Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Previously there was only one outlet selling E85 thus nearly impossible to use but according to this article there will be quite a few more.

http://www.thegovmonitor.com/economy/victoria-rolls-out-new-high-blend-ethanol-fuel-36435.html

"Oil company Caltex has announced the roll-out of up to 100 E85 petrol outlets over the next 12 months -- but only a handful of new cars will be able to run on the fuel."

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I'll believe it when I see it, a couple of places have been telling us they'll be getting it for years now. Will definitely make the switch when it comes through though.

Yes I agree but I can confirm this place now has E85

Fueltown

1150 Nepean Highway

Highett (opposite Southland Shopping

Centre)

And reportedly there is 30 Caltex stations that already have E85 available by July 1, 2010

Need one within 15km of where I live or work to justify the switch, cause right now Southland and the United in western suburbs are a bit far for me.

Yes I agree but I can confirm this place now has E85

Fueltown

1150 Nepean Highway

Highett (opposite Southland Shopping

Centre)

And reportedly there is 30 Caltex stations that already have E85 available by July 1, 2010

Fueltown has had it all year mate.

Bit behind the times :laugh:

Works out about the same cost as running your car on a 98 octane fuel as it costs 1/3 less (at the moment) but you use 4/3 compared with non-ethanol petrol...hence the need for bigger fuel delivery system. More than a few threads on here about how to install and what's required.

Birds hopefully soon it will be, the article above says E85 will be available at 30 Caltex stations in victoria will be available by July 1st 2010.

Caltex website states otherwise but only 2 months late

"Caltex will begin selling Bio E-Flex in Melbourne from September and will have Bio E-Flex available in over 30 service stations in Melbourne, Sydney, Brisbane, Adelaide and Canberra by the end of October, increasing to 100 metropolitan and regional locations in 2011."

http://www.caltex.com.au/LatestNews/Pages/...m.aspx?ID=13192

You will only need bigger fuel pump and bigger injectors if you cannot supply enough fuel depending on your setup you might or might not be able to.

Great fuel, works wonders with a tune and excessive boost but nobody seems to have unlocked its full potential. you require a very high compression N/A to utilise it fully, possibly as high as 19:1.

11 more Caltex servos coming out with E85, probably with the release of the new Holden as a marketing exercise. Should be this month.

http://www.caltex.com.au/ProductsAndServic...s/BioFuels.aspx

Great fuel, works wonders with a tune and excessive boost but nobody seems to have unlocked its full potential. you require a very high compression N/A to utilise it fully, possibly as high as 19:1.

I have read some info from the states which indicates maximum comp with 98 of roughly 12.5-13:1 compared with E85 14.5-15:1 for N/A. Race engines on race gas are running around 17:1.

Guys running E85 similarly with race gas and boost are still running lowish comps E85 is approximately 105Ron compared with 110Ron race gas.

Fueltown has had it all year mate.

Bit behind the times :laugh:

I don't live near there or go passed it much more than twice per year. Either way 2 stations with E85 isn't fesible for use by 99.99% of people.

The Caltex's and Holden's news is big as this will lead to E85 being available right across the state as other suppliers United Fuel Zone ect will most likely all start supplying E85 in many more locations.

When it is by the looks of things early next year I will be switching over to run E85.

Edited by frozenpod
I have read some info from the states which indicates maximum comp with 98 of roughly 12.5-13:1 compared with E85 14.5-15:1 for N/A. Race engines on race gas are running around 17:1.

Guys running E85 similarly with race gas and boost are still running lowish comps E85 is approximately 105Ron compared with 110Ron race gas.

You can get 108ron E85 for a little more, $3 a litre.

Those compression ratios are lower than the max limits though.

I don't live near there or go passed it much more than twice per year. Either way 2 stations with E85 isn't fesible for use by 99.99% of people.

The Caltex's and Holden's news is big as this will lead to E85 being available right across the state as other suppliers United Fuel Zone ect will most likely all start supplying E85 in many more locations.

When it is by the looks of things early next year I will be switching over to run E85.

It's been talked about in every E85 thread in this section & forum :laugh:

I've said it for a while now - 2011 before E85 is a realistically viable option. Still a good 6-8 months off yet.

Until then it's not really worth a look in.

Also E85 prices - SHOULD be cheaper than current bowser prices are charging anyway.

Hopefully it will bring about some competition... but then unlikely in the fuel industry where everyone prefers to conspire and keep it higher for no legit reason :/

It's been talked about in every E85 thread in this section & forum :laugh:

I've said it for a while now - 2011 before E85 is a realistically viable option. Still a good 6-8 months off yet.

Until then it's not really worth a look in.

Also E85 prices - SHOULD be cheaper than current bowser prices are charging anyway.

Hopefully it will bring about some competition... but then unlikely in the fuel industry where everyone prefers to conspire and keep it higher for no legit reason :/

The purpose of this thread was the article released 4 days ago which was new information and yes I agree that E85 is another 6-8 months away.

I heard about fuel zone 2 months ago but I was told it was locked up and not for use by the general public where as last week when I was there someone was filling up. From what I can gather this is realtively new again not the purpose of this thread. The price was $0.99.xx and regular unleaded was $1.22.9. It is likely to become much cheaper when it is mainstream.

just out of interest, what is the average price per litre for e85, and compared with fuel, does it burn more per 100km?

I get 350k's to a tank when I was getting 450 on 98 so it isn't good mileage but I wouldn't have bought a turbo if I was interested in saving fuel. You should get about 30% extra midrange power and torque if tuned well.

fueltown is locked but you just ask for the key.... to keep morons from putting it into any old car

the price is 99c @ fueltown and united

the fueltown stuff is 106 RON and the unoted stuff is 104 RON

the caltex stuff will vary from e70 - e85 for cold start purposes (ghey)

the cost is the same as pulp but you need to fill up more often and for long cruises you need to run pulp or take jerry's

you will need an aftermarket ecu and a full tune to run it

fueltown is locked but you just ask for the key.... to keep morons from putting it into any old car

the price is 99c @ fueltown and united

the fueltown stuff is 106 RON and the unoted stuff is 104 RON

the caltex stuff will vary from e70 - e85 for cold start purposes (ghey)

the cost is the same as pulp but you need to fill up more often and for long cruises you need to run pulp or take jerry's

you will need an aftermarket ecu and a full tune to run it

There are a lot of cars in the US running 30% bigger injectors and or using a fuel reg to adjust while watching a wideband, seems like an easy way to get it to run but you wouldn't get the power a full tune would give. Seems most owners are modifying their cars to run it due to the lower price and green nature, not the extra go you get.

I was at Fueltown waiting for the pump and saw a guy yanking on the nozzle, took him a while to work out it had a padlock on it. >_< I wonder if Caltex will lock theirs?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...