Jump to content
SAU Community

The Mod I Didn't Want!


Appealing
 Share

Recommended Posts

These are extracts from my legal claim against a local Mechanical service company.... (RAC AND BOSCH Approved!!).

In August 2009, My car was serviced by a local company as a normal course of maintenance for the 100,000 km service.

This entailed changing of the timing belt, Tensioner bearing, Idler, bearing and at my request the water pump. All new parts were supplied. The km's on the car were 119,000. No fault had ever shown up on this engine, except a faulty coil pack on the ignition system.

No dismantling had ever been undertaken on the front area of this engine, before that service.

As such it was as Nissan built it, straight from the factory.

On Saturday 13th February the engine in my Series 2 stopped seemingly for no reason. I tried to restart it.

It would not start. I managed to get the car into a parking bay, and rang the RAC, the engine would not turn any more than about 45deg. Arrangements were made to transport the vehicle to my home.

Next day....

The front upper covers of the engine were removed and it showed that the idler bolt had broken thereby releasing the tension on the timing belt and allowing the valve train to go out of timing with the crank shaft.

On close inspection after fishing the idler pulley from the lower cover and belt, it was clear to see that the bolt had broken level with the idler where it would meet the engine block. There was however over 10mm of broken stud left protruding from the engine block. The broken bolt stud was only held in the engine block by about 2 threads. This clearly showed that the bolt had been unwound before the breakage occurred. As once the bolt had broken and the engine stopped rotating (almost immediately), no further unwinding of the bolt could take place, due to the disconnection of parts.

There are also noticeable marks and wearing on the bolt approximately 10mm under the head of the bolt. These can be clearly seen in the attached photo.

post-30601-1276514999_thumb.jpg

And here is what we found after I eventually had the head removed, I wouldn't do this until they gave me indication that they were going to pay. Luckily I don't HAVE to use my car.

post-30601-1276515398_thumb.jpg

And the new modded head, 5 valves per cylinder anyone?

post-30601-1276515465_thumb.jpg

This happened at a little above idle.... I was actually slowing down and had my foot on the brake, doing less than 30kph!!

After over 4 months of arguing and getting quotes etc, finally the mechanics insurer are settling.....

I will have approx $9000 to spend on putting another engine into the Stag...... if you think that's a lot, well it isn't..... we'll spend it all I think.

So watch this space for more info and pics as the rebuild starts......

Planning a ball bearing Garret internals to fit the stock turbo (cause as you can imagine mine is Rooted!).

Probably a Nistune piggy back to control it all and not lose the auto functions, etc.

Other than that, I just want the bloody thing back on the road.......

Edited by Appealing
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, that's some carnage. Sorry to hear about your little episode there, glad you are getting it sorted but OVER 4 MONTHS later... wow.

Just would like to point out, the Nistune is not a piggy-back, it's a complete real-time-tunable ECU remap. Which I use and recommend... at the offered price of around $400 (you can afford the time off the road to post away your ECU atm, I should think :)) it's the best value of anything out there, IMO. So long as your tuner can tune Nistune type 4 boards :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

interesting! particularly that the bolt was partially unwound. (and still didn't snap at the block!)

this is far from the first timing belt tensioner bolt that has snapped, and many people on here would recommend replacing it (and the idler stud) every time the timing belt is done. From memory, Elite Dan did some interesting testing on some bolts supplied by nissan after one snapped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same thing happened to me on our RB20 but at about 7,600rpm....ended up being pretty messy.....as Duncan said "many people on here would recommend replacing it (and the idler stud) every time the timing belt is done.".....I highly recommend it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

interesting! particularly that the bolt was partially unwound. (and still didn't snap at the block!)

this is far from the first timing belt tensioner bolt that has snapped, and many people on here would recommend replacing it (and the idler stud) every time the timing belt is done. From memory, Elite Dan did some interesting testing on some bolts supplied by nissan after one snapped.

Tensioner is a stud, idler is a bolt. Its seems to be the idler bolt that is failing, also happened to NYTSKY (i read his whole thread yesterday). Using new fasteners on such a critical part of an engine seems to be the go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yes, but Dave/NYTSKY's one was the engine builder's error in not doing it up correctly, looks like the same problem here. However I've also seen and heard of correctly tensioned ones failing.

