Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys,

i am putting together a rb25 just for street use.

At the moment my current setup on my current motor is

3071R

plasmaman

6 boost manifold

all supporting mods exhaust, fmic, injectors, pump, vipec. etc

I have got another Rb 25 that i am about looking at assembling,

its only done 70 thousand kms, i've pulled it apart and all bearings, rings, piston clearances are within factory tolerances.

i am looking at freshening it up with:

Genuine nissan headgasket

genuine nissan bearings, mains, thrust and big end bushes.

Cosworth Forged pistons (standard bore size)

re-using standard head bolts and rod bolts.

I'm going to upgrade my 3071R to a 3076R,

looking to push about 300 rwkw. and still maintain drivability and a reliable motor.

anything else that you guys recommend while i have got the engine apart?

i'm not sure what kind of psi is needed to get to 300rwkw, but i believe the standard headgasket and head bolts are up to the job.

Are forged pistons overkill for the job? i don't mind using standard pistons.

if there is anything else that would be a good idea to do while the engine is apart. ive searched through the forums already, maybe there is something i have missed

cheers

From the reading I have done from people and there results and how theve built it I would say the idea you got going at the moment is right for the 300kw mark and personally I would upgrade the pistons and the headbolts just for peice of mind.

To run 300 you would probably be running 19-20 psi with the 3076 so in regards to head gasket I would probably go for something aftermarket as most I have read are running about 18psi with standard one. I am no expert in the department as have not built my own motor but thats just what ive gathered in my research.

its probably a good preventative measure to replace them with arp head studs,

Standard head bolts look to be Sturdy and high quality tho.

Ive looked into an mls head gasket, i'm undecided as i don't really want to get the block decked just to put one on.

anyone else put a mls headgasket on without decking the block and giving a quick clean up with a wizzer and some flap wheels?

i just wasn;t to sure how tolerant they were compared to standard style headgaskets.

hey mate im building mine now slowly and aiming for simular figures. was only 85 for big end studs and head bolts 250 from memory. worth investing in anyway. wouldnt worry about stock headgasket unless stock boost. i went king bearings but nissan ones are good

as for the comment about getting block decked its not really that expensive unless you dont want to strip it right down. but if its out go 4 it. was quoted $260 for bore out 20 thou and hone. $82 to acid bath crank and polish. $82 to deck/mill block and acid bath. ended up getting that all for $250 mates rates but you never know if its been hot before and warped etc

hey mate im building mine now slowly and aiming for simular figures. was only 85 for big end studs and head bolts 250 from memory. worth investing in anyway. wouldnt worry about stock headgasket unless stock boost. i went king bearings but nissan ones are good

as for the comment about getting block decked its not really that expensive unless you dont want to strip it right down. but if its out go 4 it. was quoted $260 for bore out 20 thou and hone. $82 to acid bath crank and polish. $82 to deck/mill block and acid bath. ended up getting that all for $250 mates rates but you never know if its been hot before and warped etc

machining is cheap, i thought i was having a good run on the stock head gasket atm seems to be good on my current standard motor @20+ psi

Do it once, do it right. Don't re-use the factory head bolts, rod bolts or the factory pistons.

I will prob go the rod bolts aswell as a the arp head bolts. Standard Rods look quite robust.

put a crank collar on,i wish i had now im taking the motor out again to do it.

With this crank collar. i take it the factory crank collar only goes iunto the pump drive 5 mm or so. aftermarket collars go into the oil pump 12mm(?). so less chance of slip or braking

do you have to rebalance the crank with this new crank collar? still fine to use the factory oil pump with the upgraded crank collar?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...