Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

hahahah damn man I never though my question could be percieved as that.

I should rephrase and ask " what was the longest relationship you have been involved in with your girlfriend" ?hmm....

You funny clowns know what I mean.

me ? I have been together with mine for 4 years.

Gay couples included in this survey ok!

Guest 33GTS25

would you also count "casual relationships"

i.e the girl you keep for when your permanent partner is away or you need someone to help you complete a project when you fly interstate

because these are 2 different timeframes

i have been in my current relationship for nearly four years but my casual girl and i have been seeing each other since 93 when she was sixteen and living at home, i also have an occasional girl and her friendi see every three months when i feel the need to take the animal for a walk.

monogamy is for people who can't pull roots

rod

monogamy is for people with morals and values

Sleeping around is for people who want to gets aids. hahahah.

I am monogamous and who says I cant pull roots? :lol:

You know what aids stand for? Switch the word around backwords and you get.

SDIA ie.....

(S)stick (D)ick (I)n (A)rse.

Guest 33GTS25

yes but hustler, have you repaired your lilo pump yet :lol:

girlfriends come in very handy for when you couldn't be bothered going out looking for action

i think we need to be careful where this thread is heading as Shell will probably end up reading it tonight while we are all asleep and we will wake up to the land of many flames tee hee

rod

you guys are a crack up.

you have to show how manly you are by where you keep your girl friends and how many you have.

Show us how manly you are by how long you can stay with one woman.

personally I' ve been married 2 times I did 8 years the first time and Ive been with my wife (now) for ten years.

and yes I can pull the birds but hey why most of the single women are all meesed up in the head. the smart ones like shell are in long term relationships cause they know what its all about.

find a good woman who has brains can cook and look after a house a man and kids and doesn't always say no and mate you are in heaven.

believe me I'm talking from experiance you don't need to go looking for some one else.

the best thing is you have someone to share your life your dreams and your reality with.

cheers

meggala

Guest 33GTS25

alright alright, i too am very happy with my relationship:

my girl cleans, does my BAS and plays taxi when i occasionally go drinking.

i must say that i would never ask her to cook, did it once, have regretted it ever since

she's great even if my friends have nicknamed her "rod's electronic speed limiter"

typical scenario:

me,

in pilots seat, coming to roundabout, double clutches, shifts back to second and guns it, BWAAAAHHH

her, WHACK

me,

slows down and rubs side of head looking for panadol and searching for next busstop to deposit co-driver

:?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
    • That's my life. Past-Duncan has a lot to answer for
×
×
  • Create New...