Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I was flicking through an old issue of Zoom Magazine yesterday and I came across an article on Airflow meters. This particular mod described was for the R32 GTS-T. My question is, will it work on the R33 as well? Or has anyone had any success with it? OR even tried it?

This is it:

The calibration of the airflow meter can be changed by altering it's internal flow volume. Anything you do to the meter to make it flow more air will lean the air/fuel mixtures and add more ignition timing, while restricting the airflow meter will add fuel and retard timing. In the case of most Nissans that run overly rich in standard form, a simple and effective modification is to flick the wire mesh screens out from the meter with a screwdriver. The resulting change in flow area (the wire reduces the flow capability of the meter by at least 5%) adds a couple of degrees more timing and will lean the full load mistures by about half a ratio. Thats good for 3kW - 4kW at the rear wheels of a stock R32 GTSt.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/33039-air-flow-meter-mod/
Share on other sites

gtstii How is it posibly there to "strighten out the airflow" - The air comes in and enters a cylinder its only going to go one way and bend a little around the wire.

Its only there to stop ppl with no idea of how to control there hands puting a screw driver throuhg it (or catch somthing that gets throuhg a cheap filter - why you would be using a cheap filter on a skyline i dont know)

the mesh will form a bit of a restriction, but that's its job as i understand. It is there to ensure that the airflow is evenly spread over the area of the AFM.

The hot wire element doesn't sense the airflow over the whole area of the AFM pipe so it reads it at the centre and i guess assumes this flow is even over the pipes area.

removing it may cause less of a restriction and give you maybe 1 - 2rwkw, but in the long run, i think you A/F ratio's will be less stable due to fluctuations in the AFM's ability to measure air coming into the engine.

make sense?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • To plug the hole. The engine plant may not have known whether the car it was going into had a gauge or not. It was a long time ago and the integrations might not have been fully modern. Or they might not have cared because the extra inventory and processes to save a few cents on the sender might have cost more anyway. But please tell me you are not still confusing the idea of a pressure gauge sender, and an oil pressure light switch. The switch will be out there. In a separate hole. Probably with only one wire running to it. Running the light.
    • Blower needs to go low on the exhaust side, displacing the AC and PS, which you have to decide whether you want to keep and how and where to relocate if you do. Electric option for PS is, at least, helpful. Sadly, there is no workable 12V electric AC of any value. Whilst the blower is the last compression step before the throttle, and so it might seem a good idea to have it near the inlet manifold (as mentioned above), you probably want it to go through an intercooler first, so, having it on the opposite side of the car facilitates that air flow path. The turbo discharges into the blower, so proximity of the turbo's compressor outlet to the blower's inlet is nice. But then you might want to intercool that too, before boosting it again....which would probably be a ball ache. Routing pipes out to the front and back could be a bit shit. If there was room for (at least) a small (but preferably larger) water to air core on that side, then that would probably be the best approach. I guess a reasonable alternative would be to locate the blower where the alternator is (more or less, associated with the inlet manifold, per Matt's thought), and somehow incorporate a water to air core into the manifold, sort of like they do for modern blown V8s. The big difference here though is that those V8s have only the one throttle (upstream the blower) and only the one compression step (the blower) and no need for too much in the way of bypass/blowoff valves. Whereas in a twin charged 6, you do need to think about one or two bypass valves associated with the 2 compressors and you would prefer to have the intercooling done before the air has to pass through the throttle. You'd like the throttle to work approx the same no matter what the compression is doing. But if it is located in hot air stream before a cooler, then sometimes the air will be real hot, sometimes it will be quite cool, and the throttle mapping/response will be quite different between those two cases. The throttle, if sized for hot air, would be too large for cold conditions. It's all a ball ache.
    • Package SC on exhaust side. Remote mount turbo. Still a fair bit of room when you get creative on the inlet side of the motor too. Especially if you can get really creative with the welding, and effectively build it into the bottom of the inlet manifold. Would definitely take some design work, and some trial and error, to make sure flow works well still! Might be easier to just start with the Nissan March though... All the work is already done for you...
    • I'll sit down and get a post together 😁
    • The factory oil pressure sender is no longer in the car that's what is confusing me. In the Taarks adapter I have an aftermarket Bosch style pressure/temp sender and the factory temp sender only. Oil pressure is perfect. Where does the factory oil temp sender go to if there were never any gauges? Why was it there from the factory?
×
×
  • Create New...