Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

from what I've read to keep the pistons cool, the quicker than move about the more friction & heat it will cause right?

richening up the tune up the top will keep the pistons/rings/ring lands in tack but this sacrifices power output.

and from what toshi has said before and after cat, yes there is a difference, I've had my car on a dyno and the A/Fs were different to what my wideband was reading (pre cat).

Most tuners are save time/money by tuning at the exhaust tip, but I don't believe that's the best way to do it.

I personally have pumped in extra timing after MBT, for my old setup it was around 5600rpm, and the timing for row 17 read something like

Row vs Timing 10/13 11/13 12/13 14/13 15/14 16/14 17/15 18/11 19/11 20/11

did you heck this on a dyno to see if it made an improvement?

im puttin my car on the rollers tonight to see how my street tuning is going, ill try add some timing after MBT and will also richen it up slightly there too.

ill post my results later

I always ask for AFR 11.5 when I go to get a tune. It always comes out at 12.0 or higher. No idea why tuners insist on running leaner for a few percent power and end up with higher temps if you ever use it on the track or highway.

everyone has their different opinions. your workshop might think you've read something on the net and just because of that insist on 11.5. so they ignore you and go with what they think is best.

i'll be doing a little experimenting with afr's and timing when i get my car going. mainly gonna try using a little extra fuel in cells that occasionally knock, but not enough to drop a full degree of timing

(Well the aussies general rule is to tune rbs to a full load afr of 12 and then tweak ign timing to suit for max power where as the japs throw in a shit load of fuel eg 10.5-10.0(keeping in mind that their pump is 100+) and then throw in a shit load of timing on top of that..)

one might say your question is, do you want a sas tune or a crd tune. both very good but both very differant.

what the main reason behind richening it up after what i assume is peak torque?

im guessing just to cool it down a little?

do you add more timing in during the enrichment after 6500RPM

this rb25 has a very big turbo and stock head. it does not make decent power untill around 6k. thats why its like that. to keep it cool when its on heat.

and from what toshi has said before and after cat, yes there is a difference, I've had my car on a dyno and the A/Fs were different to what my wideband was reading (pre cat).

Yes because your $300 wide band is just as good as the Autronic Wide Bands they use on Dyno's. That makes this test very accurate and relevant.

Had a look the other day at one of our "better" tuners on a stock turboed Rb26, 1bar and pfc

From the word go ie. low rpm coming into boost he set afrs to 10.8 to 10.9 all the to limiter...when asked why he said it makes more torque that way

Is it that he is just playing it safe or is he just plain lazy to tweak the timing from the off to on boost transition, from which i understand is a little tricky to get perfect in that area???

At the end of the day it made 360rwhp(dynojet), knock was no higher than 20 and this is on 95 ron

Guilt toy mentioned richen it up on top because of the shit fuel.....u guys would not have a problem as u run 98 but we here with our best being 95 i think the only other way to add some knock resistance it to richen it up a bit....we have an excuse....still not sure about the japs :thumbsup:

I see if a can get the tune for u guys to have a look

Edited by Don Dada
Guilt toy mentioned richen it up on top because of the shit fuel.....u guys would not have a problem as u run 98 but we here with our best being 95 i think the only other way to add some knock resistance it to richen it up a bit....we have an excuse....still not sure about the japs :thumbsup:
They did design and build the cars and have many very fast RB's!!!
where are you exactly? as 95 in the US is the same as 98 in Oz

Nah....not in the US

Our 95 is shit....although running it with the base pfc map at 11psi on the 26 still not produce more than 25-30 knock...Strange!?!

Edited by Don Dada

maybe it is equiv to our 98

ours are labelled RON, US is labelled (RON+MON)/2 i believe.

RON is more of a controlled test rating, whereas MON is tested in more 'real world' conditions i guess you could say.

so what country are you in?

where i am there is no liablility. so the guys working / own the fuel stations can chuck in 100 litres of water into the 98 octane tank to make some extra bucks blow up 200 cars and get away with it without having to pay a cent! if you asked for money they would just laugh at you.

