Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Unfortunately there are very few people around with the time/money to buy both and test them back to back on the same car and dyno. Until there is I guess we'll never know. I've seen both up close off a car before and they're very schmick. I'm curious of the effects the 6boost oval entry into the turbo flange has on a dyno chart. Apparently it increases exhaust speed giving better response but you'd expect it to lessen the flow in the top end?

Now your making me want to sell my 8374. Any chance of seeing a dyno sheet from it? I know the numbers are probably top secret but even if you got rid of the numbers so we could get an idea of the curve.

yep there will be graphs I'm sure. we have agreed to provide the graphs to Borg Warner and Full Race and I'm sure they will want to share them. I don't know if the scale will be intact but I don't see why not. A certain power figure at just 1 point in time one 1 dyno doesn't really give the game away....

Sounds awesome so far- not sure if you are joking about needing a bigger turbo though haha. Have you already maxed it out, and thats the motivation for saying that - or is it just because it spools better than you anticipated so figure a bit more lag for a bit more power would be acceptable?

This turbo is advertised as being able to ~95lb/min of air - if thats accurate, this has the potential to be a 1000hp vehicle... call me conservative, but that might be just about enough for a track car ;)

yes serious about considering a bigger turbo. but we are not nearly finished with this one yet. like TheKeeper said we have not really stretched the legs on this one yet and the thought was pretty much like you said. it's response was so much better than expected that we'd be willing to sacrifice some of that for even more top end. but we'll have to see how much top end it has yet... if it makes a power number that is in kw at the wheels and starts with a 6 then we'll probably be satisfied.

the biggest thing the 9180 response has done for me is make me even more excited about the twin 6258s. they sit between a single 8374 and a 9180 in terms of flow (88lb/min combined). my thinking now is they'll probably be at least as responsive as -5s (maybe even -7s/GTSS?) and should outperform -10s up top. to early to stake my life on such predictions yet but it no longer seems impossible.

Yeah I don't have anything really bad to say about 6boost manifolds. they are a great product. I have recommended them to friends of mine as far back as 5 years ago (or more). I can't say I've tested the same turbo back to back on the same car with a full race vs a 6boost. maybe one day. but I have looked carefully at both. They are both great products but I personally feel the full race is a little more advanced. they are so nicely finished too.

No doubt some of the excellent spool and power you are getting with your turbo combo will have to be attributed to the manifolds, etc. The final product is effectively the sum of the parts used, it may not give the same result with an RPS Exhaust, XS Power exhaust manifold, reground cams and an old Microtech.

well anyone who reckoned the 9180 might be too big was way off...it's way more responsive than the -10s it replaced. getting the car set-up on the dyno at part throttle the thing is coming onto boost in the 3,000-4,000rpm range! my memory is hazy so don't quote me but off the top of my head at 4,000rpm it made 60kw more than the -10s

promising start - we think once you get more time with this turbokit the last thing youll worry about is pulling it off for another :thumbsup:

Great news Richard. We knew you'd like the performance. We've seen in person that it's not hype, but ultimately want the guys in the trenches to show the rest of the community just how impressive these turbos are...thanks for the props, we do our best to make a product you'll never have to replace.

^^^^^ +1

the biggest thing the 9180 response has done for me is make me even more excited about the twin 6258s. they sit between a single 8374 and a 9180 in terms of flow (88lb/min combined). my thinking now is they'll probably be at least as responsive as -5s (maybe even -7s/GTSS?) and should outperform -10s up top.

agreed - after we finished the twin turbo EFR6258 skyline in the US i started to reconsider my personal cars' turbo setup. My car is LHD so its much more difficult to fit the twins, however I consider the boost response and linearity of the twin 6258 powerband as phenomenal, so I am particularly eager to hear your impressions compared to all the twins youve run over the years. we have a steady supply of the smaller EFR's from borg warner so if i went twins i could potentially put my car back together quickly...

seriously though, don't comment too much on Full race gear till you've seen it in the flesh. it's hard to capture properly in pics just how nice it is.

thanks for the vote of confidence, that means a lot coming from a seasoned pro such as yourself. Everyone on our team at Full-Race works *hard* to put out a top-shelf product .. anybody that claims to top us in quality or design better have their act together because we do and its not easy!

