Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

was for that tuner style magazine photo shoot Michael posted up a while ago, so was free was swapping time etc

but the guy that took the pics of my car will charge about $150 for a shoot

haha thanks man

Cant really see but its got that titanium tip on too, looks the goods

looks like my exhaust is it the kakimoto system you have?

6197706359_55c233af62_b.jpg

6197708261_f6e0a07368_b.jpg

IMG_1337.jpg

looks good moh. you should get the r34 front lip that some came with would look good. i did it on my old black r34 and finished it off made the front look better.

looks like my exhaust is it the kakimoto system you have?

looks good moh. you should get the r34 front lip that some came with would look good. i did it on my old black r34 and finished it off made the front look better.

nah apexi n1 evolution

had to buy a titanium muffler tip extender becuase was buring/staing my rear bar, works a treat though

you got Regu 06&R?

nah apexi n1 evolution

had to buy a titanium muffler tip extender becuase was buring/staing my rear bar, works a treat though

you got Regu 06&R?

ok cool, ive seen some exhausts on evo's that sit to close to the bumper and would burn it easily.

yeah i got the Regu 06&R on mine.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...