I get soo paranoid that I listen to my engine with k-mon when i change fuel stations just in case they are doing the dodge.

where i am there is no liablility. so the guys working / own the fuel stations can chuck in 100 litres of water into the 98 octane tank to make some extra bucks blow up 200 cars and get away with it without having to pay a cent! if you asked for money they would just laugh at you.

lol you do realise that they get randomly audited for things like that.

LOL my bad, I'm surprised you don't end up with kerosene in your tank half the time!

who knows what they put in there, but there is one fuel station that sells good fuel here, and it has a very very very strong smell.. even stronger then race fuels i have seen.. do not know what additives they are putting inside it.

who knows what they put in there, but there is one fuel station that sells good fuel here, and it has a very very very strong smell.. even stronger then race fuels i have seen.. do not know what additives they are putting inside it.

Uranium? :P

maybe it is equiv to our 98

ours are labelled RON, US is labelled (RON+MON)/2 i believe.

RON is more of a controlled test rating, whereas MON is tested in more 'real world' conditions i guess you could say.

so what country are you in?

Yeh i know the difference.....Definitely 95 ron and i'm as far as u can go south on the Caribbean chain :D

We got some fast shit here too....stuff from Trial, Signal etc and some good local projects too....but they dont seem to last very long >_<

Yeh i know the difference.....Definitely 95 ron and i'm as far as u can go south on the Caribbean chain :D

We got some fast shit here too....stuff from Trial, Signal etc and some good local projects too....but they dont seem to last very long >_<

i seen a few import when i was in the carribean a few weeks back.

i seen a few import when i was in the carribean a few weeks back.

I get soooo exited everytime I see a 'tuned' import in Sint'Maartin, BVI's, St Kitts, Barbados, Trinidad, Jamaica etc... even the Dominican Rep.

My 5000hp MTU's just don't cut it in a big ass superyacht!

Ah man I missssss my GTR!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Or just put in a 1JZ, and sell me the NEO head 😎
    • Oh, it's been done. You just run a wire out there and back. But they have been known to do coolant temp sensors, MAP sensors, etc. They're not silly (at Regency Park) and know what's what with all the different cars.
    • Please ignore I found the right way of installing it thanks
    • There are advantages, and disadvantages to remapping the factory.   The factory runs billions of different maps, to account for sooooo many variables, especially when you bring in things like constantly variable cams etc. By remapping all those maps appropriately, you can get the car to drive so damn nicely, and very much so like it does from the factory. This means it can utilise a LOT of weird things in the maps, to alter how it drives in situations like cruise on a freeway, and how that will get your fuel economy right down.   I haven't seen an aftermarket ECU that truly has THAT MANY adjustable parameters. EG, the VAG ECUs are somewhere around 2,000 different tables for it to work out what to do at any one point in time. So for a vehicle being daily driven etc, I see this as a great advantage, but it does mean spending a bit more time, and with a tuner who really knows that ECU.   On the flip side, an aftermarket ECU, in something like a weekender, or a proper race car, torque based tuning IMO doesn't make that much sense. In those scenarios you're not out there hunting down stuff like "the best way to minimise fuel usage at minor power so that we can go from 8L/100km to 7.3L/100km. You're more worried about it being ready to make as much freaking power as possible when you step back on the loud pedal as you come out of turn 2, not waiting the extra 100ms for all the cams to adjust etc. So in this scenario, realistically you tune the motor to make power, based on the load. People will then play with things like throttle response, and drive by wire mapping to get it more "driveable".   Funnily enough, I was watching something Finnegans Garage, and he has a huge blown Hemi in a 9 second 1955 Chev that is road registered. To make it more driveable on the road recently, they started testing blocking up the intake with kids footballs, to effectively reduce air flow when they're on the road, and make the throttle less touchy and more driveable. Plus some other weird shit the yankee aftermarket ECUs do. Made me think of Kinks R34...
    • I do this, I also don't get the joke  
×
×
  • Create New...