Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Sorry everyone about this rant but just wanted oppinions on basic driving/merging.

last night almost got into a accident as i was driving on the freeway. i was in the left lane driving at about 95km had a car on the right of me slowly over taking me in the middle lane. comimg up to the on ramp saw car merging couldn't change lanes as had a car next to me. the car merged in front of me with about 15meters from me. noticed that i was approaching her really really fast, breaked hard and then changed lanes to the middle, she must of merged into traffic at about 60 to 70km i mean WTF could off crashed and at 95km that would of been bad.

has anyone else been in this situation?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/326087-opposite-to-speeding/
Share on other sites

yeh happens all the time

u shoudn't be in the left lane when a merge is coming up.

yes she should merge in line with signposted speed signs but you should plan further ahead.

do what i do sit in the right riding ppls ass so the move :)

Yeah staying in the right lane when a merge is coming up is what I do also.

If I happen to be in the left lane, whoever is in front if speeds are similiar as the merging lane approaches should take pole position :) basic etiquette in my opinion.

What I hate is when you're getting onto the freeway and the car infront of you on the on ramp is doing 70. I normally sit in the right or centre lane of the freeway when im going along.

Yep yep i've had that happen to me too. but i just love it how when i over took her in the middle lane and looked at her she had no idea what just happened and how close she was from an accident.

comimg up to the on ramp saw car merging couldn't change lanes as had a car next to me. the car merged in front of me with about 15meters from me.

Wouldn't you have noticed you were approaching the car on the onramp faster than normal as they were going slow and adjusted your speed accordingly as she merged infront of you? I'm all about sitting beside people who can't merge at the right speed to make their lives hard, but if you almost run into them when they do merge perhaps u need to pay more attention :)

Let me add to this:

I hate assholes who ignore the banked up turning lane, drive all the way to the front then push their way in at the start of the turning lane. I hate idiots who let them in even more.

Lol, sometimes i do let them in. =X

Let me add to this:

I hate assholes who ignore the banked up turning lane, drive all the way to the front then push their way in at the start of the turning lane. I hate idiots who let them in even more.

+1

Same goes for the 'closed lane' inbound on the Monash... there's signs telling drivers to merge left for 2KM... yet so many people insist on sticking in the lane until right where the lane ends (i.e. there's bollards and a sign in the middle of the lane!) and then trying to merge (usually with no indicator :verymad:). This disrupts the flow even more than usual, and probably only gets them a handful of cars ahead (As they've gotta try and merge into almost-stopped traffic, instead of just slotting into the flow).

You know what GD2ILA? Everyday I ask myself "Why are there so many f$%@ heads?!" A lot of the time it has to do with merging. I cannot think any further to find a reason why they would act that way. It baffles me.

I have no better conclusion. Peace.

The person merging is in the wrong as they must give way or match speed to avoid slowing down freeway traffic.

In saying that, it doesn't matter who is right or wrong if an accident is caused as it affects all parties concerned.

I'm pretty wary of merging cars as you also were, and in that scenario I slow right down and slip in behind the car on my right. Alternatively if there is no space because of other cars I will accelerate enough to clear the slowass merging driver. If I get pulled over I would simply explain that an accident was imminent if I had not of taken such evasive action; this is a perfectly acceptable defence in court.

i have no idea why but i tend to have people who are driving next to me just start changing lanes and neally push me off the road - happened twice on the eastern freeway in last few months - honestly makes me wonder if people are even paying the slightest bit of attention while driving sometimes.. :verymad:

i have no idea why but i tend to have people who are driving next to me just start changing lanes and neally push me off the road - happened twice on the eastern freeway in last few months - honestly makes me wonder if people are even paying the slightest bit of attention while driving sometimes.. :P

I've also had this happen to me too, really i honestly reckon they just go and not do a head check first. also have seen 2 cars change lane into the same lane and at last second 1 of then notice the other car and quickly swerves back into their lane :cool: . everyday i see a close call where a accident almost happens. only thing i can say is be extra careful and make sure you have insurance :verymad: .

Speed limit is there for a reason! i hate idiots who just put along 10k under the limit and your stuck behind them and people nearly run up your ass,

and dickheads who sit on the right hand lane of freeways doing 90 or something and your up their ass for them to get the F out of the lane and they dont!!! PRICKS

with all these other drivers with either incompetent skill to merge at 100km/h or have incompetent cars to accelerate quick enough to match the speed, even at speed limit 100 you almost had a crash.

imagine the proposed 140 increase of speed limit on the freeway... what would happen if you're on the left lane doing 135 (under the proposed limit) with another car on the right passing you at 140 so you can't change lane, and that same incompetent driver merges in front of you only doing 60-70?

you might actually had a crash already cos you may not have enough space to slow down from 140 to 60 in time...

unfortunately until these kinds of drivers are ironed out to increase their skill to do 140 on the freeway, I dont see how the proposed speed limit increase would ever, ever happened during our lifetime....

I've actually had one idiot STOP in front of me on an on-ramp because there was a car coming down the freeway behind , despite there was a separate lane to get up to speed before merging was necessary.

happens all the time. hate these idiots who can't drive.

at least on the freeway you can use up the breakdown/emergency lane.

the outbound ramp to kings way near crown is the worst, u get 50 metres to merge in. As i was accelerating up to 60kmh to match the traffic speed the idiot infront of me brakes to a complete stop. Made me brake so hard and we were both stuck there till a massive gap in traffic came.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...