Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi LAD`S & LASS`ES,

OK RIDE HEIGHT`S WHAT you HAVE,

PLEASE PHOTO`S OF FRONT & REAR`S,

Type of SHOCK`S & spring`s PLEASE,

I will start with FRONT`S just need to fit rear`s to day & will POST ,

Ohlines with rsr spring`s,Stock & Ohlines now Ohlines is 35mm shorter then stock ok,

post-36964-1274849083_thumb.jpgpost-36964-1274848817_thumb.jpg

Cheer`s Chuckie.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/322241-ride-heights/
Share on other sites

Is your car green, Bob? If so, it's more of a twin to my car than Hugh (66yearold)'s or his son's - neither are s1 RS-Four's converted to manual!

Mine's lowered on the Sydneykid Bilstein/Whiteline set-up, no idea of front and rear ride heights, I'll have to measure them later.

Old photo:

NewWheels2.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/322241-ride-heights/#findComment-5255688
Share on other sites

Ok ,

Back`s in & ride height is 380mm :) ,

Rear Shock`s are NISMO,

so here`s rear height & pic of Shockie,

Side on of car too ,

post-36964-1274856319_thumb.jpgpost-36964-1274855998_thumb.jpgpost-36964-1274855154_thumb.jpg

Cheer`s Chuckie,

PS,SIDE ON PHOTO`S Would be BEST as we all see what car look`s like , :P:(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/322241-ride-heights/#findComment-5255865
Share on other sites

Yep my car's dark green like yours (not so keen on the light green) got an R33GTR box and looking for some R33 or R34 GTR rims!

Is your car green, Bob? If so, it's more of a twin to my car than Hugh (66yearold)'s or his son's - neither are s1 RS-Four's converted to manual!

Mine's lowered on the Sydneykid Bilstein/Whiteline set-up, no idea of front and rear ride heights, I'll have to measure them later.

Old photo:

NewWheels2.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/322241-ride-heights/#findComment-5256926
Share on other sites

Looking good there SABBAi mine is opposite to yours 340 rear and 330 front, I am thinking of changing it to 340 all round, bit worried about to much camber and killing my tires.

I hadn't even given the cv joint a thought

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/322241-ride-heights/#findComment-5258629
Share on other sites

Not sure what my car is at, but it's low and i had it up on the hoist today. The inside of my tyres are f**ked due to the camber! as are my front CV boots, Just more money i can spend on the car without adding to it's appeal. yay haha

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/322241-ride-heights/#findComment-5258997
Share on other sites

i'll point it out again in this thread, tyre wear is due to bad toe settings (excessive in or out)

you can have tyres last a long time with alot of camber

So i ha a quick look, what do i need to get to adjust toe setting?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/322241-ride-heights/#findComment-5259414
Share on other sites

I agree about the incorrect toe killing tires really quick because thats how i killed my first set they only lasted a year and totally bald.

if you have the right camber setting's your tires will last a lot longer then if your running a lot of camber from lowering your car, in time the inner corner of your tires will be worn and the outer will still have plenty of tread left, if you where running correct camber all of your tires would wear evenly,

well that how i understand it, correct me if i am wrong

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/322241-ride-heights/#findComment-5260415
Share on other sites

I agree about the incorrect toe killing tires really quick because thats how i killed my first set they only lasted a year and totally bald.

if you have the right camber setting's your tires will last a lot longer then if your running a lot of camber from lowering your car, in time the inner corner of your tires will be worn and the outer will still have plenty of tread left, if you where running correct camber all of your tires would wear evenly,

well that how i understand it, correct me if i am wrong

I know it will shag out the inner edge of tyres quicker than a sensible camber setting.

I am assuming the significant negative camber is being used for cosmetic reasons but I can't understand why a proper alignment wasn't done and all variables were checked and adjusted when new rims or suspension height changes were made.

To me it seems obvious that if you don't check and set all aspects you will get excessive tyre wear.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/322241-ride-heights/#findComment-5260565
Share on other sites

I know it will shag out the inner edge of tyres quicker than a sensible camber setting.

I am assuming the significant negative camber is being used for cosmetic reasons but I can't understand why a proper alignment wasn't done and all variables were checked and adjusted when new rims or suspension height changes were made.

To me it seems obvious that if you don't check and set all aspects you will get excessive tyre wear.

my comment wasn't directed at you wolverine, i was questioning mike's comments about the correct toe, I am no suspension expert but that was how i understood it

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/322241-ride-heights/#findComment-5260594
Share on other sites

i'll point it out again in this thread, tyre wear is due to bad toe settings (excessive in or out)

you can have tyres last a long time with alot of camber

???????????????????????????????????????????? assuming you rotate the tyres often and have totally neutral toe, what's your solution with negative camber (say, 3 degrees negative all round), to wear out the middle of the tyre?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/322241-ride-heights/#findComment-5260669
Share on other sites

of course if you run a lot of camber you'll get uneven tyre wear. that's pretty self explanatory.

my statement is that you can get plenty of life out of your cambered wheels if you have good toe settings. it is to do with camber thrust, which i won't go into detail, but this may explain it to most

When a wheel is set up to have some camber angle, the interaction between the tire and road surface causes the wheel to tend to want to roll in a curve, as if it were part of a conical surface (camber thrust). This tendency to turn increases the rolling resistance as well as increasing tire wear. A small degree of toe (toe-out for negative camber, toe-in for positive camber) will cancel this turning tendency, reducing wear and rolling resistance.
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/322241-ride-heights/#findComment-5260670
Share on other sites

???????????????????????????????????????????? assuming you rotate the tyres often and have totally neutral toe, what's your solution with negative camber (say, 3 degrees negative all round), to wear out the middle of the tyre?

you're missing my point i think, and i'm a little confused as to what you're trying to ask?

if you're running 3 degrees negative camber of course you're going to suffer from tyre wear to the inner edges, and if you rotate them you'll end up with worn shoulders on both sides with more tread in the middle - which is the norm.

if you want your tyres to wear dead even, then run zero static camber (which i wouldn't recommend) but even still they won't wear dead even due to independent suspension and dynamic camber (camber changes under load).

my original point is, if you want to get the most out of your tyres with a little negative camber, run a couple of degrees toe out

i hope that's helped?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/322241-ride-heights/#findComment-5260679
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...