, stays in traffic off boost no probs, at lights or if overtaking. I have 1.7bar set for the road, vs the 1.0 with the smaller housing.

Under 0.5bar, the boost comes in very linearly, from approx 0.5bar, she starts pulling hard.

but the best part is now I can control the boost ramp with my right foot to a fair degree, so no more surprises in heavy traffic - really is very nice to drive and very controllable.

All in all, alot better for the street, and much happier with the 0.87now, but wouldnt mind going a 0.73 to see how it compares (anybody got a spare one they want to sell/loan me?)

For interest too, and comparison to trust turbos, HKS rate their turbine housing sizes:

0.61 = 8cm

0.73 = 10cm

0.87 = 12cm

thats what the tags on the housings say when you buy them new anyways.

HKS actully recommend the 0.87 for the 3037 kit they sell for RB25.

I have done cams too (256/264) but I also dropped CR to 8.6:1 which I think it is fair to say would offset the increase from the cams to a fair degree.

anyway, sorry I waffled a bit

Steve

PS Lachlan, can you pm me the name and contact details of your dyno guy?

Cheers

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
×
×
  • Create New...