Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Looks like the ASSET-Cam will be most constructive Craig.

I wonder about two things...

a) how strongly and vigorously an offender will try to get off a charge and...

b) how accurate the system is and how reliable the calibration will be.

Good find. :D

Looks like the ASSET-Cam will be most constructive Craig.

I wonder about two things...

a) how strongly and vigorously an offender will try to get off a charge and...

b) how accurate the system is and how reliable the calibration will be.

Good find. :D

I agree - especially when you consider that drivers will need to be able to judge how close they can approach another car without having to worry about getting a ticket.. but I'm guessing that you have to be driving very close/dangerously to be getting a ticket.

Does this mean that the police can be fined when they sit 30cm from your bumper before they pull you over for a "random" inspection to see if your car is dangerously unroadworthy?

Should have it detect police that park illegally to get some lunch or whatever..

or those police bikes during peak traffic illegally driving on the highway between cars.. has anyone else (in sth east qld) noticed how many of them are doing this during peak hour on the M1

You've got to be joking?

We already have this technology on our 90 stretch to Helltown and yesterday I was in the queue with a front row seat.

We're all crawling along at 70 to 90 so obviously the vehicles start to bunch up. (the Bruce Highway goes from 110 down to 80/90 until 20k's North of Helltown)

Take into account that there are all sorts of cars mixed in with semis of all descriptions, hills, grey nomads so the acceleration/deceleration rates are varied.

Next thing one of these electronic marvels lights up and you guessed it, someone up front panics and touches his brakes.

Nose to tail accidents were narrowly averted but it was a fine dry day so we continued on.

2K's down the road the next electronic marvel lights up warning that we're all speeding and fines/demerit points will be ours. No-one is doing anything near 90 yet again on come the stop lights.

Not only is this technology hopelessly inaccurate, it's road user's money spent in the most appalling fashion and all under the guise of road safety.

I say, spend the money on driver education and not this whiz bang electronic crap which BTW incorporates point to point radar just waiting to be phased in.

I would still prefer to see actual police enforce all our laws instead of fancy cameras. Why? Police are able to take into account the fact that shit happens in life and there will always be variables and circumstances that can't be taken into account by a computer that takes not much more than a picture and then decides upon 2 outcomes. Black or white, ticket or no ticket.

Ie: What happens when at the last second a perth motorist swerves into my lane, because trying to be a safe driver I have left a small gap between myself and the car infront? Sure, a picture will show that my bumper is right on the other persons tail but whos fault is that?

You've got to be joking?

We already have this technology on our 90 stretch to Helltown and yesterday I was in the queue with a front row seat.

We're all crawling along at 70 to 90 so obviously the vehicles start to bunch up. (the Bruce Highway goes from 110 down to 80/90 until 20k's North of Helltown)

Take into account that there are all sorts of cars mixed in with semis of all descriptions, hills, grey nomads so the acceleration/deceleration rates are varied.

Next thing one of these electronic marvels lights up and you guessed it, someone up front panics and touches his brakes.

Nose to tail accidents were narrowly averted but it was a fine dry day so we continued on.

2K's down the road the next electronic marvel lights up warning that we're all speeding and fines/demerit points will be ours. No-one is doing anything near 90 yet again on come the stop lights.

Not only is this technology hopelessly inaccurate, it's road user's money spent in the most appalling fashion and all under the guise of road safety.

I say, spend the money on driver education and not this whiz bang electronic crap which BTW incorporates point to point radar just waiting to be phased in.

pretty sure those boards at the cooroy turn off and near the amamoor turn off are just pressure sensor triggered and not camera operated, so it is slightly different.

Does this mean that the police can be fined when they sit 30cm from your bumper before they pull you over for a "random" inspection to see if your car is dangerously unroadworthy?

wow, they do that in victoria too. standard practice here if they see something or someone they don't like is:

* quickly and needless accelerate and break speed limit if neccessary to close distance between themselves and their 'suspect'

* commence tailgating 'suspect' at a distance of no more than 1/8th of a bees dick off the 'suspects' rear bumper to try and scare them into doing something dangerous

* continue tailgating till they are satisfied. this means either the 'suspect' has panicked and done something wrong, or sufficient time has passed and they are now bored.

* hit lights and sirens and commence 'random breath test' if no offences have been committed

When are they going to implement those speed cameras that detects when a road snail is hogging the right lane on the freeway while driving 20 under the limit?

Yes, I would love to see that. what is it with people in australia who love to form the rolling blockade? and as you come up behind them they look all offended like you are hooning along. in any other country people just get out of your way for a moment, let you pass and then get on with their lives. in australia prepare to spend 10mins stuck behind someone who wants to drive slower than you do and feels the need to enforce their self imposed speed limit onto you for some reason.

I would still prefer to see actual police enforce all our laws instead of fancy cameras. Why? Police are able to take into account the fact that shit happens in life and there will always be variables and circumstances that can't be taken into account by a computer that takes not much more than a picture and then decides upon 2 outcomes. Black or white, ticket or no ticket.

Ie: What happens when at the last second a perth motorist swerves into my lane, because trying to be a safe driver I have left a small gap between myself and the car infront? Sure, a picture will show that my bumper is right on the other persons tail but whos fault is that?

Agree with both those points. and your example is perfectly valid and happens all the time. as soon as you start leaving appropriate gaps between yourself and the car in front you quickly find yourself going backwards as car after car takes this as an invitation to invade your safe braking zone and get into that space.

I am dead against any of these monitoring systems or car mounted gear. it's all bad and all totally unnecessary. It's impact on the road toll is also highly debatable. just like fixed speed camers which also do nothing to help lower the road toll. good roads, safe cars and education lower the road toll. not fining people for doing 53 in a 50 zone.

pretty sure those boards at the cooroy turn off and near the amamoor turn off are just pressure sensor triggered and not camera operated, so it is slightly different.

Yes Marc they're so far wrong I wondered if perhaps they were operated by some kiddie back at HQ.

Ridiculously expensive joke really when the whole lot will soon be bypassed.

As for the right lane snails, that's just driver education, or the lack of. Not checking mirrors, all the usual suspects.

Followed the Army down to Matilda yesterday. They were flat out at around 80 and yet sticking to the right hand overtaking lanes. Checked their vehicles were LHD so there's a legitimate reason and you make allowances.

wow, they do that in victoria too. standard practice here if they see something or someone they don't like is:

* quickly and needless accelerate and break speed limit if neccessary to close distance between themselves and their 'suspect'

* commence tailgating 'suspect' at a distance of no more than 1/8th of a bees dick off the 'suspects' rear bumper to try and scare them into doing something dangerous

* continue tailgating till they are satisfied. this means either the 'suspect' has panicked and done something wrong, or sufficient time has passed and they are now bored.

* hit lights and sirens and commence 'random breath test' if no offences have been committed

Almost everytime I've been pulled over, I've had a cop sit on my ass to do it. Even the reasonable cops who haven't fined me. I understand some "drivers" still haven't heard about this milennia old invention we have called reflective surfaces, i.e. mirrors...but for those who do use them, surely a safe couple of metres away would suffice at first. I just don't see the point to enforcing law and breaking it at the same time. If you're going to nab me on something petty like a few km over or the suspicion that my car is unroadworthy then don't do worse shit to try and catch me for it. I'm sure on more than one occasion someone has seen the flashing lights, crapped themselves and instinctively stomped on the brakes. They'll wanna be careful if they ever tailgate me in a car worth less than my shirt.

And I don't accept this "police have been trained with special courses blah blah". Okay, can we make these courses available to the public so I too can drive like a f***wit?

/rant

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...