I always replace both stud and bolt on the race car motors

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Been there done that with the R33 (pretty sure the idler bearing seized), it stripped the timing belt. Towed it to a workshop, just for shits and giggles they installed another timing belt and turned it over with no apparent issues. Turned the key and it started like new. Mr Valve must have given Mr Piston a miss.

The timing belt was on the wall of fame for a while there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well the amazing thing was as I said this was just over idle with the engine unloaded. I didn't hear a thing, until I tried to restart it, then the sound of what I knew would be engine damage. I still wasn't sure, the symptoms after that were same as dead battery.

The only really annoying thing for me was the way that the "Service" shop acted..... and I've known them for 20 years +. Firstly saying that it was just fatigue, and these things happen!! They didn't offer to strip it down to ascertain the damage. In the end I got fed up with playing games. I got an independent engineer's report done. The results were conclusive. The bolt was left untensioned, just as I thought. There was also a mark around the belt, that looked like the bearing had been running on it's edge (ie at an angle). This to me and the fact that it was definitely unwound after breaking, all added up to incompetence. They have looked after all my cars over a long time, but not any more.

I really didn't have a beef with the mechanic, he is a good guy. But I just wish that someone had said, "Yep, we f**ked up, let's get it fixed".

The mechanic was the head mechanic at the shop, and he wanted to do the job himself, as he knew how special the car is to me. I fully understood that he didn't do it on purpose and having 5 other mechanics to oversee, probably just got distracted. But really a "sorry" would have gone a long way! He has since left the shop over this incident, in his boss's words he was "gutted and upset at this having cost me so much money".

You've also got to love the wording on the "offer to settle", which actually says, "Without Prejudice & Without Admission of Liability"!!

So the only thing good to come from it is that the engine we found is a 54,000km one from a failed compliance, and I am going to get to bolt a few goodies on.

Thanks for the tip on ECU, I'll get it taken out and done straight away.

I've read all the topics on bolt breakage, and yeah some are a bit frightening.

It isn't a requirement (according to Nissan) to replace the bolt. But in this case, torquing it up would have saved $10,000, and a lot of inconvenience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

+1...Rb30's aren't the bank-breakers they used to be... :(

And if any car warranted it, it's our heavy busses. The 3L in my 32 is just silly, so much torque in such a little car.. one day teh wagon will get one too :glare:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

So at last this drama is nearly all over.... I had a 54,000km engine fitted and picked up the car last week. The engine is sweet. But what a job to have it done. In the end the whole engine and trans had to come out the bottom. Just have to do some tuning as it's having a nistune fitted. The std turbo is gone, (they dont mix with valve bits very well) so now have a steel impeller hi-flowed turbo on it.

It's great to have it back, just a bit of sorting to do, I'll post up the dyno results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good end result anyway John.

I had a 200,000Km service done on my VTiR Prelude (daily).

After stopping at a red light, I tried to take off, but the engine gave out > pushed it to the side of the road > NRMA mechanic revealed no compression. The car had done 218,000Km at that stage.

The idler bolt had bent over and snapped > timing belt stripped lengthways > valves never kissed > engine saved.

My mechanic wanted to pay for the lot; but we agreed to just share cost of parts (tow truck/belt/bolt/coolant). :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So at last this drama is nearly all over.... I had a 54,000km engine fitted and picked up the car last week. The engine is sweet. But what a job to have it done. In the end the whole engine and trans had to come out the bottom. Just have to do some tuning as it's having a nistune fitted. The std turbo is gone, (they dont mix with valve bits very well) so now have a steel impeller hi-flowed turbo on it.

It's great to have it back, just a bit of sorting to do, I'll post up the dyno results.