I would suggest something around 280 10.5mm if it's a track car. the thing is lots of the jap cams are a bit too big on duration and too small on lift to enable them to be bolt in cams.

totally agree with you - 280 x 10.5 or 280 x 11.5 is a great cam. I personally prefer to have solid boost response by ~3500-3700rpm so for my driving style and 2.6L displacement the 8374 is preferred. For anyone with an Rb30 and an aggressive trans like you guys have the 9180 is clearly the monster.

going by the results I've heard of the 67mm S400SX turbos doing - the compressor wheel is probably capable of pretty serious things, all comes down to how much exhaust gas the 80mm turbine can do. I'm picking that if the cam specs thrown around are at all relevant to this setup, its capable of quite happily cracking 600kw on a hubdyno running E85.

we recently tested a 1.9L honda on the BW S400SX 67mm, which as you mention uses a similar design compressor wheel to the EFR 9180 but with the 83mm inconel turbine wheel for max exhaust flow and power, designed primarily as a drag racing 67mm not so much focused on spoolup/response. on a 1.9L honda engine, 31psi boost and E85 race fuel we saw 950hp on a dynapack hubdyno. does not spool nearly as well as the efr of course

not a chance.

:cheers:

Edited by Full-Race Geoff

yeah it's definitely true that results are often the sum of their parts. this car with the 9180 (no real secret I'm talking about the Advan/Hi-Octane RGM R34) is a maximum effort car so has the best gear where possible. nicely built RB30/26, ARC intercooler, hypertune plenum, full race manifold, twin turbo-smart gates, EFR 9180, beautifully made piping, hollinger, dry sump, autronic ecu and CDI etc etc. so if ever a 9180 is going to be pushed it will be on a car like this.

we have very high hopes. :)

yeah it's definitely true that results are often the sum of their parts. this car with the 9180 (no real secret I'm talking about the Advan/Hi-Octane RGM R34) is a maximum effort car so has the best gear where possible. nicely built RB30/26, ARC intercooler, hypertune plenum, full race manifold, twin turbo-smart gates, EFR 9180, beautifully made piping, hollinger, dry sump, autronic ecu and CDI etc etc. so if ever a 9180 is going to be pushed it will be on a car like this.

we have very high hopes. :)

Which model?

That is just awesome, can't wait to hear results... This is going to be the EFRs best chance to prove themselves, I gave up waiting for them to emerge but still hope to see success :)

yeah it's definitely true that results are often the sum of their parts. this car with the 9180 (no real secret I'm talking about the Advan/Hi-Octane RGM R34) is a maximum effort car so has the best gear where possible.

Why did they ditch the twins?

Sounds like it was a good idea by that initial report - when is tuning likely to be completed?

A decent single twin scroll turbo is the main thing that has been missing from that car's setup which has managed to have it not holding a special place in my "Man that this is so cool I wish I had one just like it" list :)

That is just awesome, can't wait to hear results... This is going to be the EFRs best chance to prove themselves, I gave up waiting for them to emerge but still hope to see success :)

Sounds like the plot to a cheesy American fighting movie! Hahaha!

not a chance.

Look I'm not going to get into a pissing contest as I own neither and hardly care what people opt to spend their money on, yet here is what I base my comment on:

post-43588-0-67057200-1311296642_thumb.jpg

post-43588-0-99119400-1311296633_thumb.jpg

One looks hand crafted, the other looks machine made and tidied up with a die grinder. Fact is, 6b are hand made and FR are machine made, cant change that and it is printed in plain text on the FR site. Such is supply and demand.

I will agree with all you kiddies that the FR is definitely the better looking product on the outside and I would certainly be happy to own one.

And yes 10 years and trip to club med based on two dangerous drive events, so be careful out there guys. As necessary as the law is, those upholding it dont always base their career choice on morals.

Look I'm not going to get into a pissing contest as I own neither and hardly care what people opt to spend their money on, yet here is what I base my comment on:

post-43588-0-67057200-1311296642_thumb.jpg

post-43588-0-99119400-1311296633_thumb.jpg

One looks hand crafted, the other looks machine made and tidied up with a die grinder. Fact is, 6b are hand made and FR are machine made, cant change that and it is printed in plain text on the FR site. Such is supply and demand.

I will agree with all you kiddies that the FR is definitely the better looking product on the outside and I would certainly be happy to own one.

And yes 10 years and trip to club med based on two dangerous drive events, so be careful out there guys. As necessary as the law is, those upholding it dont always base their career choice on morals.

