Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

ahhh...... yeah....... read his post? you just said the exact same thing essentially

deh was being sarcastic, here if you dont know the definition :P

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarcasm

Edited by bti_jet

......oookkk

if your post was sarcastic it would essentially imply the opposite of what is observed; which in your case and Charle's case, the posts themselves are pretty much how it is, hence, they're a fairly accurate observation. sarcasm that does not make.

better luck next time

and to the OP, yes you may use my pics

......oookkk

if your post was sarcastic it would essentially imply the opposite of what is observed; which in your case and Charle's case, the posts themselves are pretty much how it is, hence, they're a fairly accurate observation. sarcasm that does not make.

better luck next time

and to the OP, yes you may use my pics

haha.. so much debate guys.

thank you for the use of pics mate :P

......oookkk

if your post was sarcastic it would essentially imply the opposite of what is observed; which in your case and Charle's case, the posts themselves are pretty much how it is, hence, they're a fairly accurate observation. sarcasm that does not make.

better luck next time

and to the OP, yes you may use my pics

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

  • 2 weeks later...
that car is sooooo shiny, i wonder what the owner does to keep it looking so stuntastic :P

I think everyone spooge's on it as he drives it so he's constantly buffing it out..

Would you be able to post some pics of original items?

[/quote

as requested; front bar is sold , sorry bout not being able to get full pics of rear bar as car is in storage atm. these are the actual items for sale

post-60118-1287025384_thumb.jpg

post-60118-1287025392_thumb.jpg

post-60118-1287025403_thumb.jpg

Edited by rexrxr
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...