Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

That GTST is a 2.8 not a 2.5

REgardless of what it is its living proof that a gtr is actually a handicap if you are going for all out 1/4 mile times.

There is simply no need to hump the extra weight around when a properly set up rear wheel drive can give you the whole 9 yards.

As for the ultimate 25...Ultimate for what ?I think I went damn close to building the ultimate allrounder, Just do a solid lifter conversion then build it the same as any rb.

We ended up with 400rwkw on pump with a 35r and full boost by 3800 rpm.

It was an amazing engine and just never stopped pulling all the way to the redline (8500)

I only did one 1/4 mile pass with it for a net of 11.3@125 mph. I have no doubt it had 10's with very little work.

I do like the current 30 i am running but i miss that 25.

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Thats what ill be getting made next i think.

3800rpm is impressive for a 35R.

Its all in the head mate. The head was a work of art but sadly it went to god when we dropped a valve spring.

In the process of building another solid converted head for the 30 right now actually.

REgardless of what it is its living proof that a gtr is actually a handicap if you are going for all out 1/4 mile times.

There is simply no need to hump the extra weight around when a properly set up rear wheel drive can give you the whole 9 yards.

As for the ultimate 25...Ultimate for what ?I think I went damn close to building the ultimate allrounder, Just do a solid lifter conversion then build it the same as any rb.

We ended up with 400rwkw on pump with a 35r and full boost by 3800 rpm.

It was an amazing engine and just never stopped pulling all the way to the redline (8500)

I only did one 1/4 mile pass with it for a net of 11.3@125 mph. I have no doubt it had 10's with very little work.

I do like the current 30 i am running but i miss that 25.

What cams and exhaust housing on the turbo were you using?

I'm trying to plan out the build on my RB25DET NEO in my 34, with 300-320rwkW being the initial plan with more desired come rebuild time (more revs).

What cams and exhaust housing on the turbo were you using?

I'm trying to plan out the build on my RB25DET NEO in my 34, with 300-320rwkW being the initial plan with more desired come rebuild time (more revs).

>82 rear housing. tomei cams. 10.25 lift. 260 degree inlet duration, 270 degree exhaust.

Your power figure is very doable. If you want to start going beyond that then you must get the planets to align.

Port match everything from the throttle body to the dump pipe, Fat ignition system etc etc.

>82 rear housing. tomei cams. 10.25 lift. 260 degree inlet duration, 270 degree exhaust.

Your power figure is very doable. If you want to start going beyond that then you must get the planets to align.

Port match everything from the throttle body to the dump pipe, Fat ignition system etc etc.

Yeah I'm leaning on 3076R with .6 housing, merge collector manifold, 260 Tomei cams in/ex, NissTune, 18 psi and all the supporting fuel and intake/exhaust mods.

My mates car just pulled 330rwkW on 18psi with basically that set up on a Neo so it definitely works.

If I could get a 35/40 on song by 3800rpm, I'd just throw one of them on the car straight away, but without serious head work I don't think it'd have a chance of flowing like that.

You got a build thread FineLine? Would be greatly interested to have a read of it and look at your development path.

Yeah I'm leaning on 3076R with .6 housing, merge collector manifold, 260 Tomei cams in/ex, NissTune, 18 psi and all the supporting fuel and intake/exhaust mods.

My mates car just pulled 330rwkW on 18psi with basically that set up on a Neo so it definitely works.

If I could get a 35/40 on song by 3800rpm, I'd just throw one of them on the car straight away, but without serious head work I don't think it'd have a chance of flowing like that.

You got a build thread FineLine? Would be greatly interested to have a read of it and look at your development path.

I dont have a build thread as such mate. it just evolved over a fairly long period of trial and error.

The real key IMO is the head. RB heads have an inherent flow mismatch between between the inlet and the exhaust. The inlet flows almost twice the exhaust side and anything you can do to even it up helps immensely.

Porting by a competent porter, valve size, cam selection all play a part. Get it right and the rb will ooze power.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
    • I don't know it is due to that. It could just be due to load on track being more than a dyno. But it would be nice to rule it out. We're talking a fraction of a second of pulling ~1 degree of timing. So it's not a lot, but I'd rather it be 0... Thicker oil isn't really a "bandaid" if it's oil that is going to run at 125C, is it? It will be thicker at 100 and thus at 125, where the 40 weight may not be as thick as one may like for that use. I already have a big pump that has been ported. They (They in this instance being the guy that built my heads) port them so they flow more at lower RPM but have a bypass spring that I believe is ~70psi. I have seen 70psi of oil pressure up top in the past, before I knew I had this leak. I have a 25 row oil cooler that takes up all the space in the driver side guard. It is interesting that GM themselves recommend 0-30 oil for their Vette applications. Unless you take it to the track where the official word is to put 20-50w oil in there, then take that back out after your track day is done and return to 0-30.
    • Nice, looks great. Nice work getting the factory parts also. Never know when you'll need them.
×
×
  • Create New...