I think you may want to re-read that post, because if you wrote it correctly it means you really have NO IDEA what you're talking about. If, somehow you got the names confused.... you're forgiven, we all make mistakes.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yea that’s why I said ima test them with multimeter and see the reads.
    • Only at idle. Isn’t a problem when rev it seems.
    • @Haggerty This seems silly to ask, but are you confident in your ability to tune the Haltech?  
    • Next on the to-do list was an oil and filter change. Nothing exciting to add here except the oil filter is in a really stupid place (facing the engine mount/subframe/steering rack). GReddy do a relocation kit which puts it towards the gearbox, I would have preferred towards the front but there's obviously a lot more stuff there. Something I'll have to look at for the next service perhaps. First time using Valvoline oil, although I can't see it being any different to most other brands Nice... The oil filter location... At least the subframe wont rust any time soon I picked up a genuine fuel filter, this is part of the fuel pump assembly inside the fuel tank. Access can be found underneath the rear seat, you'll see this triangular cover Remove the 3x plastic 10mm nuts and lift the cover up, pushing the rubber grommet through The yellow fuel line clips push out in opposite directions, remove these completely. The two moulded fuel lines can now pull upwards to disconnect, along with the wire electrical plug. There's 8x 8mm bolts that secure the black retaining ring. The fuel pump assembly is now ready to lift out. Be mindful of the fuel hose on the side, the hose clamp on mine was catching the hose preventing it from lifting up The fuel pump/filter has an upper and lower section held on by 4 pressure clips. These did take a little bit of force, it sounded like the plastic tabs were going to break but they didn't (don't worry!) The lower section helps mount the fuel pump, there's a circular rubber gasket/grommet/seal thing on the bottom where the sock is. Undo the hose clip on the short fuel hose on the side to disconnect it from the 3 way distribution pipe to be able to lift the upper half away. Don't forget to unplug the fuel pump too! There's a few rubber O rings that will need transferring to the new filter housing, I show these in the video at the bottom of this write up. Reassembly is the reverse Here's a photo of the new filter installed, you'll be able to see where the tabs are more clearing against the yellow OEM plastic Once the assembly is re-installed, I turned the engine over a few times to help build up fuel pressure. I did panic when the car stopped turning over but I could hear the fuel pump making a noise. It eventually started and has been fine since. Found my 'lucky' coin underneath the rear seat too The Youtube video can be seen here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLJ65pmQt44&t=6s
    • It was picked up on the MOT/Inspection that the offside front wheel bearing had excessive play along with the ball joint. It made sense to do both sides so I sourced a pair of spare IS200 hubs to do the swap. Unfortunately I don't have any photos of the strip down but here's a quick run down. On the back of the hub is a large circular dust cover, using a flat head screw driver and a mallet I prised it off. Underneath will reveal a 32mm hub nut (impact gun recommended). With the hub nut removed the ABS ring can be removed (I ended up using a magnetic pick up tool to help). Next up is to remove the stub axle, this was a little trickier due to limited tools. I tried a 3 leg puller but the gap between the hub and stub axle wasn't enough for the legs to get in and under. Next option was a lump hammer and someone pulling the stub axle at the same time. After a few heavy hits it released. The lower bearing race had seized itself onto the stub axle, which was fine because I was replacing them anyway. With the upper bearing race removed and the grease cleaned off they looked like this The left one looked pristine inside but gave us the most trouble. The right one had some surface rust but came apart in a single hit, figure that out?! I got a local garage to press the new wheel bearings in, reassemble was the opposite and didn't take long at all. Removing the hub itself was simple. Starting with removing the brake caliper, 2x 14mm bolts for the caliper slider and 2x 19mm? for the carrier > hub bolts. I used a cable tie to secure the caliper to the upper arm so it was out of the way, there's a 10mm bolt securing the ABS sensor on. With the brake disc removed from the hub next are the three castle nuts for the upper and lower ball joints and track rod end. Two of these had their own R clip and one split pin. A few hits with the hammer and they're released (I left the castle nuts on by a couple of turns), the track rod ends gave me the most grief and I may have nipped the boots (oops). Fitting is the reversal and is very quick and easy to do. The lower ball joints are held onto the hub by 2x 17mm bolts. The castle nut did increase in socket size to 22mm from memory (this may vary from supplier) The two front tyres weren't in great condition, so I had those replaced with some budget tyres for the time being. I'll be replacing the wheels and tyres in the future, this was to get me on the road without the worry of the police hassling me.
×
×
  • Create New...