Put a decent dump pipe on that hiflow, I've got a split dump pipe you can have then you'll just need an exhaust shop to knock up a 3" front pipe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So after some Chat GPT (yeah I know lol..) it turns out that the R35 GT-R BMC conversion may not be suitable for our shit boxes as it splits the fluid 60:40 instead of 70:30. When looking at possibly doing the 370Z conversion, it seems it's quite similar to how the R35 GT-R booster & BMC mounts up, however after some additional digging the 370Z BMC bore is the same size as a R33/34 GT-R BM57 one. Brake Pressure Split: Nissan 370Z: The typical front-to-rear brake pressure ratio for the 370Z is approximately 70:30. This is designed to handle the car’s weight distribution and performance characteristics, favoring the front brakes heavily due to weight transfer during braking. Nissan R33 GT-R: The front-to-rear brake pressure ratio for the R33 GT-R is also typically 70:30. However, this ratio is tuned for the GT-R's specific weight distribution and dynamic performance, considering its all-wheel-drive system and higher performance expectations. Despite having the same nominal 70:30 ratio, the actual distribution of braking force in practice can be different due to other factors like vehicle weight, ABS and EBD systems, and brake component sizes. Bore Sizes: The bore size of a brake master cylinder affects the hydraulic pressure generated within the braking system and can vary between different vehicles based on their braking requirements. Nissan 370Z: The brake master cylinder typically has a 1-inch (25.4 mm) primary bore. The secondary bore can vary slightly depending on specific trim levels and brake options, such as the Nismo version or those equipped with the Sport Package which features larger brakes. Nissan R33 GT-R: The brake master cylinder in the R33 GT-R generally has a 1-inch (25.4 mm) primary bore as well. Given the GT-R's high-performance context and advanced braking system, the bore size is designed to provide sufficient hydraulic pressure for its braking needs. Comparison: Brake Pressure Split: While both vehicles use a similar 70:30 ratio in the brake master cylinder design, the actual operational distribution might differ slightly due to differences in brake system components, vehicle dynamics, and tuning for each model. Bore Sizes: Both the 370Z and R33 GT-R use a master cylinder with a primary bore size of around 1 inch (25.4 mm). This similarity helps in providing robust hydraulic pressure for effective braking. Additional Considerations: Braking System Design: The overall brake system, including calipers, rotors, and the master cylinder, is designed to work as an integrated unit. Even with similar bore sizes and pressure splits, the performance and feel of the brakes can differ due to variations in brake pad composition, rotor size, and ABS tuning. ABS and EBD: Both vehicles are equipped with Anti-lock Braking Systems (ABS) and Electronic Brake-force Distribution (EBD), which further modulate and optimize braking force between the front and rear wheels dynamically, depending on driving conditions and brake demand. In essence, while the 370Z and R33 GT-R have some similarities in their brake master cylinder specifications, they are tuned to meet the specific performance and handling characteristics of each vehicle.   TL;DR, just use a R33 BM57 and call it a day.
    • Straight thru's have so little restriction that it's almost certainly not worth worrying about effects on tuning. Even a centre offset shouldn't upset things, but would be noticeably more effective (quiet).
    • I did say "2x Magnaflows" then referred to a Varex. So to un-confuse that, my rear muffler is hot-swappable with a Varex. When I had a RB Turbo, I had the 2x Magnaflows, then went LS and though "Oh that's way too loud" and ordered a Varex. A mid muffler will definitely help a lot, even if straight through. SP Mufflers can make anything as big or as small as possible, which will help even more. Looking at my own exhaust I could make the muffler twice as long if I wanted to. Or you could go crazy and get 2x mufflers from SP and full every remaining space with muffling. In my experience closing the Varex makes the car run VERY rich (obviously). I'd say adding a muffler *will* affect things, on a technical, physics level, but I don't think you'd need a retune as the actual effect would be the car running a *tiny* bit richer due to more restriction, on a strictly physics level, but you kind of don't have any option if you want the car to make less sound.
    • I must have read 100 DIY's and watched 200 DIY Youtube videos with most people saying just grab a new cover and, well, despite my normal aproach to these things (replace it all!!) I didn't get a cover. I don't know why I didn't, I'd already ordered a bunch of bits from FCP and it would have made perfect sense to put that in the order.  Anyway, I'm not getting OEM as its just crazy money, even from the states its 900 ish delivered. So, I got an OE Elring one, same as they sell at FCP but local so I can get this fixed this week. Our X5 is waiting for a new diff so we find ourselves in a common scenario of having 2 broken BMW's on the driveway! 🤣
    • Big thing is available inputs for sensors and not having to run multiple expander boxes and software packages for different things why motec is up there. The link ecu and an aim pdm32 was a combination I looked at early on so get ecu, dash and pdm in one go. Aim logging software is pretty good and has all the tracks I will ever drive. Having logging setup with tracks already available is a big thing for myself so can click drop down and go. Thing that I keep seeing is the support what's needed and having a package that people in the know are familiar with as learning a new platform is time consuming.    Got a few boxes that arrived with bits while I was away so hopefully will fit a few sensors and make a start on the dump pipe today. Going to be interesting fitting a 3.5 inch exhaust on this and keeping it above the chassis rails. 
×
×
  • Create New...