Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Not to be rude, but is that sarcasm? Looks shit house.

oh im so sorry internet master, i hope your comment has given you more internet power. you are a wise man because real estate agents are oh so trust worthy.

now thats sarcasm biatch!!!!

Shouldn't even be modding an m3, let alone uleh spec tail lights

as if you dont mod a M3 its not like a ferrari or anything that expensive. you should check out e46 fanatics forum there are some good looking M3's there. and since when is smoked tail lights uleh spec lol. they look better than the chrome style and the clear style.

Thank you Hamish. in person it doesnt look as dark as it does in the pic but i like it :) the only time it would be really expensive modding a M3 is if you want a supercharger or even exhausts for these are ridiculous prices. all ive done is csl style intake and csl front lip and csl rear diffuser. would love to get a set of BBS RS GT's though haha.

Not sure why ya got ya panties in a twist champ what I do for a living is irrelevant, don't you work in retail?

if you only want positive comments only show ya family photos otherwise you'll get honest opinions welcome to the Internet.

you have happily ruined an m3 good for you. At least nobody is gonna steal it cos they sure as shit wouldn't wanna be seen driving it

Now unrustle ya jimmies pick up the spilt milk and enjoy your car just like you were before we bagged it.

Not sure why ya got ya panties in a twist champ what I do for a living is irrelevant, don't you work in retail?

if you only want positive comments only show ya family photos otherwise you'll get honest opinions welcome to the Internet.

you have happily ruined an m3 good for you. At least nobody is gonna steal it cos they sure as shit wouldn't wanna be seen driving it

Now unrustle ya jimmies pick up the spilt milk and enjoy your car just like you were before we bagged it.

would love to see you talk like this in person with absolute disrespect towards someone else. the only thing that ticked me off is how you go about speaking on here. all you had to say was something like 'not much of a fan of the taillights' or something along those lines but no you gotta sound tougher than that because its the internet. so what your saying is just because of the tail lights no body in the world likes it because you said so?

would love to see you talk like this in person with absolute disrespect towards someone else. the only thing that ticked me off is how you go about speaking on here. all you had to say was something like 'not much of a fan of the taillights' or something along those lines but no you gotta sound tougher than that because its the internet. so what your saying is just because of the tail lights no body in the world likes it because you said so?

Alex would say it to your face, I would too, IMO it looks shit and you need to remove the commodore-spec Night shades.

83f.jpg

would love to see you talk like this in person with absolute disrespect towards someone else. the only thing that ticked me off is how you go about speaking on here. all you had to say was something like 'not much of a fan of the taillights' or something along those lines but no you gotta sound tougher than that because its the internet. so what your saying is just because of the tail lights no body in the world likes it because you said so?

You really like to make a mountain out of a mole hill right? Am I supposed to be intimidated by you? Are we gonna have a fight over your tail lights? LOL I had heaps of negative comments on my cars not a single fk was given cos you know my car my money my taste

I'd never tint tail lights on any car & deffs not an e46 m3 one of the toughest cars of all time lower it a little some big fat wheels sure that's all they need

in no way was my comment intimidation and in no way am i starting a fight. and they haven't been tinted like that stuff you get in a spray can. they are complete tail lights, although im thinking of upgrading them to the led style that came on them from i think 2004 onwards. ill chuck up some pics of the front and that in a minute.

as if you dont mod a M3 its not like a ferrari or anything that expensive. you should check out e46 fanatics forum there are some good looking M3's there. and since when is smoked tail lights uleh spec lol. they look better than the chrome style and the clear style.

Well that's true. My mate has the gold e46 m3. But I think the car looked a lot cleaner when they are stock. And personally am not a fan of tints.. Makes a great car look cheap, it's all IMO anyway

LEDs will be a pro upgrade there is a place in Clayton I think it is has cheap taillights etc non genuine though.. Otherwise get em from o/s save a fortune

thats exactly the place ill be getting them from, they are called mars performance.

LEDs will be a pro upgrade there is a place in Clayton I think it is has cheap taillights etc non genuine though.. Otherwise get em from o/s save a fortune

http://marsperformance.com.au/

hmmmm i shall see what they look like in person as the guy told me he has a couple bmw's with both fitted. he must do alright because i had a mate go there to get a new front bumper for his e36 and the guy has a c63 AMG in matte black.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...