Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

There is a huge amount of fruit on that car! :P

If you do buy it, (and I'd be tempted, even at my age - lol), I wouldn't be hanging around KFC/KK/McD at night & I'd dye my hair grey.

I'd ask the G/F how to apply wrinkles as make-up.

In fact, I'd be so paranoid about taking the thing out at night. Defect stations would have a field-day!

It's not really that bad, some stupid cops wouldn't even no what they are looking at. DVS32R had a similar setup on his last gtr.... Cop pulled him over... Asked him to pop the hood... Than asked.... Is it turbo??

And there was a highmount T04Z sitting right infront of him....

But a defect station is a diffrent story. I say for the price and the bits on it.... Go for it!!!

Hell yea, if your really worried about it, but it, buy some -5s, and all the gear to convert it back to Twin... Wouldn't cost much the engine is already built. Or just plumb the screamer in, cover the pods with a airbox.... The rest don't worrie about till u have to... If u ever do that is. Ifi was after a built GTR that's the one I'd be buying for that price.

Hell yea, if your really worried about it, but it, buy some -5s, and all the gear to convert it back to Twin... Wouldn't cost much the engine is already built. Or just plumb the screamer in, cover the pods with a airbox.... The rest don't worrie about till u have to... If u ever do that is. Ifi was after a built GTR that's the one I'd be buying for that price.

^^^ hehe...

And if you don't buy it, PM me, so I can get on the queue as #2 :yes:

(I'd love 1x for the R32 GT-R Anniv)

haha cheers, yeah i got done for excessive noise once but they still didnt find the screamer. i will plumb it bak if i get in trouble but def want a high mount cos they alot easier to work on. + i live in qld, cops are not as vicious here.

depends on where you live as to wether you'll have problems. in vic all you need is a dodgy roadworthy and your set. the vicroads guy/girl comes out and checks the vin on the roady against the car, and bam, your registered.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...