Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi!

I´m interested to know if you guys have advanced technical know how about the Group a cars that was such a success in the 90 s. Its more and more popular to build a nice time attack car, and the "top secret" know how maybee not so top secret anymore??

I think it would be very nice to know more about hardcore technical solutions, data about suspension alighments, CG, RC, scrub, spring hardness, swaybars and so on, all this information would be alot help to people today trying to show the world about the GTRs splended performance.

i´m also interested in engine tech, such as the swing oil pickup in the wet sump and so on, all this Group a candy.. :P

I know there is a group a thread but its mostly just alot of talk about anything group a.

/Lofa

Edited by loffe
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/335709-group-a-technical-specs-r32/
Share on other sites

There was more than spring rates and swaybars mate.

There were underbody chassis mods and all sorts of business far as i am aware (as there certainly was with HR31's) :P

Not saying the Group A's weren't fast in their day, but given the technology and advancements of today, i cannot see why you couldn't realistically do a better job.

Tech has certainly moved on since then, and they of course were built to Group A rules, so I don't know why anyone would want to stiffle their build by replicating the specifications of them.

You could PM "Jetwreck" to request some specs and settings on the Group A GTR he is involved with.

while the cars were amazing in the day...things have come a long way in 20 years.

the group a cars had custom hubs and control arms for a start....very little was standard.

I have seen the alignment specs and they were not far from what most people would already choose. eg not a heap of camber or toe out. remember they were pretty heavy and tyres were not huge.

Be interested to see engine spec. From what i can find on the net about j- groupa was that they were limited to 500ps. And std displacment. Did they just run n1 turbos?

bit more HP than that(the GIO car dyno'd recently at 360AWKW's on 1.5bar).....they also chased torque more that HP with them.

How was the response like compared to say a set of -9's which are around the ballpark for that power?

You could say -5's but they are closer to 400 @ the tyres.

:P ....wtf are you talking about!.....lol

sorry man you lost me...elaborate please!

:P ....wtf are you talking about!.....lol

sorry man you lost me...elaborate please!

Garrett bolt on replacemt turbos (2860's), new tech stuff :)

Was wondering how they compared response wise. Obviously they would be better given 15 years of dev.

But just how much, and more importantly how do the torque curves differ

Even get the two cars onto the dyno same day just to see it all.

Would be an interesting comparison IMO, results could surprise everyone :)

Garrett bolt on replacemt turbos (2860's), new tech stuff :)

Was wondering how they compared response wise. Obviously they would be better given 15 years of dev.

But just how much, and more importantly how do the torque curves differ

Even get the two cars onto the dyno same day just to see it all.

Would be an interesting comparison IMO, results could surprise everyone :P

oh....I get yah now....remember I'm only a "Spacer".

The turbo's on the motor came with the motor.....when we rebuild the ones on the current motor I'll let you know what's in em....oh and we wont be changing the spec....no need they do the job pretty effectively!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Actually everyone on the roads was really well behaved. The only person that did any minor tailgating was a local hoon in a Turbo Focus. Unfortunately we weren't going the same way so there was no grand initial D touge battle. Lots of people pulled over and let me through. The amount of "Hey man nice car, omg skyline, nice 34 man woo" was suprising. Like really suprising. Like almost annoying. My partner was obviously surprised, she'd never seen anyone in the real world point out the car/like the car/want to chat about the car before, so to have like 3 people per day mention it was notable, I could finally say SEE? SOMEONE THINKS THEY'RE COOL. Everyone was also pretty suprised about the weather. Every day was dry and about ~13-14C. Mount Wellington had a sign that said they close the gates at 9pm and I was heading up there at about ~7:30. It was VERY apparent that conditions were getting significantly worse by the minute on the way up and down. The road on the mountain was terrible though, it's no driving road. I have various suspension related questions now. Luckily it was only about 20 minutes from where we were staying to the top of the mountain as said Google maps. We only had the 2 nights in Hobart. We went to the Farm Gate Market though which was really good - And went down to the Hastings Thermal springs/caves down there during the day. I'd definitely be up for going back again, so luckily there's a few more sights yet to see. Didn't get to do the west coast/queenstown/cradle mountain so this was supposed to be a 'scouting' trip anyway of sorts if I were to one day do/take part in/organize a more car-focused trip. As for the boat, it wasn't bad. Well it was bad, but not in the way you're thinking. We did the night trip which leaves at 6:45 (though you have to be there ~2 hours earlier) and arrives the next morning at about 6am. There is nothing to do on the ship. If you plan accordingly and bring a book/tablet/show to watch/charger you can just chill out, take some Travacalm and just sleep through it. The food there is an extremely basic buffet that costs $32 a plate, or $14 for a $3 pizza. The way back we had a travel kettle and a few different types of cup noodles and made our own tea/coffee in the room. This was a far superior way to do it. At the very least book one of the rooms with beds. I guess as we were in the off season we didn't have room mates. You get an option for rooms with 4 beds (2x bunks) or a room with just the two bottom beds. There's also some option for a deluxe queen bed but it's much pricer. We've been on sleeper trains in Asia before so we figured this is similar (and it was)
    • You just gotta be really, really, really clear and decisive with what you want your end product to be. 99% of people who want this conversion aren't "I want to run a 295 front tyre!" so they don't really need the widebody. They just want the OEM body to look a little less dumpy, so bonnet, bar, skirts job done with some camber, stretch, slam. It's when you want that, but then decide to pivot later you get big problems. See also if you're willing to get an all in one fibreglass bar, and you're willing to accept fibreglass problems like cracking the entire item on a driveway, instead of just a piece attached to the bottom, etc etc etc. Decide this all before buyin'.
    • After @Kinkstaah debacle, I'd never want to try and get it right 😛
    • The hood lines up with the fenders. The front bar doesn't perfectly line up with the fenders where the wheel arch is. You have to 'squeeze' the front bar 'in' as it wants to naturally flare out and be longer on the sides. There's a few threads where people notice this when they only swap a GTR style bumper and front bar. Unless you have genuine OEM items - you may be better served getting conversion kits. There are GTT bumpers to fit GTR hoods. There are GTR hoods (non genuine) to fit the GTT bracketry. MAY  
×
×
  • Create New...