Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I was flicking through an old issue of Zoom Magazine yesterday and I came across an article on Airflow meters. This particular mod described was for the R32 GTS-T. My question is, will it work on the R33 as well? Or has anyone had any success with it? OR even tried it?

This is it:

The calibration of the airflow meter can be changed by altering it's internal flow volume. Anything you do to the meter to make it flow more air will lean the air/fuel mixtures and add more ignition timing, while restricting the airflow meter will add fuel and retard timing. In the case of most Nissans that run overly rich in standard form, a simple and effective modification is to flick the wire mesh screens out from the meter with a screwdriver. The resulting change in flow area (the wire reduces the flow capability of the meter by at least 5%) adds a couple of degrees more timing and will lean the full load mistures by about half a ratio. Thats good for 3kW - 4kW at the rear wheels of a stock R32 GTSt.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/33039-air-flow-meter-mod/
Share on other sites

gtstii How is it posibly there to "strighten out the airflow" - The air comes in and enters a cylinder its only going to go one way and bend a little around the wire.

Its only there to stop ppl with no idea of how to control there hands puting a screw driver throuhg it (or catch somthing that gets throuhg a cheap filter - why you would be using a cheap filter on a skyline i dont know)

the mesh will form a bit of a restriction, but that's its job as i understand. It is there to ensure that the airflow is evenly spread over the area of the AFM.

The hot wire element doesn't sense the airflow over the whole area of the AFM pipe so it reads it at the centre and i guess assumes this flow is even over the pipes area.

removing it may cause less of a restriction and give you maybe 1 - 2rwkw, but in the long run, i think you A/F ratio's will be less stable due to fluctuations in the AFM's ability to measure air coming into the engine.

make sense?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...