Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

I'm looking at purchasing a Haltech Platinum Pro plugin ECU for my R33 gtr and i'd like to obtain clarification whether the ECU will support the factory AFM's or totally rely on the MAP sensors. I vaguely recall reading that it can support both but i'd like to find out for certain.

In this respect, does the ECU operate or perform better under a particular setup e.g performance/economy wise? I realise this may trigger a wide debate but it would be good to obtain people's experiences and setups relating to this ECU.

Thanks,

Adrian

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/328670-haltech-platinum-pro/
Share on other sites

I think i may have found the answer to this from haltechs site

"Supports R32 GT-R twin MAF sensors" and " Selectable onboard internal MAP sensor rated to 150kPa (up to 1.5 Bar or 22psi boost)"

So i take it will support the twin afm's. Does anyone recommend the AFM approach over the MAP setup? Im generally looking at keeping the factory airbox thats why im keen on checking if its the preferred approach.

Thanks

An ECU is only as good as the person tuning it. Talk to your tuner and see what ECU/sensor setup they recommend.

The Platinum pro does support twin AFM's, it also has the option of an internal or external MAP sensor.

I have one in my R33 GTR, using the onboard MAP sensor, cold starts are great, idles perfectly, power wise its making 320kws on a run in tune, not sure on fuel economy as I've only put a few hundred kms on it since the run in.

Cheers,

Johno

Many thanks guys, this is exactly the type of information i was after. I should really get in contact with my tuner and Haltech direct.

Johno, you mention the internal MAP is working well in your setup. I'd be looking at a similar power figure (is that with the N1's?), but basically what i take from their site is the onboard unit would be efficient to 22psi. I think that is more than adequate on a standard internal engine. Obviously pushing more you would need to revert to the optional MAP sensor.

I think i also have read that the ECU supports two ignition/fuel maps, making it possible to switch between two tunes?

Cheers

Adrian

No probs, Its working quite well. I will be swapping over to external map shortly and turning up the boost. That's correct 2.5 Bar internal is supported. Im running 2530's but N1's (GTSS or -7's) will get you into that power range with a bit more response.

Yep, you can load maps quite easily. I aim to have 2 maps done, one for street (98 octane & fuel economy lol) and one for E85 when its more consistent & readily available.

Cheers,

Johno

My thoughts exactly johno.

Switching between the two maps; is it as simple as loading up from the laptop? I doubt it would have some sort of an external switch that would allow this, though it would be ideal!

In regards to knock control, i couldn't see anywhere in the spec's whether the unit responds to knock by say reducing power or rev's?

Cheers for the responses they have been helpful :)

You wil have to load via laptop for now.

Live Dual Mapping - Not yet, but I have been told its only a firmware update or 2 away, probably about 2-3 months.

The Pro series does full knock control, long term and short term trimming. It also does long term and short term Fuel control.

It will flash the engine check light each time a knock even occurs and even log it if you like.

  • 1 year later...

And without starting a new topic, are these plug and play into the rb25det series 2? They sound more functional than a power fc... Whats the price on one of these?

Auto tune mmmm. There is an auto tuner for power fc but I ain't have the gonads to try it out. All it needs to work is the wide band and some limits entered by the user. I think it should be an option, its nothing fancy really. Have the ecu know what car its on and let it load up some target afr's and start adjusting til they are met from the wideband feedback. After fueling, give timing until a threshold of knock is heard. Then the user can go over it to adjust anything if necessary.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...